Chapter 5 Flashcards
Why was the moderate liberal opposition a small group
- Majority of population were not literate - 21% by 1897 census
- Those who were literate may not have the time and wealth to travel, and see firsthand the political stagnatation of Russia
What weakened the Moderate Liberal Opposition
- Seperation from within
- Westerns wanted to adopt ‘western ways’
- Slavophiles wanted to maintain Slavic principals and the power of the Church
How threatening was the Moderate liberal opposition to the Tsar
- Not very
- Wanted to reform autocracy, not remove it
What encouraged a sudden growth of opposition from c1870
- Relaxation in censorship, education and reform in judicial system
- Hope and dissapointment then strong repression under Alexander II and Alexander III
What was a notable radical opposition group under Alexander II + Alexander III
- Young Russia developed as the younger generation wanted to go further than their parents
- In 1862, they set fires in St Petersburg, destroying over 2000 shops
Who were the most prevelant radical thinkers under Alexander II and Alexander III,
- Cherneyshevsky
- Herzen
- Bakunin
- Bakunin translated Marx’s communist manifesto into Russian
Why were radical thinkers not significant opposition
- Those who could read were mostly nobles or benefitted from autocracy
- Ideas like Marxism didn’t benefit them
Evidence to show that radical thinkers were not that threatening under Alexander II and Alexander III
- The Tchaikovsky Circle was set up in 1868 in St Petersburg
- Distributed Marx’s ‘Das Kapital’
- But had no more than 100 members
When was the first incidence of Populism
- 1874
- Lavrov led 200 men into the countryside to persuade them the future of the country depended on the devlopment of the peasant commune
Aims of populists
Exploit the resentment felt about land redistribution after emancipation, and high taxes
Why did populism fail
The peasants ill-education, superstition, and deep-rooted loyalty to the tsar, due to the Orthodox Church meant that they were quickly reported to the authorities
Why was the populist movement, despite being a faliure, significant to the opposition under Alexander II and Alexander III
Took radical opposition away from underground meeting rooms
When and why was ‘Land and Liberty’ established
- 1877
- Continue the populist tradition
Why was Land and Liberty threatening to autocracy, but what is limiting about this
- Talks between the group and the zemstva to place pressure on the autocracy for consitutional reform
- Group split in 1879, just two years after founding in 1877