OTHER BLOOD GROUP SYSTEMS PART 3 (LU) Flashcards

1
Q

• (?) were first recognized in 1945 when (?) was discovered in a patient with lupus erythematosus diffusus after receiving a transfusion with blood carrying the low-incidence antigen.

A

Lutheran antigens

anti-Lua

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

was misinterpreted as Lutheran, derived from the donor’s name Luteran

A

• Anti-Lua

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Subsequently, [?], the antithetical partner to Lua, was described in 1956.

A

anti-Lub

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

was described in 1961, demonstrating dominant inheritance, contrary to most null phenotypes at the time.

A

Lu(a-b-)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

inherited as a recessive silent allele was identified.

A

Lu(a-b-)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

were used to test antibodies to unknown high-incidence antigens.

A

Rare Lu(a-b-) RBCs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Some sera showed a phenotypic relationship to Lutheran, reacting with all RBCs except

A

Lu(a-b-)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

These specificities were given numeric designations (?) to represent their association with the Lutheran system.

A

Lu4, Lu5, Lub, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Three pairs of antithetical antigens (?) have been shown to be inherited at the Lutheran locus.

A

Lu6 and Lu9, Lu8 and Lu14, Lu18 and Lu19

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Several antigens have been shown to be located on the Lutheran glycoprotein, while three antigens (?), often referred to as para-Lutheran, have limited evidence of belonging to the Lutheran system.

A

Lu11, Lu16, Lu17

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

• The ISBT designation of the Lutheran blood group system is

A

LU or 005.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

• Allelic Codominant Genes: are, produced by allelic codominant genes.

A

Lua and Lub antigens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

• Common Phenotypes: Most individuals express[?], while [?] phenotype is less common.

A

Lu(b)

Lu(a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

• Variable Expression: expression varies between individuals and even within an individual’s RBCs.

A

Lutheran antigen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

strength has been confirmed to have low density
and variable expression.

A

Lub antigen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

• Development: Antigens have been detected on fetal RBCs as early as [?], but they are poorly developed at birth and reach adult levels by age 15 years.

A

10 to 12 weeks of gestation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

• Distribution: have not been found on platelets, lymphocytes, monocytes, or granulocytes.

A

Lutheran antigens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

is widely distributed in tissues such as the brain, lung, pancreas, placenta, skeletal muscle, and hepatocytes, especially fetal hepatic epithelial cells.

A

Lutheran glycoprotein

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Type: Most examples are IgM naturally_ occurring saline agglutinins. Some may also be IgA or IgG.

A

•Anti-Lua

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Reactivity: They typically react better at room temperature than at 37°C, although some may react at 37°C by indirect antiglobulin test

A

Anti-Lua

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

are capable of binding complement, but in-vitro hemolysis has not been reported.

A

Anti-Lua

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

• Detection: often goes undetected in routine testing because most reagent cells are Lu(a).

A

Anti-Lua

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

It is more likely encountered as an incompatible crossmatch or during an antibody workup for another, specificity.

A

Anti-Lua

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Experienced technologists recognize Lutheran antibodies by their characteristic loose, mixed-field reactivity in a test tube.

