EBM - course guide Flashcards

1
Q

Describe the development of EBM

A

methods to critically appraise clinical info and classify it according to strength
concepts emerging from critical appraisal promoted EBM
suggested EBM should be used in clinical practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

criticism of EBM

A

Governments, healthcare commissioners and providers have used the jargon of EBM to justify decisions, directives, or incentives that are seen by clinicians as inappropriate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why is EBM important to clinicians

A

Patient Care Medical Knowledge Practice-Based Learning and Improvement Interpersonal and Communication skills Professionalism

it doesn’t replace clinical decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

hierarchy of studies

A
systematic review and meta analysis 
RCT 
cohort 
case control 
ecological studies 
descriptive/cross sectional studies 
case report/series
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is association

A

the statistical dependence between two variables, that is the degree to which the rate of disease in persons with a specific exposure is either higher or lower than the rate of disease without that exposure.

A link, relationship or correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

chance

A
inference is made from samples rather than the whole population 
to consider chance need to look at: 
sample size
power
P values and statistical significance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is bias

A

a systematic error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2 types of bias

A

measurement and selection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how can you determine if there is a causal effect

A

observed association between exposure and disease

evidence from many sources supports this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the Bradford hill criteria

A
strength 
consistency 
specificity 
temporal relationship 
dose-response relationship 
plausibility 
coherence 
experimental evidence
analogy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

strength

A

magnitude of relative risk
strong association more likely to be causal than weak - could be confounding/bias
weak CAN be causal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

consistency

A
different populations 
different study designs 
but same result 
likely causal
without consistency can still be causal - eg extent of exposure may reduce impact of causal factor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

specificity

A

if an exposure increases the risk of 1 disease but not the other
eg mesothelioma
one to one relationships rare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

temporal relationshop

A

ESSENTIAL

easy to establish from cohort studies but not case control or cross sectional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

dose-response relationship

A

increasing levels of exposure, increase the risk of disease

some have a threshold though instead of a monotonic trend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

plausibility

A

consistant with other knowledge

lack of plausibility may just represent lack of scientific knowledge

17
Q

coherence

A

does not conflict with what is know of natural history

18
Q

experimental knowledge

A

humans - rarely available

animals - different species and levels of exposure

19
Q

analogy

A

source of more elaborate hypothesis about association

lack only represents lack of imagination or experience