๐ŸŸฃ Memory: Factors affecting accuracy of eyewitness testimony Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three two that impact the accuracy of eyewitness testimony

A

Misleading information

Anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is misleading information

A

Incorrect information given to eyewitnesses usually after an event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the main two types of misleading information

A

Leading questions

Post event discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are leading questions

A

They are questions which are phrased in a way that influences witnesses testimony as it implies a certain type of answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the procedure on the research done on leading questions

A

They got 45 participants to watch a clip of car accidents then asked some question about it before asking the leading question

โ€œAbout how fast were the cars going when they hit each otherโ€

Participants were split into 5 groups and 4 of the groups had the verb โ€œhit to contacted, bumped, collided and smashed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who conducted research done on leading questions and in what year

A

Loftus and Palmer (1974)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the results of the research done on leading questions

A

Group with the verb contacted guessed an average speed of 31.8 mph

Group with the verb smashed guessed an average speed of 40.5mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the verbs (the IV) that influenced the results of the research done on leading questions by Loftus and Palmer (1974)

A

Hit

Collided

Smashed

Bumped

Contacted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the results of the research on leading question show about leading questions as a concept

A

It shows that leading questions biased the eyewitnesses recall - decreasing the accuracy of eyewitness testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the leading question that was asked during the procedure of the research on leading questions

A

About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two ways in which leading question can impact the accuracy of eyewitness testimony

A

Response-bias explanation

Substitution explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the response-bias explanation of leading questions

A

It suggests that the wording of a question has no effect on the memory - but only influences the way in which the witness decides to reply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the substitution explanation of leading questions

A

It suggests that the wording of a question alters the memory of the events that the witnesses experienced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When was Loftus and Palmers second experiment on leading question, supporting the substitution explanation

A

1974

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the results on Loftus and Palmers second experiment on leading question, supporting the substitution explanation

A

Participants who heard the word smashed were more likely to report seeing broken glass than those who heard the word hit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the procedure on the research done on post event discussion

A

Gabbert et al. (2003) got participants to watch a video of the same crime in pairs - but in different POVโ€™s

And each person in a pair saw events that the other couldnโ€™t see

After they watched the video they were given time to discuss the event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is post-event discussion

A

It is when witnesses discuss events with each other after it has occured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Who conducted research done on post-event discussion and in what year

A

Gabbert et al. (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the results of the research done on post event discussion (Include the control group)

A

71% of participants recalled stuff of the event that they did not see themselves

In the control group 0% of other information was recalled by the other persons POV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What did the results of the research on post-event discussion show

A

It shows that post-event discussion could lead to memory conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are the two ways in which post-event discussion can impact the accuracy of eyewitness testimony

A

Memory contamination

Memory conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is memory contamination

A

When witnesses combine information from what theyโ€™ve heard from other witnesses and what they recall from their own memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is memory conformity

A

When witnesses go along with another witnesses POV because they think the other person is in the right - but the initial memory is unchanged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Does knowing the affect that post-event discussion change anything and how

A

Yes - affects that post-event discussion will decrease when participants are aware of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are the evaluation points of misleading information as a type of factor affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimonies

A

Real-world application of misleading information

Counterpoint of real-world application

Evidence against substitution

Evidence challenging memory conformity

26
Q

What are the strengths of misleading information as a type of factor affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimonies

A

Real-world application of misleading information

27
Q

What are the limitations of misleading information as a type of factor affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimonies

A

Counterpoint of real-world application

Evidence against substitution

Evidence challenging memory conformity

28
Q

Describe the real-world application that strengthens misleading information as a factor affecting the accuracy of EWT

A

Psychologists can improve the way that legal systems work and can try to prevent inaccurate EWTโ€™s by using Loftusโ€™ (1975) beliefs on how leading questions can distort memory

Police officers are carful with their wording because of this

29
Q

Explain how the real-world application validates misleading information as a factor affecting the accuracy of EWT

A

It shows it is reliable at protecting innocent people

30
Q

Describe the real-world application counterpoint that limits misleading information as a factor affecting the accuracy of EWT

A

In Loftus and Palmerโ€™s initial study (1974) participants were watching clips and not witnessing real life events

And Foster et al (1994) pointed out that real-world recalling holds consequences

31
Q

Explain how the real-world application counterpoint invalidates misleading information as a factor affecting the accuracy of EWT

A

It proves that the studies done of misleading information are pointless since participants donโ€™t face any consequences for their statements

32
Q

Describe the evidence against substitution that limits misleading information as a factor affecting the accuracy of EWT

A

Sutherland and Hayne (2001) got participants to watch a clip and asked misleading questions afterwards

Participants recall for central details were more accurate than peripheral ones and shows that original memories for central details was not distorted

33
Q

Explain how the evidence against substitution invalidates misleading information as a factor affecting the accuracy of EWT

A

Substitution explanation did not account for central details not facing distortion

34
Q

Describe the evidence challenging memory conformity that limits misleading information as a factor affecting the accuracy of EWT

A

Skagerberg and Wright (2008) showed participants (in pairs) two versions of the same clips with slight variants and allowed the pairs to discuss what they saw afterwards

