Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

GOODLUCK > CM 2 SA PHILO_SHIT > Flashcards

CM 2 SA PHILO_SHIT Flashcards

1
Q

“The safest characterization of western philosophy is that of a
series of footnotes to Plato.”

A

Alfred North Whitehead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

known through the use of five senses.

A

Sensible World

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

known through the use of the intellect paving basis for
knowledge.

A

Intelligible World

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Visible Realm (Opinion)

A

Doxa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Invisible Realm (Knowledge)

A

Episteme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  • What seems to be
  • Sensible world/ world of experience
A

Visible Realm (Opinion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • Genuine Knowledge
  • Intelligible World
A

Invisible Realm (Knowledge)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Imagination

A

Eikasia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Represented by the shadows seen by the prisoners

A

Eikasia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Objects in this realm include poetry and works of art

A

Eikasia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Conviction or belief

A

Pistis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Represented by the names of the shadows that are seen.

A

Pistis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

This include political, moral, and religious belief

A

Pistis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Mathematical Knowledge

A

Dianoia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Objects outsides the cave

A

Dianoia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Understanding of scientific, mathematical, or abstract hypothesis

A

Dianoia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Dialetic Knowledge and metaphysics

A

Noesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Represented by the sun

A

Noesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Grasping of complete and perfect knowledge of the forms of ideas

A

Noesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

“The Paper Chase” An extreme version of this technique
is employed by the infamous
professor

A

, Dr. Kingsfield,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

An extreme version of this technique
is employed by the infamous
professor, Dr. Kingsfield, portrayed
by

A

John Houseman in the 1973
movie, “The Paper Chase.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

is a dialectical method introduced by Socrates

A

The Socratic Method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

is a series of questions and answers that usually
lead to an endless argument

A

The Socratic Method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Socrates use the socratic method on

A

Sophist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

thought that wisdom can be treated as a skill or techne that can be
taught to anyone

A

Sophist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

– were known to be the first professional teachers.

A

Sophist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

sophists treated wisdom as a skill which could be taught
to anyone interested in becoming wise.

A

Skill/techne-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

The 5 stages of socratic Dialog

A

Wonder
Reflect
Refine and cross-examine
Restate
Repeat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

receive what the other person has to say, listen to their view or premise

A

Wonder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Sum up the person’s viewpoint and clarify your understanding of what you have heard.

A

Reflect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Ask the person to provide evidence that supports their view. Discover the thoughts, assumptions and facts underlying their beliefs. Challenge these assumptions to test their validity.

A

Refine and cross-examine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

“Why” questions are frequently used in this stage to identify any fallacies in their reasoning.

A

Refine and cross-examine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

the new assumption resulting from the inquiry.

A

Restate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Start back at the beginning with the new assumptions. This iterative process helps drill the premise down to the core issues in an attempt to strip away all fallacies and to arrive at the truth, best answer, most appropriate decision – whatever you happen to be looking for

A

Repeat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

“In order to examine into the truth, it is necessary, once in one’s life to
doubt of all things, so far as this is possible.”

A

Rene Descartes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

“The safest characterization of western philosophy is that of a
series of footnotes to Plato.”

A

Alfred North Whitehead

36
Q

believed that knowledge Can proceed or start from very few premises or starting points like his model of mathematics.

A

Meditations on First Philosophy

37
Q

believed that the objects that we see, and feel can be
deceiving.

A

Descartes

38
Q

is a form of thinking.

A

Doubting

39
Q

The method of doubting of “ Cogito ergo sum”

A

Skepticism

40
Q

3 Nature of Knowledge

A

Perception > Abstraction > Judgement

41
Q

This stage does not make us different from animals. T

A

Perception

42
Q

2 types of perception

A

Internal and External Perception

43
Q

Imagination and memory.

A

Internal

44
Q

The product is an image or phantasm.

A

Internal

45
Q

Senses that perceive the world.

A

External

46
Q

The product is percept

A

External

47
Q

This stage distinguishes us from animals.

A

Abstract

48
Q

This is sometimes
called simple apprehension.

A

Abstract

49
Q

“simple apprehension is the act of perceiving the object
intellectually, without affirming or denying anything
concerning it. To apprehend is to take hold of the thing as if
with the hand; an apprehension, as an act of the mind, is an
intellectual grasping of an object.”v

A

According to Charles Coppens,

50
Q

“simple apprehension is the act of perceiving the object
intellectually, without affirming or denying anything
concerning it. To apprehend is to take hold of the thing as if
with the hand; an apprehension, as an act of the mind, is an
intellectual grasping of an object.” The product of this
process is called a

A

Concept

51
Q

Once words are associated with
concepts, they are called

A

Terms

51
Q

This stage involves affirming or denying concepts

A

Judgement

52
Q

The act of judgement is combining two or more
concepts together.

