Lecture 23: New Methods and Future Directions Flashcards

1
Q

social network analysis

A

The process of investigating social structures through the use of networks. It characterizes networked structures or individuals in terms of nodes (individual actors) and the ties, edges, or links (relationships) that connect them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

node

A

entity in a network (dot)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

edge/ tie/ link

A

connection between nodes (line)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

directed edge

A

edge that has an orientation (ex. An arrow indicating popularity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

distance

A

the smallest number of edges needed to connect two notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

centrality

A

importance of a node in the network

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

advantages of social network analyses

A
  • Can provide insight that people may not be able to self-report
  • Can identify popular nodes to target for possible interventions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

limitations of social network analyses

A
  • Analyses will only be as good as how much of the network you cover
  • People belong to multiple networks simultaneously so effects in one network may or may not carry over
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Paluck et al., 2016 social network analysis study aims

A

used a social network approach to design and assess the effectiveness of an anti-bullying intervention. They identified social referents and they reasoned that these social referents would receive more attention from other kids and be looked to for information about group norms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

social referents

A

kids in a school network that had many connections with other kids

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Paluck et al., 2016 social network analysis study method

A

56 middle schools were randomly assigned to a control or an intervention condition. A random sample of students was selected in each school to receive the intervention, which required meeting with a research assistant every other week and discussing common conflict behaviours at school. Throughout the intervention, these seed students are encouraged to become the public face of opposition to these conflicts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Paluck et al., 2016 social network analysis study findings

A

schools in the treatment condition saw less conflict than those in the control condition. The intervention was also more effective when a greater number of the seed students in the intervention condition were also social referents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Parkinson et al., 2017 social network analysis study aims

A

used a social network analysis to see how people encode social networks automatically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Parkinson et al., 2017 social network analysis study method

A
  • A cohort of business school students was surveyed about their social network
  • A subset of participants was passively shown images of other members of the social network while in an fMRI scanner. These faces varied in the degree to which they were distant from the participant in the network
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Parkinson et al., 2017 social network analysis study findings

A
  • Distance in the social network was consistently related to activation in three brain areas
  • The current results indicate that when encountering familiar individuals, humans may retrieve knowledge of where they are located relative to oneself in a social network
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

distributional language analysis

A

Reviewing large bodies of text from culture to identify what words are most likely to co-occur with one another

17
Q

core assumption of distributional language analysis

A

the meaning of a word can be described by the words it co-occurs with (words occurring in similar contexts tend to have similar meanings)

18
Q

advantages of distributional language analysis

A
  • Can provide insight that people may not be able to self-report
  • Allows for possible historical analyses of associations that may have existed before modern measures
19
Q

limitations of distributional language analysis

A
  • Requires a lot of data
  • May be dependent on the type of text you use
  • Cannot know whether the text is supporting or refuting certain associations
20
Q

Lewis & Lupyan, 2020 distributional language analysis study aims

A

investigated the association between the strength of the gender-career stereotype in distributional language analysis and the strength of gender-career IAT effect among participants speaking that language from Project Implicit

21
Q

Lewis & Lupyan, 2020 distributional language analysis study findings

A
  • Language may provide a distinct source of information for learning about pre-existing stereotypes
  • Implicit gender associations of participants in a country is correlated with the gender associations embedded in the dominant language spoken in that country
22
Q

what type of analysis is the Lewis & Lupyan, 2020 study?

A

correlational

23
Q

big data

A

archival analysis that uses a dataset too large to code by hand and instead relies on automatic data collection and analysis

24
Q

advantages of big data

A
  • Same strengths as archival research but with a greater scope
  • Often measures impactful, real-world behaviour, can have access to large amounts of data that make any findings unlikely to be a fluke
25
Q

limitations of big data

A
  • The same limitations of archival research but now with less ability to notice possible errors in data collection
  • Analysis is dependent on the data that are made available and often hard to get at issues of causality
26
Q

Obermeyer et al., 2019 big data study aims

A

investigated enrollment in a “high-risk care management program,” which provides additional resources to patients with complex health needs. Enrollment in the program is primarily determined by a risk algorithm based on patient records, with higher scores leading to automatic enrollment in the program

27
Q

Obermeyer et al., 2019 big data study findings

A

even when Black and White participants had the same risk scores as determined by the algorithm, Black patients had worse objective health measures. For Black and White patients to earn the same risk score, Black patients had 26% more chronic illnesses

28
Q

health costs

A

how much patients spend to maintain their health) to predict overall health

29
Q

why did the algorithm in the Obermeyer et al., 2019 study produce biased results?

A

The algorithm was using health costs to predict overall health. Treating health costs as a proxy for health needs introduced a racial disparity; Black patients generate less healthcare costs than White patients

30
Q

intersectionality

A

the interconnected nature of social categorization such as race, class, and gender, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination; a theoretical approach based on such a premise

31
Q

New York Stop and Frisk Data intersectionality findings

A

racial disparities between the number of Black men stopped per White man increases with height

32
Q

algorithmic bias

A

systematic and repeatable errors in a computer system that create unfair outcomes, such as privileging one arbitrary group of users over others

33
Q

coded bias movie

A

“The past dwells within our algorithms”

34
Q

2 main future directions of intergroup relations

A

intersectionality & algorithmic bias

35
Q

key feature of the Paluck et al., 2016 social network analysis study

A

This intervention lacked an educational or persuasive unit regarding adult-defined problems at school