The participants did not just say what their partner saw, or only what they saw - but testified a blend of both

35
Q

Explain how the evidence challenging memory conformity invalidates misleading information as a factor affecting the accuracy of EWT

A

The blend suggests that memory is disturbed through memory contamination and not memory conformity which initial research on post-event discussion id not account for

36
Q

How would anxiety have a negative effect on recall

A

Anxiety could create physiological arousal in the body worsening recall as it prevents us from paying attention

37
Q

How would anxiety have a positive affect on recall

A

Anxiety could create physiological arousal in the body improving recall as it would initiate the flight or flight response which increases awareness

38
Q

How can the presence of a weapon impact recall

A

It leads to the focus on the weapon and not any other details of the event

39
Q

Who researched the negative effect that anxiety has on recall

A

Johnson and Scott (1976)

40
Q

When did Johnson and Scott investigate the negative effect that anxiety has on recall

A

1976

41
Q

Describe the procedure of the negative effect that anxiety has on recall (Johnson and Scott)

A

There were two conditions of participants which Johnson and Scott lead them to believe they were in a lab study

While seated in a waiting room participants in the low anxiety condition heard casual conversation followed by a man exiting the room with greasy hands and a pen in his hands

Whereas participants in the high anxiety condition heard a heated argument followed by a man exiting with bloody hands and a knife

Participants in both conditions were then told to pick out the man out of 50 photos

42
Q

What were the two conditions of the investigation on negative effect on recall

A

Low anxiety condition (casual conversation followed by mean with greasy hands and a pen)

High anxiety condition (heated argument followed by a mean with bloody hands and a knife)

43
Q

What are the findings on the investigation of the negative effects that anxiety has on recall

A

When asked to pick out the man out of 50 pictures

49% of people in the low-anx condition were able to identify the man

and

33% of people in the high-anx condition were able to identify the man

44
Q

What is tunnel theory

A

A theory which suggests that people have enhanced memory for central events

45
Q

What is an example of tunnel theory

A

Weapon focus

46
Q

Who researched the positive effect that anxiety has on recall

A

Yuille and Cutshall (1986)

47
Q

When did Yuille and Cutshall investigate the negative effect that anxiety has on recall

A

1986

48
Q

Describe the procedure of the positive effect that anxiety has on recall (Yuille and Cutshall)

A

Yuille and Cutshall (1986) conducted a study with 13โ„21 witnesses of a shooting in a gun shop in Vancouver, Canada where a gun owner shot a thief dead.

They interviewed these witnesses 4-5 months after the incident and compared the new interview to the original police interview

and

witnesses were asked how they felt at the time of the incident on a (7 point scale) and were asked if they had any emotional problems

49
Q

What are the findings on the investigation of the positive effects that anxiety has on recall

A

Although details such as age/height and weight estimations were less accurate

Results show that recall for those who reported higher stress levels showed 88% of accurate recall compared to 75% for those reported to be less stressed

50
Q

What are the contradictory findings on the effects anxiety has on recall

A

The contradictory finding is that the relationship between emotional arousal and performance is like an inverted U - and that too high and too low anxiety has a negative affect on recall

51
Q

Who discovered the contradictory finding on the effects anxiety has on recall

A

Yerkes and Dodson (1908)

52
Q

What year did Yerkes and Dodson encounter the contradictory findings on the effects anxiety has on recall

A

1908

53
Q

Describe the Labyrinth of Horror procedure

A

Researchers did a real word study were they offered people discounts to take part of their study in the Labyrinth of Horror at the London dungeon

At the end of the visit they self reported their anxiety levels and wore wireless heart monitors to verify the anxiety they experienced and were split into high anx and low anx category

Participants were then asked to describe a person (an actor in the labyrinth) that they encountered

54
Q

Who conducted the Labyrinth of Horror procedure

A

Valentine and Mesout (2009)

55
Q

What are the finding of the Labyrinth of Horror procedure

A

High anx participants recalled fewest correct details and made more mistakes

17% of high anx participants correctly identified the actor compared to 75% correct by those in the low anx group

56
Q

What are the evaluation points of anxiety as a factor affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony

A

Unusualness has a negative effect on anxiety and not anxiety

Research supporting the positive effect anxiety has on recall

Research supporting the negative effect anxiety has on recall

Research supporting the positive effect anxiety has on recall counterpoint

57
Q

What are the limitations of anxiety as a factor affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony (Eval points)

A

Unusualness has a negative effect on anxiety and not anxiety

Research supporting the positive effect anxiety has on recall counterpoint

58
Q

What are the strengths of anxiety as a factor affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony (Eval points)

A

Research supporting the positive effect anxiety has on recall

Research supporting the negative effect anxiety has on recall

59
Q

Explain how unusualness impacting recall limits anxiety as a factor that affects the accuracy of eyewitness testimony

A

Johnson and Scottโ€™s study may have tested unusualness and not anxiety

It shows that research that shows the affect that anxiety has on recall is not accurate

60
Q

What study showed that unusualness is a factor that affects recall and not anxiety

A
61
Q

Describe study showed that unusualness is a factor that affects recall and not anxiety

A