Lecture 19: Reducing Discrimination l Flashcards

1
Q

when does intergroup contact work?

A
  1. support of authorities
  2. equal status
  3. common goals
  4. cooperation
  5. contact as individuals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

social identity theory

A
  • We strive to achieve & maintain a positive social identity
  • We strive to distinguish our own social groups from other social groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how does social categorization affect prejudice

A

social categorization precedes prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

individuation

A

Perceiving the person as a unique individual individual rather than a group member

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

recategorization

A

Changing the basis by which you socially categorize someone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

2 methods of recategorization

A
  • focusing on a different social category
  • focusing on a common ingroup identity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mitchell et al., 2003 Black athletes IAT study

A

had participants complete a Black vs. white or athlete vs. politicians IAT about admired Black athletes and disliked white politicians. In the race IAT, there was a same-race effect. However, in the occupation condition, there wasn’t a racial prejudice effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

example of a common ingroup identity

A

both being part of the same company

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Kunst et al., 2014 Christian and Muslim volunteers study

A

perceived ingroup commonality between Christian and Muslim volunteers was correlated with lower prejudice & stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Broockman & Kalla canvasser study

A

had canvassers go door to door and ask people about their experiences with unfair treatment. They then asked people about their support for transgender people at different time intervals following the treatment and found greater support, particularly immediately after the intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

analogic perspective-taking

A

asking someone to recall an experience from their own lives and then sharing one’s own experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

social categorization paradox

A

For an individual to effectively change stereotypes about their group, they have to:
- Be atypical
- Be perceived as typical of their group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

applications of the social categorization paradox

A

This paradox can also apply to how members of stigmatized groups understand role models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

role models study method

A

had undergraduate women read profiles of women in leadership positions. After reading profiles, students took a survey about their accomplishments, life goals, and personal characteristics. They were assigned two conditions and then took a self-leadership IAT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

two conditions of the role models study

A
  • Similar and attainable condition: told participants they were similar to these women leaders and they had the potential to attain these positions
  • Dissimilar and unattainable condition: told participants they were dissimilar to these women leaders and they didn’t have the potential to attain these positions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

role models study findings

A
  • People in the low similarity condition had higher self-stereotyping IAT scores
  • People in the high similarity condition had lower self-stereotyping IAT scores
17
Q

role models follow-up research

A

higher perceived similarity with counter-stereotypic role models & greater aspirations to follow in their footsteps

18
Q

history of thinking about changing the implicit bias

A

1985-2001: stable & rigid
2001-present: malleable & flexible

19
Q

4 main implicit bias intervention categories

A
  1. counter-stereotypes
  2. controlling bias
  3. values
  4. perspective-taking
20
Q

counter-stereotypes

A

showing people positive depictions of marginalized groups

21
Q

controlling bias

A

reminding people of the importance to not be biased

22
Q

values

A

reminding people of their values toward multiculturalism

23
Q

perspective-taking

A

have people take the perspective of a BLack person

24
Q

what implicit bias intervention categories are effective immediately after the intervention?

A
  • Counterstereotypes and strategies to control bias are effective in reducing implicit prejudice
  • Reflecting on values and perspective-taking are not effective in reducing implicit prejudice
25
Q

what implicit bias interventions are most effective immediately after the intervention?

A
  • Emotional
  • Self-relevant
  • Targeted ingroup favouritism and outgroup hatred
26
Q

how durable are intervention effects for changing implicit bias?

A

After 24 hours, these effects were no longer present

27
Q

are implicit biases durable or malleable?

A

Implicit biases are malleable in the short-term and stable in the long-term

28
Q

what strategies produced a long-term change in implicit bias?

A
  • intergroup contact
  • conditioning
29
Q

Lai, Axt, et al. implicit bias interventions metaanalysis

A

Meta-analysis of 492 studies looking at the effectiveness of various interventions to change biases in implicit associations found that interventions did not produce significant indirect effects. This is not consistent with a causal relationship between change in implicit measures and changes in behaviour

30
Q

alternative approach to discrimination

A

Treat discrimination as a design problem rather than an attitude/belief problem

31
Q

when is discrimination likely to happen?

A

Information is unclear or complex
Decision-making criteria are subjective

32
Q

cultural fit

A

candidates being accepted or rejected because they “don’t fit in”

33
Q

ways to reduce cultural fit

A
  • Align your definition of cultural fit with your goals
  • Ask structured interview questions
  • Create a checklist for indicators of fit
  • Put constraints on how much fit matters
34
Q

how to prevent ambiguity and subjectivity in decision-making

A
  • Pre-commit to decision-making criteria
  • Remove irrelevant group-based information
35
Q

downside of prejudice reduction

A

For disadvantaged group members, reducing prejudice toward the advantaged outgroup through intergroup contact can reduce support for collective action to address inequalities

36
Q

positive contact with advantaged groups leads to

A

Reduced identification with disadvantaged ingroup
Perception that the advantaged outgroup is fair
Perception that the status quo is legitimate

37
Q

Deep canvassing is most related to _____

A

positive intergroup contact