Chem II: 6-10 Flashcards
lewis acid
electron acceptor
tend to be electrophiles
vacant p orbitals that can accept electron pair
lewis base
electron donor
tend to be nucleophiles
have lone pair of electrons that can be donated
coordinate covalent bonds
covalent bonds in which both electrons in the bond came from the same starting atom (lewis base)
when lewis acid and bases interact
amphoteric
molecules that can act as either bronsted lowry acids or bases
ex: water
acid dissociatio constant
Ka
measures strength of an acid in solution
dissociation of acid HA
HA = H+ + A-
pKa of more acid molecules
smaller or negative pKa
pKa of more basic molecules
larger pKa
main functional groups that act as acids
alcohols, aldehydes and ketones (at alpha carbon), carboxylic acids and most derivatives
main functional groups that act as bases
amines and amides
nucleophiles
have either lone pairs or pi bonds that can form new bonds to electrophiles
tend to be good bases
strength based on rate of rxn - kinetic property
the more basic the nucleophile, the more ___ it is
reactive
factors that contribute to nucleophilicity
- charge: inc with inc electron density (more neg charge)
- electronegativity: dec as electroneg inc (bc less likely to share electron density)
- steric hindrance: dec as molecule is bulkier
- solvent: protoic solvents hinder
electrophile
- electron loving species with a positive charge or positively polarized atom
- accepts an electron pair when forming new bonds with a nucleophile
- usually act as lewis acids
- better leaving groups make it more likely that a rxn will happen
electrophilicity of carboxilic acid derivatives
most reactive to least: anhydrides, carboxilic acids, esters, amides
leaving groups
- retain the electrons after heterolysis
- stabilize extra electrons
- weak bases and conjugate bases of strong acids are GLGs
heterolytic rxns
- opposite of coordinate covalent bond formation
- a bond is broken and both electrons are given to one of the 2 products
nucleophilic subsitution reactions
SN1 and SN2
nucleophile forms a bond with a substrate carbon and LG leaves
SN1 steps
- LG leaves, making a carbocation: rate limiting step
- nucleophile attacks carbocation
SN1
- first order reaction
- loss of leaving group to make carbocation intermediate then nucl attack
- produce usually racemic mixture
- varied sterochemsitry bc nucl can attack C+ from either side
- most likely to occur on tertiary carbons (C+ easily stabilized)
SN2
- one step -> concerted rxn
- backside attack
- inversion
- stereospecific reaction
- 1° and 2° NOT 3° carbons
stereospecific reaction
configuration of reactant determines the configuration of the product due to the reaction mechanism
SN2 steps
how must the nucleophile and LG be related in order for a substitution reaction to proceed?
a substitution reaction will proceed when the nucleophile is a stronger base (more reactive) than the LG
what trends increase electrophilicity
greater positive charge snd better LGs –> make reaction more likely to proceed
features of GLGs
stabilize electra electrons
weak bases, resonance stabilization, electron withdrawing groups
chemoselectivity
preferential reaction of one function group in the presence of other functional groups
steric hindrance
prevention of reactions at a particular location within a molecule due to the size of substituent groups
SN1 vs SN2
mechanism
- SN2: single step, no intermediate, one transition state,
- lvg group departs as nucl adds (concerted)
- SN1: not single step, C+ intermediate (rate determining step)
- lvg grp leaves first –> C+ –> then nucl adds
SN1 vs SN2
kinetics
- SN2: bimolecular
- rate = k [nucl][RX]
- SN1: unimolecular
- rate = k [RX]
SN1 vs SN2
sterochemistry
- SN2: every substitution goes with inversion at carbon undergoing substitution
- SN1: mix of inversion and retention
- loss of configuration
SN1 vs SN2
electrophile scope
SN2:
- Best: Me-X
- Good: 1° R-X
- Possible: 2° R-X
- NO: 3° R-X
SN1:
- Best: 3° R-X
- Possible: 2° R-X
- Unlikely: 1° R-X
- NO: Me-X
SN1 vs SN2
solvent effect
- SN2: more polar solvent = rate inc or dec
- SN1: more polar solvent = inc rate
protection o fLGs
can temporarily maks a LG with sterically bulky group during synthesis
what are the 2 reactive centers of carbonyl containing compounds
carbonyl carbon -> electrophilic
alpha hydrogens -> acidic
what to consider for sterospecificity
consider whether configuration of reactant necessarily leads to specific configuration
what to consider for stereoselectivity
- if more than one product, major product will be determined by differences in strain or stability
- more striained molecules (with significant angle, torsional, or nonbonded strain) are less likely to form
- products with conjugation (alternating single and multiple bonds) are significant more stable
steps to problem solving
- nomenclature
- identify functional groups
- good nucleophiles, electrophiles, LGs, acid/bases
- identify other reagents
- same qs ^
- identify most reactive functional groups
- more oxidized arbons tend to be more reactive to both nucleo-electro rxns and redox rxns
- identify first step of rxn
- consider stereospecificity/stereoselectivity
alpha hydrogen
connected to alpha carbon
easily lost hydrogens –> acidic –> resonance stabilized conjugate base
alpha carbon
adjacent to carbonyl carbon
carbanion
molecule with negatively charged atom
alpha hydrogens of ketones vs aldehydes
alpha hydrogens slightly less acidic than aldehydes because of electron donating property of additional alkyl group in ketone –> destabilizes carbanion
aldehyde vs ketone reactivity
aldehydes slightly more reactive to nucleophiles than ketones because of steric hindrance in ketone –> makes higher energy, crowded intermediate
why are the alpha hydrogens of aldehydes and ketones acidic?
