Chapter 10 Flashcards
What contributed to the growth in Liberal Opposition under Nicholas II
A rapidly developing middle class
When central group for Liberal Opposition created under Nicholas II
1903 - Union of Liberation founded under Pyotor Struve
Aims of liberal under Nicholas II
Reform to constitutional system whereby urban workers can campaign legally for their rights
How much of a threat were the liberals under Nicholas II
Not a threat to rule, but to his autocracy, as they contributed to the momentum that was building for change
What weakened the liberals under Nicholas II
Easily appeased by the Duma’s introduction in 1905
Regarding the liberal opposition, what shows Nicholas’s reluctance to anything other than total autocracy
Being reluctant to grant even the liberals concessions, who weren’t trying to diminish his autocracy
When were the SR’s established
The SR party was established in 1901, with Chernov being their most prominent intellectual
Membership and aims of SR’s under Nicholas II
Fairly loose organisation, with groups with a wide variety of views, broadly accepting Marxist and populist ideas
Main belief of the SR’s
Put forward the view that the interests of the peasants and workers were identical and that they should work together to bring about land redistribution and destroy autocracy
What weakened the SR’s under Nicholas II
- Yevno Azef was a double agent who inflitrated the party
- Over 4500 SR’s were sentenced to death between 1905-09
Evidence of how threatening the SR’s were
Carried out 2000 political assasinations between 1901-05, including tow Ministers of Internal Affairs, and Prime Minister Stolypin in 1911
How much of a threat were the SR’s to Nicholas II’s autocracy
Very - wanted to remove autocracy and dangerous with assasinations
When were the SD’s established
1898 as an amalgamation of various Marxist groups
Why was Lenin exiled to Siberia in the 1890s
Wrote Marxist pamphlets and organised strikes among factory workers
What weakened the SD’s under Nicholas II
- Lenin and Martov had opposing ideas on how the party should be run
- Lenin had total commitment to revolution only, and should lead the proleteriat in doing so
- Martov thought the impetus for change must come from the workers themselves
- Split by 1903