Experience Area C - Detailed Design Flashcards
What are the 9 difference compliance paths?
- Acceptable Solutions.
- Verification Method
- MBIE determination
- product certification
- comparison to a previously accepted
Alternative Solution - expert opinion
- comparison with in-service history
- comparison with a compliance document
- comparison to other documents (New
Zealand standards, BRANZ
Appraisals or manufacturers’
technical information)
Out of the 9 compliance paths, which are “deemed to comply” and which are “to prove compliance”?
To Prove Compliance:
- Comparison with a compliance document
- Comparison to other documents
- Comparison with in-service history
- Expert opinion
- Comparison to a previously accepted Alternative Solution
Deemed To Comply:
- Product certification
- MBIE determination
- Verification method
- Acceptable Solutions
Regarding compliance paths, what does “Product Certification” mean?
Products and methods that are certified under the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s CodeMark scheme.
Multiproof (for standardised designs) and BuiltReady (for modular components built offsite) are two other certification schemes.
Regarding compliance paths, what does “MBIE Determination” mean?
This option involves applying to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment for a determination on whether the proposed Alternative Method will be Building Code-compliant.
A designer can use a past determination as an Alternative Method or as supporting documentation for an Alternative Method
Regarding compliance paths, what does “Verification method” mean?
A Verification Method is a test or calculation method for demonstrating Code compliance.
Verification methods are useful for some aspects of renovation work, such as energy efficiency (modelling method in H1/VM1) and structural performance (structural calculations to the loadings standard AS/NZS 1170 Structural design actions for bracing, framing spans, additional structural supports)
Regarding compliance paths, what does “Acceptable Solutions” mean?
Most Building Code clauses (E2, F4) have Acceptable Solutions that describe how the performance requirements of the particular clause can be met. (include details for E2 for example)
These are not mandatory but, if followed to the letter, they provide a means of demonstrating compliance with the Building Code, and must be accepted by building consent authorities.
Regarding compliance paths, what does “Comparison with a compliance document” mean?
This option is based on an Acceptable Solution or Verification Method, but with minor variations.
The designer compares the performance of the proposed Alternative Method with the performance principles in the Acceptable Solution.
examples include:
- application of flashing cover dimensions that are based on those given in Building Code Acceptable Solution E2/AS1
- subfloor fixings selected in accordance with Section 4 of NZS 3604 for durability
- the proposed use of flexible flashing tape in the preparation of openings
- the proposed use of air seals around windows.
Regarding compliance paths, what does “Comparison to other documents” mean?
This option uses reputable sources such as MBIE determinations and BRANZ appraisals to demonstrate compliance.
This option uses relevant documentation to support an Alternative Method proposal. Documents may include:
- manufacturers’ technical literature
- test results for a system or product
- NZ Standards
- Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment determinations
- BRANZ Appraisals and published information such as Good Practice Guides and bulletins
- overseas or New Zealand literature on building renovation
- historical documents such as catalogues of building components.
Regarding compliance paths, what does “Comparison with in-service history” mean?
This option is helpful where the proposed product or method has been used successfully in similar applications.
The proposed solution must be directly comparable to past history, taking into account use, situation and environment.
When using in-service history as evidence, ensure that:
- the proposed work is sufficiently similar to the cited examples to make a valid comparison
- the in-service history for the product is adequate
- the historical use record has been interpreted by a person with appropriate expertise
- it is relevant to New Zealand
- it is relevant to the specific site and environmental conditions
- it meets or exceeds the current minimum requirements of the Building Code
- the proposed product is the same as the product for which the in-service history is presented (as products may change over time).
Regarding compliance paths, what does “Expert opinion” mean?
Under this option, the designer uses documented support from an appropriately qualified and experienced person or organisation to demonstrate Code compliance. The expert opinion may be a peer review (by a designer experienced in reconstruction of the relevant house type), a BRANZ appraisal or a producer statement.
Regarding compliance paths, what does “Comparison to a previously accepted Alternative Solution” mean?
This option uses an Alternative Solution that a building consent authority has previously accepted.
The documentation must demonstrate that the solution is working in practice, as prior acceptance does not guarantee its performance.
The solution must also be directly comparable and relevant to the proposed situation.
What is an Alternative Solution?
An alternative solution is all or part of a building design that demonstrates compliance with the Building Code, but differs completely or partially from the Acceptable Solutions or Verification Methods.
This where where the 9 paths to compliance comes in! (they are tools for proving the alterative solution).
