Oct 2 Flashcards

1
Q

intersectionality from video

A

when multiple minoritized identities are present within one person

ie. gender, sexuality, race, body size

ie. Call Me By Your Name isn’t intersectional (white gay men) but Moonlight is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

intersectionality defined

A

impact of living with multiple marginalized statuses

different forms of social oppression are NOT ADDITIVE

they intersect and are unique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

categories that pertain to intersectionality

A

ability

mental health

gender expression

appearance

fertility

race

language

political affiliation

occupation

class

marital status

education

ehtnicity

nationality

sexual orientation

culture

personality

physical health

age

hobbies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

general theory linking intersectional experiences to health

A

INTERSECTIONAL IDENTITIES (ie. indigenous, female & disabled)

leads to

HEALTH OUTCOMES

mediated by

DISCRIMINATION EXPERIENCES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the primary explanatory mechanism between health outcomes incurred by people with intersectional identities?

A

discrimination experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3 different ways of thinking about intersectional experiences

A
  1. interaction approach
  2. qualitative work
  3. within-group quantitative work
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

interaction approach

A

ie. moderation

quantitative approach

multiplying things together and seeing how the results for diff groups are diff

interested in all sorts of factors

race
racegenderdiscrimination
race*gender
gender
discrimination

and how all of these contribute to outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

limitations of the interaction approach

A
  1. when we start multiplying diff variable tgt it gets harder to get statistical power to identify EFFECTS
  2. sample size for interactions - need lots of people at EACH INTERSECTION in order to correctly predict
  3. don’t experiences look different and mean different things depending on one’s intersectional group identities?
    - general items may not capture this
    - diff groups are subject to diff stereotypes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

qualitative work approach

A

getting people’s experiences in their own words - more rich, nuanced and detailed info than from self-report

ie. individual interviews, focus group interviews, analysis of forums/blogs/social media posts

between or within-group

often within-group

hearing about experiences from the source

more nuance than checking boxes

MEANING MAKING BEHIND EXPERIENCES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

qualitative work approach allows for ______ _______ behind experiences

A

meaning making

ie. how getting followed around in stores MAKES YOU FEEL, what you THINK ABOUT IT, how you MAKE SENSE OF IT and DEAL WITH IT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

qualitative work limitations

A
  1. generalizability
    - isn’t goal of this work to generalize to large populations
    - more of a deep dive into specific experiences of specific group
  2. labour intensive
  3. structural issues
    - less respected than qualitative work
    - historically is less privileged than hard numbers and big numbers of people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

within-group quantitative work

A

back to numbers, but deep diving into experience of group with a SPECIFIC INTERSECTION OF MARGINALIZED IDENTITIES

makes super unique measures, perfect for who we’re looking

more generalizable because it’s quantitative

targeted measures assessing experiences unique to intersectional identity groups under investigation

has the ADVANTAGES of qual (deeper dive) and quant (generalizability to group under study)

not as deep as qual - tells you about factors influencing disparities, but doesn’t highlight disparity itself since there’s no group comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

within-group quantitative work doesn’t highlight disparity itself since…

A

there’s no group comparison

just looks at a single group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2 examples of gender x race intersectionality

A

Kerum et al - GENDERED RACIAL MICRO AGGRESSIONS SCALE FOR ASIAN AMERICAN WOMEN

Lewis & Neville - GENDERED RACIAL MICRO AGGRESSION SCALE FOR BLACK WOMEN

both of these are within-group quantitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

example of within group quantitative method: Gendered Racial Microaggressions Scale for Asian American Women

A

gender x race intersectionality

ASCRIBED SUBMISSIVENESS
- “others expect me to be submissive”
- “others have been surprised when I disagree with them”

ASIAN FETISHISM
- “others express sexual interest in me because of my Asian appearance”

MEDIA INVALIDATION
- “I see non-Asian women being casted to play female Asian characters”

ASSUMPTION OF UNIVERSAL APPEARANCE
- “others have talked about AAW as if they all have the same facial features”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

example of within group quantitative method: Gendered Racial Micro Aggression Scale for Black Women

A

gender x race intersectionality

ASSUMPTIONS OF BEAUTY & SEXUAL OBJECTIFICATION
- “negative comments about size of facial features”
- “someone assumed I speak in a certain way”

SILENCED & MARGINALIZED
- “I’ve felt unheard”
- “my comments have been ignored”

STRONG BLACK WOMAN STEREOTYPE
- “someone assumed I was sassy and straightforward”
- “I’ve been told I’m too assertive”

ANGRY BLACK WOMAN STEREOTYPE
- “someone has told me to calm down”

17
Q

comparing the two gender x race scales

A

both are focused on hyper-sexualization of women

but each one has very unique specificities and items tailored to the intersection they’re examining

18
Q

SGM x racially minoritized people report…

A
  1. higher levels of exposure to stigma
  2. smaller support networks
  3. less feelings of control
18
Q

unique risks of SGM x racial minoritization

A
  1. racial discrimination while dating
  2. racism within larger LGBTQ+ community
  3. heterosexism in racial communities

DOUBLY OPPRESSED

(the above is a very non-exhaustive list)

