4.1.2 INTERFERENCE Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is forgetting?

A
  • the failure to retrieve memories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is interference?

A
  • an explanation for forgetting from LTM
  • two sets of similar information in the LTM become confused with or disrupted by other information during encoding
  • this leads to inaccurate recall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is retroactive interference?

A
  • retro = backward
  • where new learning prevents recall of previously learned information
  • later learning interferes with earlier learning
  • new memories disrupt old memories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is proactive interference?

A
  • pro = forward
  • where old learning prevents recall f more recent information
  • when what we already know interferes with what we’re currently learning
  • where old memories disrupt new memories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

when are proactive and retroactive interference thought to be more likely to occur?

A
  • more likely to occur when the memories are similar
  • eg) confusing old and new telephone numbers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was the aim of Schmidt et al’s study in 2000?

A
  • to access influence of retroactive interference upon memory of street names learning during childhood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the procedure Schmidt et al used?

A
  • 700 ppts were randomly selected from a database of 1700 students at a Dutch school
  • they were all sent a questionnaire
  • 211 responded (age 11-79)
  • they were given a map of the area
  • the 48 street names replaced with numbers
  • asked to remember as many as possible
  • relevant details were collected
  • including: how many times the ppt had moved house, where they
    lived etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how was retroactive interference accessed?

A
  • by the number of times indicates had moved to other neighbours or cities
  • thus learning new street names
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what were the findings of this study?

A
  • positive association between number of times ppts had moved house and the number of street names forgotten
  • retroactive interference is potentially causing forgetting
  • supports interference theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

evaluate a strength of this study?

A
  • ecological validity is quite high as it has real life applications
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

evaluate weaknesses of this study

A
  • extraneous variables are present
    eg) - IQ
    - age
    - how long they attended the school
    - questionnaire completed at home, they could’ve cheated
    - form of travel to the school
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was the procedure of Baddeley and Hitch study in 1977?

A
  • asked rugby players to remember as many teams as possible they’d played
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how was interference tested?

A
  • by accessing how recall was affected by number of games played
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the conclusion of forgetting and interference?

A
  • forgetting was due to the number of games played rather than the amount of time passed
  • supports interference as the more games that were played, the more interference was experienced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was the procedure of the McGeoch and Mcdonald study in 1931?

A
  • studied retroactive interference
  • changed the amount of similarity between two sets of materials
  • ppts learnt a list of 10 words until they could remember them with 100% accuracy
  • learnt a new list
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

there were 6 groups of ppts who learnt different types of lists
what were these lists?

A
  • group 1 -> synonyms - words with same meanings as the original
  • group 2 -> antonyms - words with opposite meanings to the
    original
  • group 3 -> words unrelated to the original ones
  • group 4 -> consonant syllables
  • group 5 -> three-digit numbers
  • group 6 -> no new list - these participants just rested
17
Q

what were the findings of this study?

A
  • when ppt recalled the original list of words
  • their performance depended on the nature of the second list
  • most similar material (synonyms) produced the worst recall
  • this shows that interference is the strongest when memories are similar
18
Q

what were the strengths of this study?

A
  • studies show that both types of interference are very likely to be common ways we forget information from LTM
    -> lab experiments control the effects of irrelevant influences

↳ therefore give us confidence that interference is a valid
explanation for at least some forgetting

19
Q

proactive and retroactive interference are reliable and robust effects

there are several problems with interference theory an as explanation of forgetting

what are these?

A
  • interference theory tells us little about the cognitive processes involved in forgetting
  • majority of research into the role of interference in forgetting has been carried out in laboratory settings using lists of words
    -> a situation which is likely to occur infrequently in everyday life
    -> low ecological validity
    -> may not be possible to generalise from the findings
  • how much forgetting can be attributed to interference remains unclear