18.1 (2.3) Predicting survival in patients with advanced disease Flashcards
List three components of the clinical act of prognostication
formulating a prognosis
communication prognosis
using prognosis when making clinical decisions
List 3 ways to formulate a prognosis
- Clinician-based - involves the use of subjective judgement, clinical experience, guidelines and research knowledge of clinician
- Model-based - depends on statistical data and models (e.g. nomograms, prognosis scores, algorithms)
- Mixed clinician- and model-based approach - uses both (e.g. clinician use BODE for COPD + clinical factors)
List 3 characteristics of a well designed study to evaluate the association between prognosis and survival
◆ A well-defined study population*
◆ Sample size is adequate for statistical power*
◆ Complete follow-up of all patients*
◆ Inception cohort design
◆ Prognostic factors selected are appropriate and clearly defined
◆ Clearly defined end point
◆ Data analysis is appropriate to test associations between the study factors and survival
◆ A measure of agreement between the predicted and actual survival
◆ The definition of accuracy is explicit and appropriate
◆ The prediction tested mirrors clinical language or practice
(i.e. not hazard ratios).
List two ways of stating a prognosis.
temporal prediction - time to event expressed as a continuous variable (e.g. 2-3 weeks)
probabilistic prediction - the % chance of an event happening in particular time (e.g. mortality in 6 months is 70%)
How effective is the “surprise question”?
Which population is it worse in?
Poor to moderately accurate tool for mortality prediction (performing worse in non-cancer patients)
List 5 factors that are considered in prognostication tools
*Performance status - PPS, KPS, ECOG
*Presence of certain key symptoms - SOB, anorexia, delirium
*Mood - depression is correlated to higher mortality
QOL and self rated health
*Comorbidities - eg presence of cancer
*Biomarkers - e.g. BNP in CHF, Na/K/GFR in kidney failure, bili in MELD, CRP and albumin
Genetics
What 3 key symptoms are prognostically significant?
dyspnea
anorexia/cachexia
Delirium
Identify two prognosis models that can be used in patients with advanced cancer
Palliative prognostic index (PPI) - use PPS, oral intake, SOB, delirium, edena
Palliative prognostic score (PaP) - use KPS, anorexia, dyspnea, WBC, lymphocyte, clinician proediction of survival
Prognosis in Palliative Care Study (PiPS) - use HR, health status, mental test score, PPS, anorexia, site of mets, liver mets, BWK
Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (m-GPS) - use CPR and albumin
List 5 categories on the palliative performance scale
ambulation
activity level/evidence of disease (IADL)
self care (ADL)
intake
LOC
Name 2 prognostication tools for CHF
NYHA classification category (NYHA class IV has 1 year mortality of 30-40%)
Seattle Heart Failure Model
Name 2 prognostication tools for COPD - what factors do they look at?
BODE = BMI, obstruction (FEV1), dyspnea (MRC dyspnea scale), exercise capacity (6 min walk distance)
HADO = health (self assessment), activity (self assessment), dyspnea, obstuction (FEV1)
Name 2 prognostication tools for ESLD - what outcomes are they looking at?
Child Pugh - lab (alb, bili, PTT) + symptom (ascites, encephalopahty) = 1 and 2 year outcomes
MELD (model of end stage liver disease) - lab (bili, creatinine, INR) = 3 months outcome
Name 2 prognostication tools for dementia - which is more accurate?
Function assessment staging tool (FAST) - describes stages of dementia based on function
Advanced dementia prognostic tool (ADEPT) - age, sex, weight loss, function, symptoms and continence (more accurate than FAST)
What are four techniques for maintaining hope when providing poor prognosis
Retaining professional honesty
Avoiding being blunt or giving more detailed information than desired by the patient
Pacing of information
Exploring and facilitating realistic goals
Respecting patients’ need to follow alternative paths/ treatments
List 4 important methods for communicating a prognosis
first clarify the person’s understanding of their medical situation and the information they desire. (K of SPIKE)
tailor information to the individual needs of patients and their families. (I of SPIKE)
communication occurs within the context of a caring, trusting relationship
consistency of information within the multiprofessional team