A

Putting two or more concepts together to
make a statement or proposition.

53
Q

This completes the act of the mind for knowledge to become
possible

A

Judgement

54
Q

2 Types of Statements

A
  • Analytic Statements
  • Empirical Statements
55
Q

The truth or falsity of the knowledge claim being
made by

A

Analytic Statement

56
Q

are also identified as truths of
language, truths of reason, maters of logic, A Priori, or
formal statements.

A

Analytic Statement

57
Q

Its truth or falsity depends on the state of affairs being
claimed.

A

Empirical Statement

58
Q

You will not be able to discover the truth of the statement
by mere analysis of the key terms but you have to go
outside of the statement and to look and to see whether
the state of affairs claimed actually corresponds with the
empirical world.

A

Empirical Statement

59
Q

It is also identified as truths of fact, synthetic, matters of
fact, or a posteriori.

A

Empirical System

60
Q

2 types of knowledge

A

Formal and emperical knowledge

61
Q

Includes mathematics, logic, linguistics etc.

A

Formal knowledge

62
Q

Method of validation depends entirely on the particular
system being used.

A

Formal knowledge

63
Q

Includes hard sciences and soft sciences

A

Emperical Knowledge

64
Q

Takes emphasis and makes useof the data or the content from experience and its correspondence with the state of
affairs to establish the truth or falsity of their knowledge
claims from these empirical sciences.

A

Emperical knowledge

65
Q

can often be used to mislead people

A

Logical fallacies

66
Q

Unfairly attacking a person instead of the issue. Attacking the character and/or reputation of a position’s supporters; “Guilty by association

A

Ad Hominem (Argument Against Man)

67
Q

Occurs when an opponent’s position is misinterpreted to make it easier to critique. Just like a …. resembling an actual man, an argument is presented
that resembles the original argument but is not the actual
argument.

A

Strawman

68
Q

This line of reasoning
fails by limiting the options to two when there are in fact more
options to choose from. Sometimes the choices are between one thing, the other thing, or both things together (they don’t
exclude each other).

A

False Dilemma/False Dichotomy -

69
Q

When a person’s argument is just repeating what they already assumed beforehand, it’s not arriving at any new conclusion. We call this a circular argument or circular reasoning.

A

Circular Argument/ Begging the Question (Petitio
principii)

70
Q

are typically related to the issue in question but aren’t quite relevant enough to be
helpful. Instead of clarifying and focusing they confuse and
distract

A

Red Herring (Ignorantio Elenchi) -

71
Q

Fallacy assumes something is true (or right, or good) because other people agree with it. A couple different fallacies can be
included under this label, since they are often
indistinguishable in practice.

A

Bandwagon Fallacy (Argumentum ad Populum) -

72
Q

Personal attacks, and emotional appeals, aren’t strictly relevant to whether something is true or false. In this case, the fallacy
appeals to the compassion and emotional sensitivity of others
when these factors are not strictly relevant to the argument.

A

Appeal to Pity (Argumentum ad Misericordiam)

73
Q

This fallacy happens when we misuse an authority. This misuse of authority can occur in a number of ways. We can cite only authorities—steering conveniently away from other testable and concrete evidence as if expert opinion is always correct. Or we can cite irrelevant authorities, poor authorities, or false authorities.

A

Appeal to Authority (Argumentum ad Verecundiam) -

74
Q

True and real knowledge exist in the

A

World of forms

75
Q

describes the process of the
enlightenment of the soul

A

The Allegory of the Cave

76
Q

This ascent of the soul from the
world of opinion to the world of knowledge is called

A

Plato’s
Divided line

77
Q

the Allegory of the Cave
represents

A

Plato’s approach to ideas

78
Q

“You wouldn’t understand since you have never struggled”

A

Ad hominem(Arguments against man)

79
Q

” You think we should invest more in education? So, you must be suggesting that we throw unlimited funds at school without any accountability or oversight”

A

Strawman Fallacy

80
Q

“therefore, flying saucers don’t exist”

A

Appeal to ignorance

81
Q

“All or nothing”

A

False dilemma/ false dochotomy

82
Q

“It is time you go to bed because it is your bedtime”

A

Circular argument/ begging the question

83
Q

“In order to really look at the problem of Global warming, we must first consider how the homeless suffer when it is cold.”

A

Red herring/ Ignorantio elenchi

84
Q

” I want an ipad because that where the all celebrity have”

A

Bandwagon (Argumentum ad populum)

85
Q

“i’am positive that my work will meet your requirements. I really need the job since my grandmother is sick.”

A

Appeal to pity( Argumentum ad misericordiam)

86
Q

“I need to detox!My chiropractor said everyone should.”

A

Appeal to authority (Argumentum)

GOODLUCK (27 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions