Maternal Deprivation Flashcards

1
Q

who came up with it?

A

bowlby

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

maternal deprivation definition

A
  • when a child (7mths-2.5yrs) is separated from mum, breaking the bond
  • likely to have intellectual, social & emotional development consequences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

more consequences of maternal deprivation

A
  • inability to form attachments in the future
  • affectionless psychopathy
  • delinquency
  • problems with cognitive development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

EVALUATION - rea..

A

+ REAL WORLD APPLS
- kids used to be separated from their parents in hospital with visiting discouraged/forbidden
- this research led to social change in hospital care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

EVALUATION - res..

A

+ RESEARCH SUPPORT
- bifulco et al (1992) = studied maternally deprived women
- 25% later had depression/anxiety compared to 15% in control
- greater when separated pre-6y - supports the notion of a critical period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

EVALUATION - too..

A

TOO SIMPLISTIC?
- rutter (1981) thought this as the term doesn’t take into account whether the bond has been formed in the first place
- argued that, if not, this would have more serious consequences (privation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

EVALUATION - ind..

A

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
barrett (1997) reviewed studies & found securely attached kids often cope pretty well but insecure kids become especially distressed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

when was 44 thieves?

A

1944

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

aim of 44 thieves

A

investigate effects of MD on adolescents to see whether delinquents have suffered from it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

44 thieves procedure

A

interviewed 44 thieves & parents referred to a child protection programme in london
+ 44 control kids - referred to clinic but not yet committed crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

stats of 44 thieves

A
  • in control = 4% had frequent seps before 2
  • affectionless thieves = 86%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

EVALUATION of 44 +

A

support from harlow
read other notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

EVALUATION of 44 —

A

CORRELATIONAL
- external variables like diet, parental income & education exist!!!
BASED ON RETROSPECTIVE MEMS
- reliability?
EXPERIMENTER BIAS
- he worked at the institute & knew the Ps!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly