šŸŸ£ Memory: Explanations for forgetting Flashcards

1
Q

What are the two explanations for forgetting

A

Retrieval failure

Interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is interference theory

A

A form of forgetting stating that interference occurs when at least two pieces of information disrupt each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the types of interference

A

Proactive interference

Retroactive interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is proactive interference

A

It is when new information is forgotten - the new information is disrupted by old information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Example of retroactive interference

A

Forgetting old dance moves after learning new dance moves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Example of proactive interference

A

A teacher finding it hard remembering the names of her current class because she has learnt many names in the past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is retroactive interference

A

When old information is forgotten - when old information is disrupted by new information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What effects does similarity have to interference

A

The more similar the memories are the more likely that they are to be disrupted or corrupted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain the effects of similarity research process

A

Participants were given a list of 10 words to learn - then another list was given to them to remember and there were 6 different lists given to 6 groups of participants consisting of words what were synonyms to the original list and ones that were antonyms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who researched the effects of similarity in interference theory

A

McGeoch and Mcdonald (1931)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the evaluation points for Interference theory

A

ā€¢ Real-world example of interference
ā€¢ Counter point of real-world example
ā€¢ Cues overcome interference
ā€¢ Drug studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the strengths of interference theory

A

ā€¢ Real-world example supporting interference theory

ā€¢ Drug studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the weaknesses of interference

A

ā€¢ Counterpoint to real world example of interferences

ā€¢ Cues overcome interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who researched the real-world study that supports interference theory and in what year

A

Baddeley and Hitch (1977)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the real word example that supports interference theory

A

Rugby players were asked to recall the names of the teams that they played during the season

Players who played the most games recalled poorer than those who played the least games (due to injuries etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is real-world study of interference a strength of interference theory

A

It increases the validity of the theory as it shows how interference occurs in the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain the counterpoint of the real-world study that supports interference

A

Due to the study being a real-world application, it lacked control and had many extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Who discovered that cues can overwhelm interference and in what year

A

Tulving and Pstoka (1971)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Tulving and Psotka find out about interference and cues

A

They found out interference is temporary and can be overwhelmed by cues

20
Q

How did Tulving and Psotka (1971) find out cues can overwhelm interference and what were the results

A

They found this by giving participants a list of words one at a time organised into categories recall average was about 70% and got worse after learning another category of words

However after given a cue (name of the category) recall rose back to 70%

21
Q

How is the fact that cues can overwhelm interference a limitation of interference theory

A

It proves that it does not cover all aspects of forgetting

22
Q

Who conducted the drug studies of interference theory

A

Coenen and Luijtelaar (1997)

23
Q

What were the drug studies of interference theory

A

Participants were given a list of word to remember, then were given diazepam (so they werenā€™t able to encode new info) then given another set of words to remember

When asked to recall first set of words they were able to do so very accurately because no information disrupted the other

24
Q

How is the drug studies test a strengthen interference theory

A

Proves the interference occurs when two pieces of information disrupts the other or each other

25
Q

What is retrieval failure

A

A form of forgetting when cues (encoded alongside info being learnt) are unavailable during the time of recall

26
Q

What is the encoding specificity principle (ESP)

A

A principle that states that a helpful cue has to be present during encoding and during recall

27
Q

What is context-dependent forgetting

A

Forgetting that happens due to external cues

28
Q

Examples of context-dependent cues

A

Weather

Location

29
Q

Examples of state-dependent cues

A

Being drunk

Feeling upset

30
Q

What is state-dependent forgetting

A

Forgetting that happens due to internal cues

31
Q

What research had been done context-dependent forgetting

A

Four conditions were created for deep sea divers to learn and recall a list of words and see whether the environment impacted or impeded recall ability

32
Q

What were the conditions that the deep sea divers had to learn and recall information during context-dependent forgetting research

A

ā€¢ Learn on land - recall on land
ā€¢ Learn on land - recall underwater
ā€¢ Learn underwater - recall on land
ā€¢ Learn underwater - recall underwater

33
Q

What were the results of Godden and Baddeley (1975) research of context-dependent forgetting

A

Accurate recall was 40% lower in non-matching conditions

34
Q

Explain the research that had been done on state-dependent forgetting

A

Carter and Cassady (1998) created for conditions on participants by giving them antihistamine drugs (mild sedative) to create a different internal cue from normal

35
Q

Who researched context-dependent forgetting and in what year

A

Godden and Baddeley (1975)

36
Q

Who researched state-dependent forgetting and in what year

A

Carter and Cassaday (1998)

37
Q

What were the conditions that participants had to learn and recall information during context-dependent forgetting research

A

Learn on drug - recall on drugs
Learn on drugs - recall when sober
Learn sober - recall when on drugs
Learn sober - recall when sober

38
Q

What was the results of the state-dependent forgetting research

A

Performance was significantly worse when there was a mismatch between internal states

39
Q

What are the evaluation points of retrieval failure

A

Research supporting retrieval failure

Research supporting retrieval failure counterpoint

Real world application of retrieval failure

Retrieval failure only accounts for recall and not recognition

40
Q

What are the limitations of retrieval failure

A

Retrieval failure only accounts for recall and not recognition

Research supporting retrieval failure counterpoint

41
Q

What are the strengths of retrieval failure

A

Research supporting retrieval failure counterpoint

Real world application of retrieval failure

42
Q

Explain the evaluation point of real-world application of retrieval failure

A

Baddeley suggests that cues donā€™t have a strong effect of forgetting but is still worth paying attention to

Because

When he have trouble remembering something we usually go to the environment in which we last encoded or recalled it

43
Q

How is the evaluation point of real-world application of retrieval failure a strength

A

It increases the validity of retrieval failure as if shows it is applicable to real world scenarios

44
Q

Explain the research support strengthening retrieval failure as a form of forgetting

A

As well as Godden and Baddeleyā€™s study (1975) on context-dependent forgetting and Carter and Cassadayā€™s study (1998)

Memory researchers Keane and Eysenck (2010) argue that retrieval failure is the main reason for forgetting in the LTM

45
Q

How is the research support strengthening retrieval failure as a form of forgetting also seen as a counterpoint

A

Baddeley (1997) stated that context-dependent cues donā€™t happen often in real life

And that the studies conducted have dramatic contrast in external cues making then not applicable to real life scenarios

46
Q

Explain how retrieval failure only accounting for recall and not recognition is a limitation of retrieval failure as a form of forgetting

A

It shows that retrieval failure is a limited explanation for forgetting because it only accounts for recall and not recognition

47
Q

Explain the recall vs recognition evaluation point limiting retrieval failure as a form of forgetting and what it showed

A

Godden and Baddeley (1980) replicated their underwater experiment but did a recognition test instead of a recall test

(They asked participants if they recognised a list of words and were not required to recall it)

And it showed that performance was the same in all four of the conditions