Chapter 2: Research Methods Flashcards

1
Q

system 1 thinking

A

-intuitive thinking
-quick, reflexive, “gut hunches”
-relies on heuristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

heuristics

A

a mental shortcut or rule of thumb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

system 2 thinking

A

analytical thinking, slow + reflective, effortful, override intuitive thinking sometimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

when we conduct science, we are mainly using which type of thinking?

A

system 2 thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

random selection

A

procedure that ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
-crucial for generalizing our results to the broader population
-smaller but more random sample is better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

evaluating measures

A

based on reliability + validity
-we want to aim for reliable + valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

reliability

A

consistency of measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

validity

A

the extent to which a measure assesses what is purports to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

replicability

A

the ability to duplicate the original findings consistently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

replicability crisis

A

failure to confirm a # of high profile findings within the field of psychological science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

reproductivity

A

the ability to review + reanalyze the data from a study + find exactly the same results
-repeating the same statistical analysis on already-collected data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

naturalistic observation

A

-watching participants’ behavior in real-world settings without trying to manipulate their actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

external validity

A

the extent to which our findings generalize to real-world settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

internal validity

A

the extent to which we can draw cause + effect inferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

naturalistic observation is high/low in external validity + high/low in internal validity

A

high in external validity
low in internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

case study design

A

-examining 1 or a small # of people, often over an extended period of time
-typically anecdotal; can’t infer causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

case study has low/high internal validity

A

low internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

self-report measures

A

-used to assess a variety of characteristics, such as personality traits, mental illnesses, + interests
-cheap + easy to administer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

surveys

A

measure people’s opinions + attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

disadvantages of self-report measurs

A

-assume the respondents possess enough insight into their personality characteristics to report on them accurately which is not necessarily the case
-respondents may engage in response sets
-malingering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

response sets

A

the tendencies to distort their answers to questions in a way that paint them in positive light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

malingering

A

the tendency to make ourselves appear psychologically disturbed to achieve a clear-cut personal goal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

halo effect

A

the tendency of ratings of 1 positive characteristics to “spill over” to influence the ratings of other positive characteristic

24
Q

horns effect

A

opposite of halo effect

25
correlational design
research design that examines the extent to which 2 variables are associated
26
correlation
a measure of the relationship between 2 variables
27
negative correlation
as the value of one variable changes, the other goes in the opposite direction
28
positive correlation
as the value of one variable changes, the other goes in the same direction
29
zero correlation
scattered
30
perfect correlation
close to a linear line
31
describe correlation coefficients
range from -1 to 1 with the absolute value indicating the strength of the relationship
32
scatterplot
grouping of points on a 2 dimensional graph in which each do represents a single person's data
33
illusory correlation
the perception of a statistical association between 2 variables where none exists
34
what forms the basis of many superstitions?
illusory correlation
35
placebo effect
improvement resulting from the mere expectation of imporvement
36
nocebo effect
harm resulting from the mere expectation of harm -the expectation of pain can itself create pain
37
the experimenter expectancy effect
researchers' hypotheses lead them to unintentionally bias the outcome of a study
38
demand characteristics
cues that participants pick up from a study that allow them to generate guesses regarding the researcher’s hypothesis
39
informed consent
a procedure in which researchers must tell subjects what they're getting into before asking them to participate
40
deception
when researchers deliberately mislead participants about the study's design or purpose -participants should be informed of the deveption soon after the deception takes place
41
statistics
application of mathematics to describing + analyzing data
42
central tendency
-mean -median -mode
43
mean
average of all scores
44
median
the middle score after ordering the scores from lowest to highest
45
mode
most frequent score
46
positive skew
mean > mode -thick on left
47
negative skew
mode > mean -thick on right
48
variability
measurs how loosely/tightly bunched the scores are
49
range
difference between the highest/lowest scores
50
standard deviation
considers how far each data point is from the mean
51
statistical significance
the result is believable
52
practical significance
the result has real-world importance
53
meta-analysis
statistical method that analyzes effects across studies to determine consistent patterns of results
54
2 ways statistics can be misused
-reporting measures of central tendency that are non-representative of most participants -creating visual representations that exaggerate effects
55
sharpening
the tendency to exaggerate the gist, or central message, of a study
56
leveling
the tendency to minimize the less central details of a study
57
pseudosymmetry
o the appearance of a scientific controversy where none exists