Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

PY > Chapter 12 > Flashcards

Chapter 12 Flashcards

1
Q

personality psychology

A

study of internal causes of behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

social psychology

A

study of interactive causes of behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

sociology

A

impact of group membership on behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

social influence

A

process through which the real or implied presence of others can directly or indirectly influence the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of an individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

conformity

A

changing one’s own behavior to match that of another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

muzafer sharif study

A

autokinetic effect
how far did the light move?
impact of others’ opinions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

solomon asch study

A

classic conformity study
when confederates gave wrong, the subject also gave the wrong answers 33% of the time
cultural differences
gender differences: women conform more than men

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

why conformity

A

normative influence: desire to be liked
informational influence: desire the be right
most conformity is desirable (traffic lights)
most lethal when conform to self-destruction (drugs, smoke, over-eating, lazy) and other-destructive (bullying, racism, gang violence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

group think

A

people place more importance on maintaining group cohesiveness than on assessing the facts of the situation under consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

famous group think examples

A

Pearl Harbor Attack 1941
bay of pigs disaster 1962
challenger diaster 1987
war in Iraq 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

irving janis

A

groupthink founder
book says what not to do, most describe positive steps to avoid lethal effect of group think
- leader appreciated might be wrong
- withhold opinion initially as to not influence others
- encourage alternative perspectives
- devils advocate
- outside expert to express opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

group polarization

A

group comes up w decision that are more extreme than the average of the members
- conservative, more conservative (status quo)
- liberal, more liberal (risky)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

robert zajonc

A

social faciliation and social inhibition
presence of others -> increase level of arousal
a) dominate response correct: social facilitation
b) dominate response wrong: social inhibition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

social loafing

A

do less when others are around
reduced when:
- boss present
- worker is self-motivated
- outcome of work important
- individuals are measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

deindividuation

A

lynch mobs are made
lose personal identity in the context of a group
do things an individual would not have done by themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

compliance

A

changing behavior as a result of other people directing or asking for the change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

burt raven

A

bases of social power- ability to get someone to comply with your request
- reward
- coercion
- legitimate authority
- expertise
- referent power
- informational power
- appeal to 3rd party
- helplessness
- environmental manipulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

sale techniques

A

foot in the door (small to large)
door in the face (large to small)
lowball technique (get it, then raise)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

obedience

A

changing behavior at the command of an authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

stanley milgram

A

obedience study at 29
stimulated by trial of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann who was just “following orders”
teacher (subject) /learner (confederate)
teacher told to increase shock if answer wrong
results: 2/3 all the way
conclusion: ordinary people can commit atrocity when under the influence of an authority figure
ethical concerns: subjects shaken, continued to shock innocent person- guilt, never thought “posed”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

social cognition

A

mental processes that people use to makes sense of the social world around them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

attitude

A

tendency to response positively or negatively toward certain person, object, idea, or situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

ABCs of attitude

A

Affect- emotion
Behavior
Cognitions

24
Q

Richard LaPiere

A

attitude poor predictor of behavior
Chinese student and restaurant
refused service twice
when wrote back 92% said wouldn’t serve a Chinese person
attitude-behavior consistency study

25
Q

attitudes formed by

A
  • direct contact
  • direct instruction
  • interaction w others
  • principles of reinforcement, association, and modeling
26
Q

protataxic thinking

A

relating to or being thinking that is lacking in self-awareness and in perception of temporal sequence
lethal aspect of attitudes- formation of attitude takes place w no cognitive process

27
Q

persuasion

A

attitude change
advertisers consider:
- source of info
- nature of message
- target audience

28
Q

elaboration likelihood model

A

likelihood message will cue interest of listener to exten they actually process (think) about what your presenting

29
Q

central route processing

A

message addresses actual benefit of product/service
ie: uber cheaper than taxi

30
Q

peripheral route processing

A

use material other than primary info to catch favorable attention of audience
ie: humor, good looking presenters

31
Q

Cognitive Dissonance

A

when attitudes and behavior clash

32
Q

leon festinger

A

Stanford prof
cognitive dissonance: contrast between one’s belief’s and one’s behaviors. Richard LaPiere was at Stanford when Festinger was there. It is probable that Festinger’s interest in Cognitive Dissonance was triggered by LaPiere’s research on attitude-behavior consistency (everyone experiences)
- when does dissonance prompt change/when does it not (gun example)

