Urban Drainage Case Study Flashcards
Where was it
Camborne Cambridge
What were the aims of the scheme
Showcase practical and innovative sustainable water management techniques within new residential developments
Demonstrate the SuDS are a viable and attractive alternative to more traditional forms of drainage and to deliver practical solutions for new housing areas
Who where the scheme stakeholders
European funded programme- FLOWS
Local residents
Cambridgeshire County Lound
Developers
What are the SUD used here
Water butts
Permeable paving
Green roof
Swales
Detention basins
Retention ponds
What does the concepts of management trains mean in context
Using simple natural and visible drainage components in series to improve the water quality
Also controls quantity of run off by reducing flow rates and volumes
Water management- considered from where it leaves sight. Mimics natural pattern of drainage prior to developments
Roof water that isn’t collected in water butts flows to grass Swales or under drained Swales where pollutants are filtered
Rain falling on paths- permeable pavement
Management train- water travels downstream thru Swales, detention basics and wetlands before reaches final retention
To what extent has the scheme been successful
Large extent
Environmental success
Concerns that water might be hazardous were unfounded
Improvement in enviro- biodiversity, ecology and QOL- better at Lamb Drove then typical residential area
Improved quality of water leaving sight then pipes
Economic success
Cost effective- construction and maintenance- 10% less then conventional pipe drainage systems
Social success
Enviro - better QOL
Sculptures Swales and detention basins resulted in attractiveness and social idler
Water not hazardous