Lecture 19: Reducing Discrimination l Flashcards
when does intergroup contact work?
- support of authorities
- equal status
- common goals
- cooperation
- contact as individuals
social identity theory
- We strive to achieve & maintain a positive social identity
- We strive to distinguish our own social groups from other social groups
how does social categorization affect prejudice
social categorization precedes prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination
individuation
Perceiving the person as a unique individual individual rather than a group member
recategorization
Changing the basis by which you socially categorize someone
2 methods of recategorization
- focusing on a different social category
- focusing on a common ingroup identity
Mitchell et al., 2003 Black athletes IAT study
had participants complete a Black vs. white or athlete vs. politicians IAT about admired Black athletes and disliked white politicians. In the race IAT, there was a same-race effect. However, in the occupation condition, there wasn’t a racial prejudice effect
example of a common ingroup identity
both being part of the same company
Kunst et al., 2014 Christian and Muslim volunteers study
perceived ingroup commonality between Christian and Muslim volunteers was correlated with lower prejudice & stereotypes
Broockman & Kalla canvasser study
had canvassers go door to door and ask people about their experiences with unfair treatment. They then asked people about their support for transgender people at different time intervals following the treatment and found greater support, particularly immediately after the intervention
analogic perspective-taking
asking someone to recall an experience from their own lives and then sharing one’s own experience
social categorization paradox
For an individual to effectively change stereotypes about their group, they have to:
- Be atypical
- Be perceived as typical of their group
applications of the social categorization paradox
This paradox can also apply to how members of stigmatized groups understand role models
role models study method
had undergraduate women read profiles of women in leadership positions. After reading profiles, students took a survey about their accomplishments, life goals, and personal characteristics. They were assigned two conditions and then took a self-leadership IAT
two conditions of the role models study
- Similar and attainable condition: told participants they were similar to these women leaders and they had the potential to attain these positions
- Dissimilar and unattainable condition: told participants they were dissimilar to these women leaders and they didn’t have the potential to attain these positions