How many techinical clauses does the Building Code consist of?
three general clauses (classification field uses, interpretation, building importance levels)
and 38 technical clauses
Does each building code techical clause contain both Verification menthods and acceptable solutions?
Generally one or more acceptable solutions and may contain a verification methods
What are “compliance doucments” called now?
Acceptable Solutions and Verrification methods
Why might you use an alterative solution?
- There may not be a Compliance Document for the proposed construction.
- A building may otherwise fall outside the scope of a Compliance Document.
- A building may incorporate unusual design features.
- New materials and methods may have become available.
- Specifically engineered solutions might provide a better means of compliance.
What can the Building Code Clauses sometimes called?
NZ Standards
When developing fire designs with an alternative solution proposal to meet the performance criteria of the Building Code, what entity might be involved, requiring the submission of designs?
New Zealand Fire Service’s
Design Review Unit (DRU).
What is the 5-level structure that the Building Code, Acceptable Solutions and Verification Methods follow?
- Objective
- Funtional Requirement
- Performance Criteria
- Vertification Method
- Acceptable Solution
This is in alignment with international approach to performance-based building regulations.
In each technical clause, how are the requirements explained, and how many levels are utilized to present them? (execpt for Clause C)
Within each technical clause the requirements are explained in three levels:
- Objectives - social objectives from the Building Act
- Functional requirements - functions the building must perform to meet the Objective
- Performance criteria - the performance criteria the building must achieve. By meeting the performance criteria, the Objective and Functional requirement can be achieved.
What does C1 contain as opposed to C2 to C6
Clause C1 contains the Objectives for the Protection from Fire Clauses C2 to C6. Clauses C2 to C6 contain only Functional Requirements and Performances.
Is the NZ Building Code prescritive?
The New Zealand Building Code is a performance-based code. Rather than telling people exactly how to build, it sets out objectives to be achieved.
The Code does not prescribe construction methods, but gives guidance on how a building and its components must perform as opposed to how the building must be designed and constructed.
Are councils able to grant Building Consent Retrospectively?
No
What happens if council finds Unauthorised work?
Council Procedures for Unauthorised Work:
-
Recording and Correction:
- Councils will establish own procedures for recording and correcting unauthorised work.
-
Notice to Fix and Building Consent:
- Notice to Fix may be required, necessitating a Building Consent.
- No Code Compliance Certificate for unauthorised work.
-
Code Compliance Certificate Limitations:
- Unauthorised work details remain public, restricting Code Compliance Certificate issuance.
-
Safe & Sanitary Report:
- Owners may need to provide a “Safe & Sanitary Report” accessible on the property file.
-
Building Consent for Correction:
- Council may demand a Building Consent for corrective work without legitimising the original unauthorised work.
-
Certificate of Acceptance:
- In certain cases, a Certificate of Acceptance may be issued.
What is a certificate of acceptance?
A CoA provides a limited assurance that we are satisfied, on reasonable grounds, that unconsented building work complies with the current New Zealand Building Code.
What is the implication of working on a project without consent on the architect?
- Undertaking work without consent has serious implications for the Architect, property owner, and future owners.
- Unauthorized work may lead to litigation between a third-party purchaser and those responsible for the unauthorized work.
- The Architect should not advise the Owner to apply for a Building Consent after the event; consultation with the Council is the only available remedy.
What are the 4 D’s E2 is based on
- Deflection: The first line of defence is a well designed and constructed cladding system to ‘deflect’ the water away.
- Drainage: A cavity provides a second line of defence by ‘draining’ away water that may leak behind the cladding.
- Drying: By ventilating the cavity, any moisture that has not drained away is removed by ‘drying’.
- Durability: Materials for wall and cavity construction must be sufficiently ‘durable’ to resist decay for a period that will allow time for a leak to be discovered and repaired.
All building work, whether or not it requires a building consent, must still comply
with the Building Code (under section 17 of the Building Act). Building work must also
comply with any other relevant legislation, including:
- Plumbers, Gasfitters, and Drainlayers Act 2006
- Gas (Safety and Measurement) Regulations 2010
- Electricity Act 1992
- Electricity (Safety) Regulations 2010
- Resource Management Act 1991
- Fire Service Act 1975
- Health and Safety at Work Act 2015
Which section of the Building Act deals with exempt work?
Section 41 of the Building Act describes the circumstances in which a building consent is not required, including any of the building work
described in Schedule 1.