11. Observations AO3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

A weakness of observational techniques

A

Observer bias risk - interpretation of situation may be affected by expectations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A strength of naturalistic experiments

A

High external validity - natural contexts - behaviour more likely to be spontaneous - generalisable to everyday

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A weakness of naturalistic experiments

A

Low control - uncontrolled EV - more difficult to detect patterns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A strength of controlled experiments

A

Can be replicated - more easily represented - standardised procedures - findings can be checked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A weakness of controlled experiments

A

Low external validity - behaviour may be result of setting - may not apply to everyday

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A strength of covert experiments

A

Reduced demand characteristics- participants unaware of being studied - act normally - increases validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A weakness of covert experiments

A

Ethically questionable - may not want behaviour recording - rights to privacy affected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A strength of overt experiments

A

More ethically acceptable - give consent - right to withdraw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A weakness of overt experiments

A

Demand characteristics - knowledge of being studied - influences behaviour - reduced validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A strength of researcher becoming participant

A

Greater insight - researcher experiences what participants do - enhances validity of findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A weakness of researcher becoming participants

A

Loss of objectivity - researcher may identify too strongly with participants - threatens objectivity and validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A strength of researcher remaining a non-participants

A

More objective - researcher maintains objective distance - less change of bias - may increase validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A weakness of researcher remaining a non-participants

A

Loss of insight - researcher may be too far removed - may reduce validity of findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A weakness of behavioural categories

A

Difficult to make clear & unambiguous - categories shouldn’t overlap - should be set clear categories - e.g. Smiling would be a poor category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A strength of time sampling

A

Reduced number of observations - not recording everything seen - data recorded at intervals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A weakness of time sampling

A

May be unrepresentative - researcher may miss important details - outside of time scales - doesn’t reflect whole behaviour

17
Q

A strength of event sampling

A

May record infrequent behaviour - researcher will pick up behaviours that don’t occur at regular intervals - behaviours could easily be missed

18
Q

A weakness of event sampling

A

Oversimplifies complex behaviour - if event is too complex important details may not be recorded - affects validity