33
Q

four responses to dissonance

A
  • Change behavior to be consistent with attitude
  • Change attitude so it is not in conflict
  • Form cognitions to justify their behavior
  • Do nothing, there are large individual differences on the amount of dissonance that can be tolerated.
34
Q

inpression formation

A

form impressions about others due to implicit or learned predispositions

35
Q

social categories

A

we place different people in different categories based on available information: the athlete, the musician, the professor, the student, and thousands more.

36
Q

implicit personality theory

A

set of assumptions about how different types of people, personalities traits, and actions are related to each other

37
Q

attribution theory

A

reasons (attributions) that people use to explain behavior or circumstances
example: fail test, how you reason to why impacts future behavior

38
Q

Harold Kelley

A

attribution theory
UCLA prof

39
Q

divide in attribution theory

A

situational causes: external
dispositional causes: internal

40
Q

fundamental attribution error

A

tendency to overemphasize the internal causes of behavior and underestimate the situational causes
ie: lazy worker

41
Q

actor-observer bias

A

tendency to attribute my behavior to situational causes and someone else’s behavior to dispositional causes

42
Q

prejudice

A

same as attitude, subset of it
* Affect (emotion)
* Behavior
* Cognitions

prejudice is always negative and directed toward a category of people based on:
* Ethnicity
* Religion
* Sexual orientation
* Socio-economic status
* Physical characteristics

same origins
* Direct contact
* Direct instruction
* Interaction with others
* Principles of reinforcement, association, modeling

lethal aspect of prejudice ovvurs with no cognitive process

prototaxic thinking: relating to or being thinking that is lacking in self-awareness and in perception of temporal sequence

43
Q

realistic group conflict

A

if you get the job, i dont

44
Q

social comparison

A

im doing pretty ok, but im not doing as good as —-

45
Q

stereotype vulnerability

A

if my group is viewed negatively, I become hypersensitive to the possibility that I might be viewed negatively as well

46
Q

self fulfilling prophecy

A

told repeatedly that some day he would end up in jail, and he did

47
Q

factors that reduce prejudice

A
  • inter-group contact
  • equal status withing those groups
  • acquaintanceship potential
  • legislative support
48
Q

interpersonal attraction

A

physical attractiveness
proximity
similar attract- birds of a feather flock together
reciprocity- giving back to those that gave to you

49
Q

triarchic theory of love

A

robert sternberg- cornell univ
3 points- together makes consummate love
- passion (infatuation)
- intimacy (liking)
- commitment (empty love)

  • p+i: romantic love
  • i+c: companionate
  • c+p: fatuous love
50
Q

aggression

A

social learning perspectives on aggression
- reinforecment
- association
- modeling

51
Q

Philip Zimbardo

A

stanford prison experiment
prisoners vs guards
* The purpose was to see the dynamic of interaction between prisoners and guards
* The severity of abuse by the guards on the prisoners was so extreme that the experiment had to be shut down after 6 days.

The impact of media violence, violent movies, violent video games on actual behavior.

The dynamic tends to be one more of correlation rather than causation, although the “vicious cycle” is often observed

52
Q

prosocial behavior

A

Kitty Genovese murder (1964). Stabbed 31 times and killed while 38 watched and did nothing

Motivated research by John Darley and Bibb Latane. In 1970 they published their findings on bystander intervention.

53
Q

The 5 Decision points of helping:

A
  1. Notice that there is a problem
  2. Interpreting the situation as an emergency
  3. Taking responsibility
  4. Planning a course of action
  5. Taking action
54
Q

Diffusion of responsibility

A

When many are there, we tend to assume that someone else will handle the situation (they are stronger, more knowledgeable, have a vested interest, etc)

55
Q

The VA hospital example

A

When I was a grad student at UCLA, I was riding my bike through the VA hospital grounds. I saw a man with a walker fall. I stopped and helped him get up and made sure he was OK. If there had been others with him, I wouldn’t have stopped

PY (13 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions