Week 10 - Conflict Flashcards

1
Q

What is interpersonal conflict?

A

Can arise when one individuals motives, beliefs, goals, opinions or behaviour interfere w/ those of ANOTHER

We often make SACRIFICES so conflict doesn’t end in anger/hostility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

All conflicts are not “______”

A

Overt

Sometimes we are completely unaware we are causing distress to our partners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are 2 reasons why conflict is inescapable in a romantic partnership?

A
  1. Moods/preferences of 2 individuals will DIFFER (occasionally at least)
  2. We often experience opposing motivations (dialectics)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are some dialectics?

These 4 dialectics account for more than “____%” of recent arguments that are reported by married couples

A

Autonomy VS connection
(Wanna be free to do what you want, but you also seek connection- can lead to dependency)

Openness VS closeness
(Self-disclosure, but people still want privacy)

Stability VS change
(Motivated to keep relationship stable, but also crave novelty/excitment)

Integration VS separation from social network
(Want to stay home and cuddle w/ partner, or go out with friends)

**CONFLICT BOUND TO HAPPEN IF PARTNERS HAVE DIALECTICS AT DIFF TIMES AND DIFF RATES

30%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How often do romantic partners typically engage in conflict?

Dating couples report “__.__” conflicts/week (when they keep diary or interactions)

Married couples report “__” differences of opinion every “__” weeks & tend to experience “__-__” unpleasant disagreements every month

A

Frequently

BUT

Actual incident depends on…

  1. The specific POPULATION ASSESSED
  2. The way that CONFLICT is both DEFINED and ASSESSED
    ———————————————————————————-
    2.3

7; 2; 1-2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In one study it found that partners didn’t talk about “____%” conflicts or irritations they had

A

40%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are 7 factors that are associated w/ the frequency of conflict we experience?

A
  1. Personality (ppl who score high on neuroticism = more unstable/more disagreements)
  2. Attachment style (secure attachment style = tend to manage conflict better/have less conflict)
  3. Stage of life (young adults tend to experience more conflict- mid 20’s)
  4. Similarity (less similar = more conflict)
  5. Stress (more combined stress a couple has = more conflict)
  6. Sleep (sleep tends to suffer after conflict = more irritable)
  7. Alcohol (alcohol increased hostility & blaming)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are some instigating events?

A

(Most significant to least significant)
***Children

Chores

Communication

Leisure

Work

***Money

Habits

Relatives

Commitment

Intimacy

Friends

Personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In order to make sense of the variety of conflicts couples experience…

Peterson classified instigating events in what 4 categories?

A
  1. Criticism (verbal and nonverbal communicate dissatisfaction)
  2. Illegitimate demands (go way above expectations someone holds for a partner)
  3. Rebuffs (one person appeals to the other for a desired response, the other partner doesn’t appeal)
  4. Cumulative annoyances (fairly trivial events become irritating- happens lots)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the evolutionary perspective on conflict?

A

In heterosexual partnerships = some conflict is EXPECTED given the differences in partners REPRODUCTIVE interests

*Women tend to become upset by males who want SEX SOONER and more FREQUENTLY

*Men tend to become upset by women who DELAY SEX for a long time and IGNORE their SEXUAL ADVANCES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is an attribution seen in conflict?

A

Actor/observer effects:
- partners have slightly different explanations for their OWN actions than anyone else does

Self-serving biases:
- result in judging OWN ACTIONS more favourably than others

= partners attributions DIFFERENT and this can create conflict
(Misunderstandings/attributional conflict- which conflict is more right)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are benevolent attributions?

A

If you perceive your partners misbehaviour to be…

  1. Unintentional, external & stable causes = seem blameless
  2. Intentional, internal & unstable = anger response

= make it EASY for conflicts to be resolved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is involved in engagement & escalation?

A

Once an instigating event happens…

Partners must decide whether:
1. They will ADDRESS the issue
2. Let it GO

*This is the first choice in Petersons model of conflict
——————————————————————————
When partners say mean things to one another…

Can come in 2 forms:
1. DIRECT tactics (aqqusations that criticize, hostile demands)
2. INDIRECT tactics (attempts to change topic, whineing)

*increase heart rate/cholesteral = decrease immune
*married couples who fight this way, more likely to DIVORCE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the negative effect reciprocity?

