4.1.2 MULTI-STORE MODEL OF MEMORY Flashcards
- who devised the multi-store model of memory?
- when?
- why?
- Atkinson and Shriffin
- 1968
- to explain how the sensory memory, short-term memory and long-term memory link together, processing information
what is the multi-store model of memory?
- a cognitive model of memory written in the same way information processing models in computers are designed
- involves the forward flow of information
sensory input -> sensory memory -> short-term memory -> long-term memory -> output
eg) output could be a person recalling the info to use
how does the information pass through the multi-store model of memory?
incorporates how information is passed across the types of memory
- info from SM to STM is via attention
- info then passes from SM to LTM via rehearsal
- info can be passed back from LTM to STM via retrieval
eg) learning a phone number you may have to chunk it into smaller components and use your LTM to make sure the chunks have meaning
- LTM is required to help guide STM to do this
- hence info passing back from LTM to STM to give the numbers/chunks meaning
what does the MSM look like?
what evidence is there for the Primary/Recency effect? (AO3)
GLANZER AND CUNITZ (1966)
- researched this effect
- if you give ppts a list of words to learn and allow free recall you’ll find that the first few words and last few words on the list are most commonly recalled
- this is because the first few words are rehearsed and so enter the LTM
- last few words are still in your STM as the duration is less than 28 seconds so they’ll still be available
- this indicates two separate stores
what evidence is there that there are two separate stores?
SQUIRE ET AL (1992)
- found that when you conducted a brain scan on a ppt then STM and LTM are located in different parts of the brain
- shows that they must be two separate stores if they’re in two distinct parts of the brain
- patients with severe amnesia are also evident as they may have lost all LTM but retain STM
- also indicates that they’re separate stores as one can exist without the other
what was the case study of K.F?
SHALLICE AND WARRINGTON (1970)
- reported the case of a man named KF who’s been in a motorcycle accident
- had severe damage to his STM but his LTM remained intact
- his STM had the ability for verbal information
- could process visual information
- suggests his phonological loop has been damaged, leaving the VSS intact
what are the pros of the MSM (AO3)
PROS
- has been very influential, over 50 years later it’s still being used
- lots of evidence for its existence from research, brain scans and case studies of amnesia
- provides a good understanding of the structure and processes of memory, meaning we can expand on this model
- K.F supports the existence of a seperate visual and acoustic store in the STM which is what the model suggests
-> therefore this gives higher model validity
- can explain the primary recency effects
- can pinpoint where H.M is suffering from
what are the cons of the MSM? (AO3)
CONS
- unitary STM is a limitation of the MSM because research shows that at the very least there must be one short-term store to process visual info and another to process auditory info
- model is seen as oversimplified in how it approaches STM
- model doesn’t account for the different types of LTM
- rehearsal is problematic as there are different types, such as elaborating and maintenance
- model ignores factors like motivation and ability to learn