A

Anti-Lua

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Effect of Enzymes: is not profoundly altered with common blood bank enzymes such as ficin and papain, but it can be destroyed with trypsin, chymotrypsin, pronase, AET, and DTT.
Anti-Lua
26
Most are clinically insignificant in transfusion.
Anti-Lua
27
There is one report of normal or near-normal survival of Lu(a) RBCs in a patient with
Anti-Lua
28
Immediate transfusion reactions due to are undocumented, and delayed reactions are rare and mild.
Anti-Lua
29
Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn (HDN): Because Lutheran antigens are poorly expressed on cord RBCs, cases of HDN associated with [?] are mild.
Anti-Lua
30
Infants may exhibit weakly positive or negative direct antiglobulin tests and mild to moderate elevations in bilirubin.
Anti-Lua
31
Many require no treatment, while others respond to simple phototherapy.
Anti-Lua
32
In one report of mild HDN, the mother's antibody titer rose to 4096.
Anti-Lua
33
Although the first example of [?] was a room-temperature agglutinin, most [?] is gG and reactive at 37°C at the antiglobulin phase.
Anti-Lub
34
IgM and IgA antibodies have also been noted.
Anti-Lub
35
It is primarily made in response to pregnancy or transfusion.
Anti-Lub
36
reacts with all cells tested except the auto-control, and reactions are often weaker with Lu(a-b-) RBCs and cord RBCs.
Alloanti-Lub
37
Ficin or papain does not significantly alter reactivity.
Anti-Lub
38
AET or DTT should destroy Lub antgen through disruption of the disulfide bond of the glycoprotein, but this may require optimal conditions.
Anti-Lub
39
Autologous RBCs will test [?] if typing sera are available.
Lu(a)
40
has been implicated with shortened survival of transfused cells and post-transfusion jaundice, but severe or acute hemolysis has not been reported
Anti-Lub
41
Chromium survival studies demonstrate a rapid initial clearance of some Lu(b-) RBCs but much slower removal of those remaining
Anti-Lub
42
may be regarded as clinically significant, but blood should not be withheld in emergency situations just because compatible units cannot be found
Anti-Lub
43
is associated with only mild cases of HDN.
anti-Lua, anti-Lub
44
This type of Lu(a-b-) phenotype is the result of a rare dominant regulator gene, which suppresses the expression of Lutheran antigens.
• Dominant In(Lu) Type
45
Blood donor screenings have shown the frequency of this type of Lutheran null to be relatively rare.
• Dominant In(Lu) Type
46
Individuals with this phenotype do not make anti-Lu3.
• Dominant In(Lu) Type
47
In some families, the Lu(a-b-) phenotype demonstrates recessive inheritance, resulting from having two rare silent alleles at the Lutheran locus.
• Recessive Lulu Type
48
Individuals with this phenotype truly lack all Lutheran antigens and can make an inseparable anti-Luab called anti-Lu3.
• Recessive Lulu Type
49
This rare Lu(a-b-) phenotype, observed in a large Australian family, is thought to be the result of an X-borne inhibitor to Lutheran.
• Recessive X-Linked Inhibitor Type
50
All Lu(a-b-) family members were male and carried trace amounts of Lub detected by adsorption-elution.
• Recessive X-Linked Inhibitor Type
51
Lu(a-b-w) individuals with weakened Lutheran antigens, also known as Lu(w), may result from In(Lu) with a lesser degree of penetrance or an allele to In(Lu) that causes less suppression.
• Lu(w) Phenotype
52
is a rare antibody that reacts with all RBCs except those testing Lu(a-b-).
Anti-Lu3
53
It is usually antiglobulin-reactive.
Anti-Lu3
54
This antibody is made only by Lulu individuals, i.e., the recessive type of Lu(a-b-).
Anti-Lu3
55
It is associated with only mild cases of HDN.
Anti-Lu3
56
RBCs from dominant and X-linked type Lu(a-b-) individuals can be safely transfused to patients with anti-Lu3.
Anti-Lu3
57
Other Lutheran Antigens:
• Lu4, Lu5, Lu7, Lu12, Lu13, and Lu20 • Lu11. Lu16, and Lu17
58
are antigens of very high incidence that are absent from Lu(a-b-) RBCs.
• Lu4, Lu5, Lu7, Lu12, Lu13, and Lu20
59
They are located on the Lutheran glycoprotein and have not been shown to be inherited at the Lu locus.
• Lu4, Lu5, Lu7, Lu12, Lu13, and Lu20
60
are high-incidence antigens phenotypically related to Lutheran but have not been shown to be located on the Lutheran glydoprotein nor have they been shown to be inherited.
• Lu11, Lu16, and Lu17
61
The Lutheran (Lu) system comprises two major antigens, [?], giving rise to four possible phenotypes: Lu(a+b-), Lu(a+b+), Lu(a-b+), and Lu(a-b-).
Lua and Lub
62
Among these, [?] is the most common phenotype.
Lu(a-b+)
63
• The genes encoding for the Lu antigens are linked to the
Se (secretor) genes
64
• Both antibodies are rare.
anti-Lua, and anti-Lub
65
react best at 37°C and often give a mixed field agglutination reaction
Lua
66
react best at 37°C in the antiglobulin phase of testing.
Lub
67
can cause mild hemolytic transfusion reactions (HTR), but they only rarely cause mild hemoiytic disease of the newborn (HDN)
• Lu antibodies
68
[?] are often naturally occurring, while [?] typically develop after RBC stimulation by transfusion or pregnancy.
Lua antibodies Lub antibodies
69
may manifest as a naturally occurring saline agglutinin that reacts optimally at room temperature.
• Anti-Lub
70
is typically an IgG antibody reactive at the antiglobulin phase
• Anti-Lub
71
usually produced in response to foreign RBC exposure during pregnancy or transfusion.
• Anti-Lub
72
is rare and may result from three different genetic backgrounds, including dominant In(Lu) type, recessive Lulu type, and recessive X-linked inhibitor type
Lu(a-b-)