***Chapter 12: Social Psychology Flashcards
social psychology
the study of how people influence others’ behavior, beliefs, + attitudes
need-to-belong theory
-humans have a biologically based need for interpersonal connections
-threat of social isolation can lead to self-destructive behavior + may impair our mental functioning
-the pain we experience in response to social rejection may be similar in some ways to physical pain
-long-term loneliness can exert negative, at times devastating, effects on our psychological adjustment (depression, early death, cognitive decline, risk for Alzheimer’s disease)
social comparison theory
we need to evaluate our abilities + beliefs by comparing them with those of others
upward social comparison
we compare ourselves with people who seem superior to us in some way
downward social comparison
we compare ourselves with people who seem inferior to us in some way
upward or downward social comparison
“If he can achieve that, I bet I can too”
upward
upward or downward social comparison
“It’s not that I am dumb, it’s that he’s incredibly smart”
upward
upward or downward social comparison
“I am a big fish in a small pond”
downward
upward or downward social comparison
“I won the third place, but she did not even make it to the final!”
downward
social contagion
we look to others when a situation is ambiguous + we’re not sure what to do
mass hysteria
a contagious outbreak of irrational behavior that spreads much like a flu epidemic
collective delusions
many people simultaneously convinced of bizarre things that are false
urban legends
false stories repeated so many times that people believe them to be true
mass hysteria, collective delusions, or urban legends
In 1954, thousands of Seattle residents became alarmed by tiny pits in their car windshields which they suspected as the result of secret nuclear tests performed by the federal government
collective delusions
mass hysteria, collective delusions, or urban legends
While still alive, Walt Disney arranged to have his body frozen after his death so that it could be unfrozen at a future date when advanced technology will permit him to live again
urban legends
mass hysteria, collective delusions, or urban legends
In 2013, a single fake tweet proclaimed that President Barack Obama had been seriously injured following an attack on the White House. The U.S. financial markets quickly plunged by $130 billion
mass hysteria
social factilitation
even the mere presence of others can enhance our performance in certain situations (on easy tasks)
example of social facilitation
bicycle racers obtained faster speeds when racing along with other bicyclists than when racing against only the clock
social disruption
a worsening of performance in the presence of others, occurs on tasks we find difficult
example of social disruption
we get “choked” in the company of others while telling a joke with a complicated punch line
attribution
assigning causes to behavior
dispositional/internal attribution
attributing behavior to enduring characteristics, such as personality traits, attitude, or intelligence
situational/external attribution
attributing behavior to what’s going on around them
dispositional/internal or situational/external attribution
I missed the bus because I got up late
dispositional/internal
dispositional/internal or situational/external attribution
he is such a careless driver. He never watches out for other cars
dispositional/internal
dispositional/internal or situational/external attribution
I missed the bus because the bus arrived earlier than scheduled
situational/external
dispositional/internal or situational/external attribution
he probably has something emergent that he is driving so fast
situational/external
fundamental attribution error (FAE)
the tendency to overestimate the impact of dispositional influences + underestimate the impact of situational influences on others’ behavior
when do we tend to commit FAE
when explaining others’ behavior
-less so when explaining the causes of our own behavior
Japanese + Chinese are more/less prone to FAE than people in Western cultures
less prone
conformity
the tendency of people to alter their behavior as a result of group pressure
Asch study
-participants told this as a study of perceptual judgements
-participants in group asked to compare + match line lengths
-confederates picked the wrong line
-75% of participants in the original Asch study conform to the incorrect norm on at least 1 of the 12 trials
what 3 things influence conformity
-uniformity of agreement
-difference in the wrong answer
-size
influences on conformity
uniformity of agreement
if all confederates gave the wrong answer, the participant was more likely to conform
influences on conformity
difference in the wrong answer
knowing that someone else in the group differed from the majority made the participant less likely to conform
influences on conformity
size
people were no more likely to conform in a group of 10 than in a group of 5
what does Asch’s study show us
that many of us can + do resist the power of the group
what do brain imagining studies suggest about conforming behavior
conforming behavior was associated with activities in the amygdala (anxiety), parietal + occipital lobes (visual perception)
low self-esteem is related to being more/less prone to conformity
more
Asians are more/less likely to comply to group norms
more
is there a significant gender difference in conformity
no
deindividuation
the tendency of people to engage in atypical behavior when stripped of their usual identities
example of deindividuation
posting something on Instagram different than how you converse with your friends; you may text different than you speak face to face
deindividuation is due to what
a feeling of anonymity + lack of personal responsibility
Stanford prison study
-subjects randomly assigned role of guard or prisoner
-guards began to treat prisoners cruelly, subject them to harsh punishments, + become increasingly sadistic
-many prisoners began to display signs of depression, hopelessness, + anger
-study stopped early
groupthink
an emphasis on group unanimity at the expense of critical thinking
-viewpoint diversity (valueing a range of different perspectives) is crucial to groupthink
-encourage dissent within an organization (devil’s advocate) to avoid groupthink
-doesn’t always lead to bad decisions, just overconfident ones
3 examples of groupthink
-Holocaust in WW2
-collapse of Swissair
-mass resignation of the Major League Umpires Association