- inductive effects
- electronegative oxygen pulls electron density from C-H bond, weakening it
- resonance effects
- once deprotonated, resonance stabilization of neg charge between alpha carbon, carbonyl carbon, and electron withdrawing carbonyl oxygen increases stability
tautomers
constitutional isomers that differ from each other in the placement of a proton and the position of a double bond
enol
C-C double bond and alcohol
acidity at alpha carbon
enolate
conjugate base of enol
acidity at alpha carbon
enolization/tautomerization
process of interconverting from keto to enol tautomer
solutions to form enolate carbanion
common strong bases: OH, LDA, KH
michael addition
enolate attacks alpha beta unsaturated carbonyl
formation of new C-C bond
michael addition
electrophile
alpha beta unsat carbonyl
michael addition
nucleophile/michael acceptor
enol/enolate
michael addition
mechanism
kinetically controlled product
- formed more rapidly
- less stable
- favored with:
- rapid irreversible reactions
- lower temperatures
- strong, sterically hindered base
kinetic enolate
double bond on less substituted alpha carbon
thermodynamically controlled product
- formed more slowly
- more stable
- favored with:
- higher temperatures
- slow reversible reactions
- weaker, smaller bases
thermodynamic enolate
double bond with more substituted alpha carbon
enamination
imine
enamine
tautomers of imines
which tautomer of aldehydes and ketones is thermodynamically favored: keto or enol?
keto
aldol condensation
adding aldehyde/ketone to carbonyl of another
aldehyde or ketone acts as both electrophile and nucleophile
end result: C-C bond
aldol condensation
mechanism
aldol
molecule that condanes an aldhehyde and alcohol functional groups
condensation reaction
two molecules are joined with tthe loss of a small molecule
dehydration raction
water is lost
retro aldol reaction
aqueous base added and heat is applied
break bond between alpha and beta carbon of carbonyl
If you started with a chiral α-carbon, could tautomerization affect its chirality?
(A) Yes, because interconverting between the keto and enol forms can completely change the chirality to the opposite orientation (S->R).
(B) Yes, because interconverting between the keto and enol forms can create a racemic mixture of the α-carbon’s chirality center.
(C) No, because tautomerization is focused on the carbonyl carbon and cannot effect the α-carbon.
(D) No, because after any number of tautomerizations, the α-carbon will still retain its chirality.
(B) Yes, because interconverting between the keto and enol forms can create a racemic mixture of the α-carbon’s chirality center.
This effect is actually called α-racemization.
In an enolate formation reaction, the pKa of the α-hydrogen is 16.42 and the pKa of the resulting alcohol is 19.89. What is the Keq for this reaction? Will this reaction favor products or reactants?
(A) 29,512
(B) 2,951.2
(C) 295.12
(D) 29.512
(B) 2,951.2
pKeq = pKa(r) - pKa(p) pKeq = 16.42 - 19.89 pKeq = -3.47
Keq = 10^-pKeq Keq = 10^3.47 Keq = approx. 4700 (actual: 2,951.2) Thus, products are HIGHLY favored.
Why is the pKa of a ketone higher than an aldehyde?
The Methyl group donates electron density toward the carbonyl group, making it less willing to accept electrons from the α-hydrogen.
Draw the energy diagram a reaction as it goes to the thermodynamic product and as it goes to the kinetic product.
Why is the thermodynamic enolate more stable?
The thermodynamic enolate is more stable because it is more substituted.
The kinetic product is favored by a ________ base at _______ temperatures. Why is this the case?
(A) Bulky, High
(B) Bulky, Low
(C) Small, High
(D) Small, Low
(B) Bulky, Low
The kinetic product is favored by a bulky base at low temperatures. This is because the kinetic product is not sterically hindered, which results in a low activation energy; thus you only need a low temperature.