🟣 Memory: coding, capacity, and duration of memory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is short term memory

A

A memory store that has limited capacity along side a short duration in terms of memory holding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is long term memory

A

A memory store that has unlimited capacity along side a with a duration that can last a lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is coding

A

The way in which information is kept in the various memory stores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is information coded in short term memory

A

Acoustically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is information coded in long term memory

A

Semantically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who was able to discover and show the difference between the two main memory stores (STM + LTM)

A

Alan Baddeley (1966)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

State the weakness of Baddeley’s coding research of STM and LTM

A
  • He used artificial material which had no personal meaning to the participants
  • So, Baddeley’s finding may not tell us about different kinds of memory tasks ESPECIALLY in everyday life
  • E.g when processing more meaningful information, semantic coding can be used even in the STM
  • This shows that Baddeley’s finding of the coding of STM and LTM have limited application
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was a strength is Alan Baddeley’s (1966) coding research

A
  • He was clearly able to distinguish the way in which coding occurred in short term memory and in long term memory
  • AND although later research shows there’s from exceptions to Baddeley’s findings, THE idea that STM mainly consists of acoustic encoding and that LTM consists of semantic encoding has NOT CHANGED
  • This shows his findings are an important step in our understanding of the memory system AND his finding led to the MSM of memory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are acoustically similar words

A

Words that sound similar to each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are semantically similar words

A

Words that have a similar/ the same meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is duration

A

The length of time in which information can be held in the memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who researched the duration of STM

A

Margaret and Lloyd Peterson (1959)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who researched the duration of LTM

A

Harry Bahrick et al (1975)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

State the procedure of Bahrick et al’s research on duration of LTM (1975)

A
  • He studied 392 Americans ages 17-74 to test their duration of LTM
  • This was tested int two ways
  • Photo recognition - using 50 photos (some from the parti’s yearbooks)
  • Free recall (remembering their peers names from the yearbooks)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

State the findings of Bahrick et al’s research on duration of LTM

A
  • Participants tested w/in 15 years of graduation were 90% accurate in photo recognition AND after 48 years, recall declined to 70% for photo recognition
  • For free recall, participants tested w/in 15 years were 60% accurate AND after 48 years, recall dropped to 30%
  • This shows LTM lasts up to a lifetime for some material
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe Baddeley’s (1966) procedure on coding of the STM + LTM

A
  • He put participants into four groups and gave each a different list of words to remember
  • Group 1 - got acoustically similar words
  • Group 2 - got words that were not acoustically similar
  • Group 3 - got words that were semantically similar
  • Group 3 - got words that were semantically dissimilar
17
Q

State the findings of Alan Baddeley’s research on coding of STM + LTM

A
  • When asked to recall information immediately (recalling from STM) - participants in group one struggled recalling the acoustically similar words which shows that STM is coded acoustically
  • When asked to recall information 20 minutes later (Recalling from LTM) - participants in group 3 struggled recalling the semantically similar words
  • This shows that information is encoded acoustically in the STM and that information is encoded semantically in the LTM
18
Q

Describe the Petersons research on the duration of STM

A
  • 24 students were tested in 8 trials
  • On each trial they were given a consonant syllable and a 3-digit number
  • Students were told to count backwards from this 3 digit number to prevent mental rehearsal
  • Then on each trial they were told to recall the syllables after 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 seconds
19
Q

What was the results of Margaret and Lloyd Petersons research on STM duration

A
  • After 3 seconds on average 80% of information was remembered
  • But after 18 seconds the average dropped to 3%
  • This suggests that STM duration is 18 seconds unless verbal rehearsal is performed
20
Q

Who researched capacity of STM (and in what year)

A
  • Jacobs (1887) - Digit span test
  • Miller (1956) - Chucking and the capacity of STM (7±2)
21
Q

Describe the procedure of Jacobs’ research (1887) on the capacity of STM

A
  • Jacobs conducted the digit span test
  • Researcher reads out 4 digits and tells a participant to recall it - then does the same with 5 digits and so on until they can no longer remember them in the correct order
22
Q

State the findings of Jacobs’ research on capacity (1887)

A
  • Mean span for digits was 9.3
  • Mean span for letters was 7.3
23
Q

State Miller’s (1956) observations on the capacity of STM

A
  • He observed and noted that things come in 7’s (e.g 7 notes of a musical scale, 7 days of the week, 7 deadly sins) and from this concluded that the span (i.e capacity of STM is 7±2 items)
  • He also mentioned that recalling 5 words can be as easily as recalling 5 letters AND SO memory can be improved by chunking
24
Q

What is chunking

A

It is grouping sets of digits or letters INTO units or chunks

25
Q

Limitation of Margaret and Lloyd Peterson’s research on the duration of STM

A
  • Their stimuli was artificial (made up) and lacked any real meaning to the participants
  • AND ALTHOUGH the study was not completely useless as sometimes we memories meaningless materials (e.g phone numbers) - the recall of consonant syllables DOES NOT refer to everyday memory activities
  • This shows that the Petersons study lacked external validity
26
Q

Outline the strength of Bahrick’s et al’s research on the duration of LTM

A
  • The experiment had high external validity
  • The researchers investigates meaningful memories of people faces and names that they have encountered
  • Furthermore, Shepard (1967) conducted a similar study to Bahrick et al, testing he duration of LTM, but used meaningless pictures. Due to this recall rates lowered
  • This shows Bahrick et al’s findings reflected a more ‘legitimate’ estimate of the duration of LTM
27
Q

Outline the strength of Joseph Jacobs’ research on capacity (1887)

A
  • His study has been replicated.
  • Although Jacobs’ study is very old + most early studies lacked adequate control of confounding variables (e.g some participants’ digit span may have been underestimated bc of distractions)
  • His study was replicated by Bopp and Verhaegen in 2005 under better control which increases the validity of the digit test span
28
Q

State a weakness of Joseph Jacobs’ research on capacity (1887)

A

Initial studies lacked an adequate control

29
Q

Outline a limitation in Miller’s research on the capacity of the STM (1956)

A
  • He may have overestimated the capacity of the STM
  • E.g Nelson (2001) reviewed other research and concluded that the capacity was actually 4±1 items
  • This shows that the lower end of Miler’s estimate (5 items) is more appropriate than the higher end of Miller’s estimate (7-9 items)