19
Q

LGBT POC microaggressions scale

A

intersectional scale

items divided into:
1. racism in LGBT community
2. heterosexism in communities of colour
3. LGBT relationship racism

items:
- feeling misunderstood by white LGBT people

  • having to educate white LGBT people about race issues
  • feeling unwelcome at groups/events in your racial/ethnic community
  • not having LGBT POC as positive role models
20
Q

injustice at every turn: a look at black respondents in the national transgender discrimination survey GENERAL

A

2011 survey by national LGBTQ task force in the US

anti-trans bias + structural racism = trans POC experienced PARTICULARLY DEVASTATING levels of DISCRIMINATION

BLACK respondents fared worse than all others

21
Q

injustice at every turn: a look at black respondents in the national transgender discrimination survey SPECIFIC

A

much higher levels of unemployment, homelessness, extreme poverty and HIV

  1. black trans people had EXTREMELY HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AT 26%
    - twice the overall trans sample
    - 4 times the rate of general population
  2. 41% of Black respondents said they’d experienced HOMELESSNESS
    - more than 5 times the general population
  3. black trans people lived in EXTREME POVERTY - 34% reported household income of less than $10 k per year
  4. black trans people were affected by HIV IN DEVASTATING NUMBERS
22
Q

multiracial SGM youth

A

intersectional identities along axis of RACE and SEXUAL ORIENTATION/GENDER IDENTITY

also intersection of MULTIPLE RACIAL GROUP MEMBERSHIP

23
Q

multiracial people violate…

A

monoracial paradigm of race

24
Q

very high proportion of SGM youth are…

A

multiraical

multiracial people are only 10% of the population

yet they’re 41% of the SGM youth population

25
Q

multiracial SGM youth and suicide

A

higher SUICIDAL IDEATION and ATTEMPTS than mono-racial youth

especially heightened risk for DUAL-MINORITY MULTI-RACIALS (when their mixed race from multiple minority races ie. not half white)

26
Q

jackson et al - multilevel stigma & depression among Black & Latinx LGBTQ+ adolescents SETUP

A

national US sample

2561 Black and Latinx adolescents

aged 13-17

examining how:
- interpersonal racial discrimination
- sexual orientation-based discrimination
- STATE-LEVEL STRUCTURAL STIGMA/PROTECTION MARKERS (both general and adolescent-specific) impact depressive symptoms

essentially, looked at state-level factors and looked at depression levels (mild, moderate, severe)

27
Q

jackson et al - multilevel stigma & depression among Black & Latinx LGBTQ+ adolescents - STATE LEVEL INDICATORS OF ANTI LGBTQ+ STRUCTURAL STIGMAS

A
  1. support for POLICIES & LAWS that impact LGB individuals
  2. LGBTQ+ public officials
  3. density of GSAs (gay straight alliances)
  4. antibullying & nondiscrimination legislation
  5. state CONVERSION THERAPY BANS
  6. protections for LGBTQ+ youth in FOSTER CARE
  7. “don’t say gay” legislation
  8. IMPLICIT ATTITUDES towards sexual minorities

^looked at these in every US state, and added them up. states with higher scores had more harmful climates for LGBTQ+ adolescents

28
Q

jackson et al - multilevel stigma & depression among Black & Latinx LGBTQ+ adolescents - FINDINGS

A

looked at associations between structural stigmas and moderate to severe depressive symptoms

3 predictors:
- anti-LGBTQ+ structural stigma environment
- endorsed racial/ethnic bullying
- endorsed sexual orientation bullying

^all of the above positive predicted higher depressive symptoms

29
Q

Homan et al: how do intersecting structural inequalities shape health? SETUP

A

created measures of:
- STRUCTURAL SEXISM

  • STRUCTURAL RACISM

used existing measure of:
- INCOME INEQUALITY

(used Gini coefficient)

measured each US state on these factors

30
Q

Homan et al: how do intersecting structural inequalities shape health? findings 1

A

compared states on their levels of:
- structural racism
- structural sexism
- income inequality

and then looked at how these are ASSOCIATED WITH EACH OTHER

ie. do states with more structural racism also have more structural sexism?

found a NEGATIVE CORRELATION
- so states with more structural sexism tend to have less structural racism, and vice versa

31
Q

Homan et al: how do intersecting structural inequalities shape health? findings 2

A

also looked at SELF RATED HELATH of black and white women in states with DIFFERENT COMBOS of STRUCTURAL INEQUALITY

  1. impacts on health MOST PRONOUNCED when comparing White to Black women
  2. lower overall level of health, and Black women in states with:
    - high racism
    - high racism & sexism
    - high racism & sexism & income inequality
    show worse health than their average
  3. comparatively, White women women in states with:
    - high racism
    - high racism & sexism
    - high racism & sexism & income inequality
    DON’T REALLY SHOW WORSE HEALTH than their average

both white and black women are impacted, but impacts are MORE PRONOUNCED/HARMFUL for black than white women overall

32
Q

general intersectional experiences SUMMARY

A
  1. important to attend more and more to issues of intersectionality
  2. different ways of assessing intersectionality - ALL 3 ARE NEEDED
  3. SGM POC face UNIQUE stressors
    - multiracial SGM youth = high risk group within that population
  4. structural approaches are growing and can give us unique insights