22.1 Research in Palliative Care Flashcards

1
Q

List 2 current gaps in palliative care research

A
  1. Very few RCTs
  2. Few studies include patients with short survival
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

List 2 benefits demonstrated by early involvement of palliative care

A
  1. Cost effective and leads to better patient and caregiver outcomes
  2. Early involvement during anticancer treatment in patients with advanced disease has beneficial effects on symptoms, psychological distress, and survival
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

List 4 barriers to palliative care research

A
  1. Lack of funding
  2. Due to #1, insufficient scope and size of studies to provide conclusive results
  3. Difficulty attracting experienced researchers
  4. Low scientific value
  5. Insufficient institutional support
  6. Uncertain career structures
  7. Pall care misconstrued as end of life only
  8. Pall care not perceived as integral part of health care/research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List 4 ways to support future developments in palliative care research

A
  1. Challenge established, well-sized research groups to further develop pall care research
  2. Establish national and international funding programmes that provide predictable funding
  3. Increase the public awareness of the importance and impact of palliative care research
  4. Increase the attractiveness of palliative care research by offering part-time positions making it possible to combine research and clinical work.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Research governance includes which 5 domains?

A
  1. ethics (dignity, rights)
  2. science (research quality)
  3. information
  4. health and safety
  5. finance and intellectual property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

List 3 important issues to be aware of when it comes to informed consent by palliative care patients

A
  1. Patients may feel obliged, so avoid having MRP ask for consent.
  2. Most patients with advanced disease are eager/appreciate being asked to participate (HCPs assume otherwise)
  3. May be unethical not to ask - patient should be the one to decide ( or SDM, cognitive impairment does not always preclude)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define systematic reviews vs. meta-analyses

Why are these studies increasingly important

A

Systematic reviews involve gathering, appraising, and synthesizing all available evidence to answer a particular questions

Meta-analysis is a type of systematic review that combines results from multiple studies (preferably RCTs)

Importance:
- comprehensive
- scientific design reduces bias
- increased reliability
- powerful as aggregate large amounts of data

Aim to increase power, improve estimates of effect sizes, and resolve uncertainty when reports disagree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

List 3 population characteristics studied by descriptive epidemiology

What are the 3 major categories of descriptive epidemiology?

How are the findings of these studies helpful?

A
  1. prevalence
  2. incidence
  3. patterns of disease/health

Major categories are: individuals, time, and place

Helps determine health needs and access

Guides planning and delivery of healthcare services, adjusting for unwanted inequalities (in effectiveness, efficiency, and accessibility)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

List 3 quantitative epidemiological methods

A
  1. population-based surveys
  2. use of death certificate data to study place of death
  3. studies of routine administrative data at the population level (can link with disease-specific databases)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

List a major challenges in designing valid palliative care studies

A

Very heterogenous patient population

(no clear defining classification)

internal validity: degree of confidence that causal relationship being tested is trustworthy/not influenced by other facors

external validity: degree to which results of study can be applied to other groups/situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

You are planning a clinical trial. You base your question on a clinical observation from your day to day practice.

Outline the steps of setting up your research project.

If you decide to pursue an RCT, what might be advisable as a 1st step in planning?

A

Box 22.1.1:

  1. Describe the clinical problem or observations that prompted the idea for a study.
  2. Discuss relevance/validity of the observations in a multidisciplinary setting, with clinicians, nurses, researchers. Seek advice from a statistician early on.
  3. Perform comprehensive literature reviews to find out what is known about the topic.
  4. Formulate your hypotheses and research question(s) to define the aim of the study.
  5. Define the patient population.
  6. Decide on the appropriate study design.
  7. Decide on the outcomes to be measured.
  8. Consider if the research team actually has access to the desired patient population, and estimate the approximate number within a given timeline.
  9. Start writing the protocol.

(Advisable 1st step for RCT - a pilot study to test study design/anticipate challenges)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why are RCT’s difficult to design in the palliative care?

List 2 types of studies that could be pursued instead?

A
  1. patient’s high symptom burden and shorter life expectancy = higher atrrition rates

2.
qualitative or mixed methods studies

or cluster randomized designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly