2.1 RESEARCH METHODS: CHOOSING Flashcards
Quantitative data:
-Numerical facts and statistics
-Questionnaires, structured interviews
-Positivists approach
Qualitative data:
-Non-numerical (words) e.g. diaries, documents, transcripts
-looking at the feelings and experiences of people
-Interpretivist approach
what is primary data?
-the researcher collects information themselves
-e.g. surveys, questionaries, focus groups, participant observations
what is secondary data?
-data already collected beforehand (already exists) that is used by sociologists, easy to compare and analyse- reliable
-e.g. statistics
field experiments:
-primary
-quantitative
paintings:
-secondary
-qualitative
exam league tables:
-secondary
-quantitative
school reports:
-secondary
-qualitative
divorce statistics:
-secondary
-quantitative
factors influencing choice of methods- practical issues:
-time and money
-requirements of funding bodies
-personal skills & characteristics
-subject matter
-research opportunities
time & money (practical issue)
-the funding necessary to conduct the research
-decide what methods take longer e.g. participant observations
-questionaries are cheap and quick
requirements of funding bodies (practical issue)
-limited by those funding the research
-need different types of data e.g. Gov= statistical data
personal skills & characteristics (practical issue)
-each researcher is different so each need: good memory, patience
be able to get good observations
-e.g. cover researcher has to be able to blend in
subject matter (practical issue)
-requires respect of different opinions, feelings ; can affect results depending on how sensitive/ difficult the study is
research opportunities (practical issue)
-some cases research opportunities may occur unexpectedly
-limited to when you can conduct the research
factors influencing choice of methods- ethical issues
-informed consent
-confidentiality & privacy
-harm to research participants
-vulnerable groups
-covert research
informed consent (ethical issue)
-participants should be able to refuse being researched and have a right to know what the research is about in detail
(have an open and honest researcher)