7.2 the measurement of, and tools for, pain and other symptoms Flashcards
What is the predominant difference between a symptom and a sign
a symptom is ‘a physical or mental feature which is regarded as indicating a condition of disease, particularly such a feature that is apparent to the patient’, inherently subjective.
signs, which are objective indicators of disease, and from pathological processes or diagnoses.
Symptom assessment tools seek to measure subjective symptom experiences. What is the best primary source of information for such tools? What are three situations where this is not possible?
patient self report
Not possible in pre-verbal patients and those with cognitive impairment from delirium or dementia
List three specific dimensions of a symptom that can be measured
Frequency
Severity
Distress
List three specific factors that symptom impact on can be measured. List two global constructs that can be impacted by symptoms and which can be measured
Other physical and psychological symptoms or diagnoses
Function
Family, social, financial, spiritual, and existential resources and concerns
Global constructs: Global symptom distress, Health-related quality of life
List four temporal dimensions of a symptom which can be measured
onset (abrupt or insidious)
duration
trajectory (worsening or improving)
daily pattern (continuous or intermittent)
Occurrence of discrete episodes of worsening symptoms
The impact of a symptom on QOL is most strongly associated with what dimension of a symptom? What is a common tool for measuring this dimension?
the impact of symptoms on QOL was maximized by concurrent measurement of other factors, including ‘symptom distress’ and either frequency or intensity. Of the
three dimensions assessed, distress was the most informative.
The Distress Thermometer
List four factors that modulate a pathophysiological process and influence the experience of symptoms
physical strengths
coping and adaption
family, social, financial supports
spiritual and existential resources
List three factors that influence the perception of symptoms (fig 7.2.1)
physical symptoms
psychological symptoms
disturbances in function
What two forces interact with one another to cause suffering and impaired QOL in PC (figure 7.2.1)
pathophysiological processes and perceptions?
Outcomes in PC are improved when routine use of symptom assessment tools is augmented by what two things
clinical pathway implementation and access to expert consultation
The routine use of symptom assessment tools improves what two primary outcomes? Less robust data exists for what two secondary outcomes
- patient-centred care in cancer settings, particularly in relation to patient-provider communication and patient satisfaction
- relation to the monitoring of treatment response and the detection of unrecognized problems.
-evidence is weak or non-existent in relation to the impact on changes to patient management and improved health outcomes; changes to patient health behaviour or the effectiveness of quality improvement of organizations; or the transparency, accountability, public reporting activities, and performance of the health-care system
A researcher is conducting an observational study and wants detailed information about symptoms that patients experience. What type of tool would be best
Simple, face-valid checklists may be used to determine the incidence
or prevalence of multiple physical and psychological symptoms
A researcher is conducting an observational study and wants to determine the prevalence of dyspnea after an intervention. What type of tool would be best
instrument for the measure of a particular symptoms - dyspnea scale
A researcher wants to understand the patient experience of nausea and also wants to know the impact of nausea on QOL. The researcher decides to use a QOL measure to collect all the data. Are there any issues with this? Why or why not?
QOL instruments were not developed as symptom assessment instruments. Neither the prevalence rates nor the characteristics and dimensions of the diverse array of physical and psychological symptoms experienced by patients may be captured adequately by these instruments.
An intervention is done and shows a reduction in pain severity of 1.2 in Group A and 1.9 in group B. The p value for the difference in pain is <0.01. Are there any issues with this? Why or why not?
- Statistical significance may or may not indicate clinical relevance
- Moreover, this difference reflects average scores and may hide the fact that some patients had very large changes after a treatment, whereas some did not change at all.
-Information about the responsiveness of a questionnaire to clinical changes and the minimal important difference (MID) in scores that depicts a clinically important change are very helpful in determining whether the differences observed during a study actually reflect a clinically meaningful event