Group dynamics Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define ‘group’

A

A collection of individuals who share a common goal and interact with each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two types of group dynamics?

A

Cohesion and performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two types of cohesion?

A

Task (working together to achieve a goal)

Social (strength of relationships)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the affects on cohesion?

A
  • Do the team share the same ethos/ goals set by the leader?
  • Member characteristics (e.g. personality, age and experience etc.)
  • Sub groups (conflict of interest within a group or team)
  • Size of the group
  • Results
  • Strength and characteristics of the leader
  • Type of cohesion for the type of sport
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do results affect cohesion?

A

Winning increases task cohesion

Losing decrease social cohesion but may motivate players to work together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give examples of type of cohesion for the type of sport

A

Interactive e.g. rugby (better task cohesion)

Coactive e.g. athletics (better social cohesion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Steiner’s model of group performance?

A

Actual performance = potential performance - losses due to faulty processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Steiner mean by ‘faulty processes’?

A
Coordination problems (synchronisation of the group and operational efficiency of each individual working together)
Motivational problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the Ringlemann effect

A

The term given to the hindering of performance due to co-ordination issues specifically the size of the group, as the tam six increases, performance decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How did Ringlemann study the effect?

A

He studied tug-of-war teams, a team of 8 did not exert 8x more force than 1 person, a team of 8 only exerted the same amount of force as a team of 4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define ‘social loafing’

A

When an individual of a team withdraws their effort due to a loss of motivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Tuckman process?

A

Group development through stages of forming, storming, norming and performing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What characteristics did Tuckman focus on in each stage?

A

Decision making, role of the leader, relationship within the group and independence of group members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe the forming stage

A
  • Reliant on leader, some attempt to define the job that needs to be done
  • Leader is a role model of desired behaviour
  • Most people feel anxious so tend to be polite
  • Uncertain roles so look to leader for guidance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the storming stage

A
  • Question authority and hierarchy, some try to take over
  • Leader co-ordinate everyone’s complaints
  • Team members resist task demands
  • Increased confidence to dispute authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the norming stage

A
  • Team collaboration
  • Disagreements resolved by leader
  • Increased tolerance, some restrain from expressing their views to avoid conflict
  • Increased acceptance of others
17
Q

Describe the performing stage

A
  • Roles established
  • Team decisions
  • Some teams may revert to storming stage, most collaborate
  • Share a common focus
18
Q

What are the causes of social loafing?

A
  • Feeling undervalued
  • Lack of feedback
  • Low perception of ability
  • Don’t share the same goals as the group
  • Past experience and results
  • Mental health
  • Perception of other team members not trying