Classical & Operant Conditioning Flashcards
C and UC S & R
UCS: food
UCR: salivate
CS: bell
CR: salivation from bell
Ivan Pavlov
Dog salivation, bell ringing, food
Acquisition (classical conditioning)
Period during which an organism learns the association of the stimuli
Extinction (classical conditioning)
Loses unconditioned response (eventually stops salivating at the sound of the bell)
Spontaneous recovery
After extinction, if you give the subject a period of rest, and then present the CS (bell) again, the UCR will again occur but at a weak level (salivate)
Generalization (classical conditioning)
Tendency for stimuli similar to the CS to elicit the CR.
Ex. Dog might salivate to bell of different pitch or timbre.
Second-order conditioning
a neutral stimulus is paired with a conditioned stimulus (rather than an unconditioned stimulus)
Ex. Flash of light before bell and dog will learn to salivate at flash of light
Can even do third order by presenting, say, a metronome before the flash of light and the dog will learn to salivate to metronome
Sensory preconditioning
Two neutral stimuli are paired together, then one of the neutral stimuli is paired with an UCS.
Ex. flash of light paired first with bell; then bell is paired with food –> bell and flash of light independently elicit salivation
Robert Rescorla (late 1960s)
Performed experiments suggesting that classical conditioning was a matter of learning signals for the UCS; this approach is called the “contingency explanation of classical conditioning”
The CS and UCS become associated when the CS (bell) is a good predictor of the UCS (food).
Criticism of Rescorla’s explanation of CC:
Blocking
The CS and UCS must not only be contingent, the CS must also provide nonredundant information about the occurrence of the UCS in order for conditioning to occur.
Blocking: Experimental Procedure
First stage: rats heard hissing noise and then given shock. After repetition, rats showed fear at hissing alone.
Second stage: Hissing noise and light presented at the same time, followed by UCS (shock). When light was presented alone, rat did not show fear (light did not become associated with shock)
Suggests that the light did not provide additional information useful for predicting the shock –> rats ignored the light. Conclusion: CS must not only be contingent with UCS, but must provide USEFUL (nonredundant) information about the occurrence of the UCS
Operant Conditioning
“instrumental conditioning” or reward learning; learn the relationship between a behavior and its consequence
E. L. Thorndike
law of effect (proposed around 1900): if a response is followed by an unwanted or bothersome consequence, the animal will reduce likeliness for same response in the future
B. F. Skinner
Rejected Thorndike’s terms like “satisfying” or “annoying” in terms of the consequence. Replaced the concepts with four types of consequences: PR, NR, PP, NP (“extinction”)
Positive and Negative Reinforcement
To increase probability of behavior PR: behavior is rewarded Two types of NR: escape & avoidance Escape: removes undesirable stimulus Avoidance: avoids undesirable stimulus (ex. stopping at stop sign to AVOID ticket/accident)