A

Because one partner is being TESTY, the other partner follows suit and SNAPS BACK

Interaction becomes INCREASINGLY more noxious & angry

Pattern is found in DISSATISFIED COUPLES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the demand/withdraw pattern?

Women tend to be the “_________” and men tend to be the “__________” (more often bring up relationship issues)

A

Pattern occurs when one partner engages in DEMANDING FORMS OF BEHAVIOUR such as complaints, criticisms and pressure for changes
(Becomes more frustrated)

The other engages with WITHDRAWING FORMS OF BEHAVIOUR such as avoiding discussion and walking away
(Makes withdrawer more resistant)
——————————————————————————
Demanders; withdrawers

Gender norms?

Autonomy?

Power? Among males and females

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is negotiation and accommodation?

What is the best-case scenario?

A

Partners discuss their perspectives and they work towards a solution TOGETHER

Best-case scenario:
- each partner is RESPONSIVE to the other
- feels VALIDATED by how their partners RESPONDS

*direct (willingness by accepting responsibility/showing support- paraphrasing/affection)

*indirect tactics (being friendly, non-sarcastic- lighten moods)

= exist to encourage (+) negotiation

17
Q

What are 4 ways to reduce intensity of a conflict?

A
  1. Taking a FUTURE OREINTATION
  2. Be OPTIMISTIC
  3. Value your partners OUTCOMES & YOUR OWN
  4. TAKE A BREAK from discussion (if irritation/annoyance is escalating)
18
Q

What are the 4 typology of responses to dissatisfaction in relationships?

A
  1. Exit (destructive & active)
  2. Neglect (destructive & passive)

***3. Voice (constructive & active) = tends to be most beneficial

  1. Loyalty (constructive & passive)
19
Q

What are the 4 types of couples (in dealing w/ conflict)?

What does Gottman say about these?

A

***1. Volatile:
- have FREQUENT & PASSIONATE arguments
- display high (-) affect, but they balance this temper w/ FONDNESS for each other
- rare to have both couples these

***2. Validators:
- fight POLITELY, tend to be more CALM and behave like COLLABERATORS
- discussions can be heated but they often VALIDATE each others feelings (understanding/empathy)
- pretty good relationship when paired w avoiders & volatile
- most secure style

***3. Avoiders:
- RARELY argue, avoid confrontation and if they do end up discussing conflicts, they do do MILDY & CAREFULLY
- try to fix issues on their OWN/wait them out

*** Gottman argues that ^ these 3 can survive (high reward to cost ratio)

  1. Hostiles:
    - too much CRITICISM, CONTEMPT, DEFENSIVENESS, WITHDRAWAL & the longer they go on… more OPPRESSIVE they tend to become
    - couples are MEANER to one another than others
20
Q

What are the 5 ways Peterson identified conflicts can end?

A
  1. Separation (one or both partners withdrawal, time can ALSO be good)
  2. Domination (one partner gets their way, the other surrenders)
  3. Compromise (both partners reduce roles = agree to disagree)
  4. Integrative agreements (satisfy BOTH partners goals)
  5. Structural improvement (big shifts on how they engage in relationships, not the most common)
21
Q

Can fighting be good for a relationship?

What does Gottman think?

A

More IRRITANTS that partners DONT communicate = the LESS SATISFIED they tend to be w/ their relationships

“Conflict in couples is common, normal and necessary” - Gottman

22
Q

Some couples can learn to fight “__________”

What does this mean?

A

Constructively

A study found that followed most couples throughout throughout transition to parenthood found that…

Most maintained SAME style of conflict over 2 yr duration

50% fought CONSTUCTIVELY

25% fought POORLY

23
Q

Successful conflict management requires “______-______”!!!!!

A

SELF-CONTROL

Work at staying optimistic, avoiding blame, controlling anger = much more equipped to be creative, tolerant & flexible = agreements are more LIKELY to be reached

Avoiding… (when partner raises complaint/concern)

  1. Resist urge to use withdrawal
  2. Resist urge to use contempt
  3. Not to become negative
24
Q

What is the speaker listener technique?

A

Provides STRUCTURE for calm & clear communication about difficult issues

Often used by marriage therapists to help couples mange conflict

Designed to STOP cycle of MISPERCEPTION that often happens when partners RESPOND TOO FAST to the other w/out checking their understanding

3 steps:

  1. Someone the the floor (the speaker) & uses “I” statements 2.Listener has to listen and paraphrase the speakers message
  2. When the speaker feels like their message has been understand they SWITCH roles