Chapter 7 Flashcards

1
Q

observational research

A

naturally occurring variation observed to identify patterns and associations
natural history od disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

type of observational study

A
case series 
ecological
surveys and cross sectional 
case control 
cohort 
qualitative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

experimental research

A

investigator controls 1 factor and measures variation in outcome
clinical trials
impact of preventative vaccines or behaviour change programs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

type of experimental research

A

RCT
cluster RCT
cross over trials
factorial trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

modelling and stimulation research

A

development of theories
validity dependant on data used to set up model parameters
study disease transmission and empirical data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

hierarchy of evidence

A
Systematic review and meta-analysis of trials.
• RCTs.
• Cohort studies.
• Case–control studies.
• Ecological studies.
• Cross-sectional studies.
• Case reports and case series.
• Expert opinion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

exposure

A

describe something that might affect an outcome
explanatory or independent variables
exposure of interest -= one in the hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

outcome

A

response or dependant variables

can have more than 1 outcome per study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

confoiunder

A

independantkly associated with the exposure and outcome of the study
can lead to bias
explanatory or independent variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

bias

A

deviation from the truth that occurs in studies

systematic error is different from random error - increasing the sample size can reduce random error but not bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

selection bias

A

recruit participants based on characteristic linked to exposure and outcome
occurs in allocation to intervention
non-responders different to responders - healthy participant effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

measurement bias

A

systematic errors in measurement including errors in allocation to different groups
systematically wrong - recall bias in case control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

association

A

statistical dependence between 2 variables - indicates the degress to which the outcome is different in those with(out) exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

chance

A

inference from samples
repeat in different sample and results would be different
use CI to determine likelihood of chance being a factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

observer bias

A

RCT

researxher aware of the treatment that the person is getting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

information bias

A

difference in the way that the information is collected and so different qualities between groups of the study

17
Q

non-differential misclassification

A

chance of misclassification is the same regardless of the disease status/exposure
random misclassification
bias association towards null - masks true differences

18
Q

differential misclassification

A

probability of exposure being misclassified depends on the disease status/vice versa
can bias estimates in either direction

19
Q

confounding

A

false association because it distorts the observed association

20
Q

randomisation

A

adjust for confounding at the design stage

distribution of confounding factors should be the same in both groups

21
Q

matching

A

case control

select cases and controls so match on confounding factors

22
Q

adjusting for confounding at analysis stage

A

stratification
standardisation
multiple regression

23
Q

association/causation

A

exclude chance bias and confounding = true association - doesn’t necessarily mean causal

24
Q

Bradford hill criteria

A
strength of association
consistency of association 
specificity of association 
temporal sequence of association 
dose response relationship 
biological plausibility of association 
coherence 
reversibility 
analogy
25
Q

strength

A

measured by RR

stronger = more likely causal

26
Q

consistency

A

repeated demonstration in different populations and study designs

27
Q

specificity

A

1:1 relationship between cause and outcome

28
Q

temporal

A

risk factor before outcome

29
Q

dose response

A

gradient of risk

30
Q

plausibility

A

known biological mechanism

31
Q

coherence

A

absence of conflict with other knowledge about the natural history and disease

32
Q

reversibility

A

remove the risk factor prevent the outcome

33
Q

analogy

A

analogy with other similar causal associations

34
Q

causality and public health

A

absolute proof rarely attainable in empirical sciences

35
Q

how important are causal relationships

A

knowledge of causal mechanism not essential for effective preventative strategies