Mod 11 Example of Reversal Design (Kelley et al.) Flashcards

1
Q

Several types of problematic behavior occur in children with severe burns. These include

disfigurement
low fluid intake
tantrums
all of the above

A

tantrums

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Staff problems arise while caring for burned children. One reason for staff problems is

noise level of screaming in work setting
multiple types of treatment involved
behavior problems exhibited by these children
long work hours

A

noise level of screaming in work setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Burned children’s crying behavior results in

modified treatment
peer attention
more pain monitoring by the patient
delay of treatment

A

delay of treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

One early study (1980) combined 2 experimental designs. These included

multiple baseline and A-B-A
changing criteria and differential reinforcement
B-A-B and multiple baseline across behaviors
alternating treatment and reversal

A

multiple baseline and A-B-A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The experimental design used in this study was

B-A-B
alternating treatments
A-B-A-B
multi-element

A

A-B-A-B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The 2 elements devised by Kelley et al. (1984) for treating burned children included

2 differential reinforcement procedures
2 primary reinforcers
noncontingent positive attention from adults and contingent attention from nurses
2 conditioned reinforcers

A

2 conditioned reinforcers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which of these functioned as dependent variables for this study?

duration of different types of pain behavior
scores on self-assessment arousal scale
verbal and nonverbal indications of pain
duration of exposure to the independent variable

A

verbal and nonverbal indications of pain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The independent variables in this study were:

therapist reprimands
praise from parent(s)
hydrotherapy and occupational therapy
cartoon viewing and gold stars

A

cartoon viewing and gold stars

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why did the experimenters limit withdrawal of independent variable for no more than single sessions at a time?

children’s medical conditions
children were unable to tolerate it for long durations
ethical constraints
legal constraints

A

ethical constraints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What data recording method was used in this study? (Look at this carefully! Many, many students get this answer wrong.)

event recording
30-min time sampling
continuous 30-s intervals
partial-interval 30 s

A

partial-interval 30 s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How was cartoon viewing time measured?

5 consecutive seconds during a 30-s interval
every viewing occurrence during a 30-s interval
5 consecutive seconds with eyes open toward TV within a 30-s interval
children’s responses after each TV session

A

5 consecutive seconds with eyes open toward TV within a 30-s interval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the label for the y-axis on the children’s graphs?

sessions
percent pain intervals
baseline
0-100

A

percent pain intervals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the label for the x-axis of the children’s graph?

sessions
0-100
percent pain intervals
TV and feedback

A

sessions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In what condition did the highest percentage of pain intervals occur for Melissa?

none of these
A1
B1
A2

A

A1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Melissa’s highest percentage of pain intervals was
83%
90%
93%
80%

A

83%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Beth’s lowest percentage of pain intervals (discounting the 0% in A1) were

1% and 7%
1% and 12%
10% and 12%
3% and 5%

A

1% and 7%

17
Q

Using A1-B1-A2-B2 description of the conditions/sessions for Melissa’s treatment, during which condition/session did percent of pain intervals decrease most significantly?

A2
A1
B2
B1

A

B2

18
Q

What was the range of percent of pain intervals during second treatment for Beth?

32-52%
68-28%
12-56%
25-68%

A

12-56%

19
Q

The goal of this study was to offer the child a nonpunitive ___________ pain behavior.

avoidance of
reinforcer for
alternative to
escape from

A

alternative to

20
Q

According to the procedure described in the article, which of the following would earn a star for the child?

good behavior
25% less pain behavior than last 2 days of baseline
continuous cartoon viewing/ treatment session
decreased rates of negative interactions with parents

A

25% less pain behavior than last 2 days of baseline

21
Q

The treatment approach in this article involved component procedures. (Select all that apply.)

complex
basic
respondent
operant

A

respondent
operant