Behavior Therapy Flashcards
Operant conditioning
assumes behavior is controlled by the environment
reinforcement and punishment
reinforcement
meant to increase the likelihood of behavior
punishment
meant to decrease the likelihood of behavior
what theory does operant conditioning embody?
S-R theory (stimulus in environment causes a response from the organism)
classical conditioning
a neutral stimulus comes to elicit a response through repeated pairing with another stimulus
ex. Pavlov’s dog, pairing bell (neutral) with food (conditioned) for salivation (response)
Bell and Pad treatment for bed-wetting
wake up when wet bed, meant to teach children to be woken up when they feel the need to pee
theory of personality for BT
behavior is explained in terms of variables in the environment
how does the theory of personality of BT differ from other theories?
behaviorist’s aren’t worried with what’s happening in the brain but what is happening in the environment
3 things involved with theory of personality in BT
learning
situational cues
- what is happening immediately in front of you, not past but present!
temperament
- biologically predisposition to certain modes of responding
- cannot change this! but can change how temperament is expressed
positive reinforcement
giving something to cause behavior to increase
negative reinforcement
taking something away to make behavior more likely
common examples of this is procrastination
- by not completing your work, you are taking away your fear and anxiety associated with it which makes you more likely to repeat this behavior
positive punishment
giving something (aversive usually) to decrease likelihood of behavior
negative punishment
take away (usually something that is wanted) to decrease likelihood of behavior
ex. take away a toy when a child misbehaves
ex. speeding ticket: taking away money (to pay ticket) to decrease the likelihood of you speeding again
operant conditioning: discrimination learning
behavior learned in context/environment that doesn’t generalize to another one
ex. well sleep trained in home environment, but not well trained in another environment
operant conditioning: generalization
when behavior occurs beyond context/environment it was acquired (good for adaptive behaviors but bad for maladaptive ones)
ex. Little Albert was conditioned for a white, fluffy rabbit but generalized this fear for anything white and fluffy
vicarious learning/observational learning (other types of operant conditioning)
occurs when we witness behavior and reinforce/punish in someone else
ex. peer gets in trouble for talking when not supposed, makes you not talk
Rule-governed behavior/instructional learning (other types of operant conditioning)
learn about environment contingencies without observing experience
ex. You probably haven’t seen someone get hit by a car, rather been told to avoid/learn to avoid it/look both ways before crossing street
how can operant conditioning be a source of distress?
maladaptive learned behaviors
adaptive learned behaviors do not generalize
maladaptive learned behaviors
procrastination
- negative reinforcement, learned
tantrums
- response to these/to stop will be done through reinforcement (ex. tantrum in target = toy), will increase behavior/be reinforced
classical conditioning as a source of distress
conditioning can give rise to maladapting behaviors
develop maladaptive habits
maintain maladaptive behaviors through cues in the environment
- ex. smokers smoke in car, causing car to be neutral stimulus that becomes a conditioned one to smoke
theory of psychotherapy for BT
change behavior by manipulating environment with adaptive learning process
goals of behavior therapy
change behavior!
correct maladaptive learning experiences and introduce adaptive learning
therapeutic style for BT
directive and transparent
- step-by-step instructions accompanied by clear rationale/so client knows why they are being asked to do certain things
therapeutic relationship
- not emphasized in traditional behaviorism but now known to bolster motivation