core guide chapter 4 - meta analysis Flashcards

1
Q

defining the question

A

begin with clearly defined qn

idea of what info source you will use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

searching for resources

A

use bibliographic database
specific search terms eg mesh
combine with Boolean operators - AND, OR, NOT
limit by year/language etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

refining the research

A

use details in qn to guide the search strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

keeping records

A

accurate bibliographic details, search histories, critique details, key info helps you find things again quickly
reference manager, endnote, mendley useful online

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

selecting research

A

depends on the purpose of the article
if want quick ans - l;imit to reviews
if want long answer- read all
inclusion and exclusion criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

appraise

A

read the papers see if
relevant
valid
applicable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

apply research

A

only if valid - discuss reasons why not applying it with patient etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

reference databases

A

organise info on all relevant info on the field
medline Embase and psychinfo - all include biomedical info and some other books and publications
advisable to search more than 1 database

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

citation data

A

citation - reference to another article or source of information
most influential articles are cited the most
information on ISI web of science and google scholher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

conference abstracts

A

published first at conferences may appear in official conference proceedings
accessed through Conference proceedings index 0 through Web of Knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

open access resources

A

publically funded research is in open access

eg pubmed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

evidence based medicine resources

A

see if already been reviewed by a reputable group
Cochrane library - systematic reviews, clinical trials health technology assessments, economic evaluations
BMJ clinical evidence - publish systematic reviews
TRIP database

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

bibliographic software

A

manage all referenced evidence by enabling you to store it in your own database or library
manual cataloguing of references relating to research or topics
automatic collection and organisation of references from bibliographic databases, library catalogues etc
quick searches for a particular reference
search and retrieval of bibliographical subsets
print/save a list of references
integration with word processing software to insert and format citations and bibliographies
format for data sharing and other packages
format according to a particular style
save full text articles and access them anywhere online

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

list of bibliographic resources

A
endnote 
Mendeley 
reference manager 
refworks 
Zotero
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

things to consider in a systematic review

A

address important qn
thorough search
methodological quality assessed and studies weighted
appropriate to combine
publication bias assessed
results interpreted correctly and with a association with the larger picture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

diagnositic test accuracy studies

A

aim defined
used gold standard test
appropriate spectrum of participants
disease status established
methods for test described in enough detail
work up bias avoided
observer bias avoided
CI for sensitivity specificity, P/NPV
could results be influenced by the gold standard test
study findings placed in wider context of other diagnostic tests
relevant to clinical practice.

17
Q

qualitive research studies

A

qn
method appropriate
researchers perspective influence the results
recruitment strategy appropriate for the aims
ethics
transcribed and analysed in a rigorous manner
conclusions justified findings transferablle to other clinical settings
useful insight for clinical practice

18
Q

steps in a systematic review

A
define qn 
search literature 
appraise studies 
extract data 
synthesise data 
report and apply the findings
19
Q

what should a systematic review be based on

A

protocol that is produced before:
qn
description of the search strategy - including databases and search items to be used - methods for search eg contacting authors
details of who will perform the search
method for assessing the quality of the search
description of the data to be extracted
method for synthesising the results - qualitive or narrative report of the findings , tables summarising the populations, quantitive synthesis through meta analysis
plan for reporting and applying the results

20
Q

reporting a systematic review

A

methods of PRIMSA
describe methods
resukts should be in a flow chart
details of included papers in flow charts

21
Q

what is a meta-analysis

A

statistical analysis of a collection of studies
collected through a systematic review
statistical techniques allow quantitive results to be taken by combining results from all individual studies

22
Q

why conduct a meta-analysis

A

individual studies have inconsistent findings

insufficient to ans a research qn or provide evidence to base practice

23
Q

advantages of meta analysis

A
identifies consistant patterns 
include more people 
identify heterogeneity between studies 
explore publication bias 
provide evidence for making decisions
24
Q

extraction …

A

off main result from each study with probability that this is due to chance

25
checking ….
whether appropriate to pool
26
calculation
of summary result as a weighted average across the studies weight takes into account the varience of the study reflects the size of the study greater weight to more informative studies
27
presentation
forrest plots | graphical representation from each study combined with a meta-analysis - combined meta analysis result
28
forest plot
overall estimate is shown at the bottom - diamond centre respond to summary effect esitimate width of diamond = confidence interval
29
clinical check if it is appropriate to pool results
judgement of whether reports are reflecting the same thing and therefore that the results are meaningful and helpful not appropriate if differences in study participants, interventions or outcomes that suggest a different underlying research qn
30
statistical reasons for not pooling
assessed to see if significant variation with respect to populations, exposures, clinical settings, and designs used
31
Galbrith plot
fascilitate the examination of heterogenety regression line through origen represent the pooled estimate with 95% CI - little heterogeneity 95% studies should fall in the lines vertical spread describes the extent of herterogenity and the outliers
32
calculating a pooled result
method depends on whether statistical heterogeneity no heterogeneity - fixed effects model can be used heterogeneity can be allowed for by doing the random effects model to pool estimates
33
fixed model
no evidence of heterogeneity study evaluates common treatment/exposure effect assumes single true/fixed underlying effect
34
random effects model
effects different in different studies distribution of effects from which the study estimates the means of different effects sub groups can be pooled in sub analysis
35
what to watch out for in a metanalysis
false impression of consistency across individual study results systematic variations appropriate to pool? possibility all studies have same systematic error publication bias
36
exploring publication bias
``` effect may be over or underestimated caused when only a subset of information is available funnel plots link between study size and estimate symmetrical = no pub bias ```