Topic 4- Economy And Society- 1929-41 Flashcards
Was nep working- yes peasants
Grainsupply increase
Fear of famine fall
Was nep working by 1927 no peassnts
Graini production still hold country hostage
Wooden ploughs- backwards- 5 mill still in use by 1927 failure to modernise
Land holdings smaller than before 1911- large estates suplying cities had disappeared
Relationship between peasants and city deterioriated since civil war0 see worse tambov 118 feb
Peasants not producting q needed for industrial exapnsion- 1913 exported 12 mill tonees, best year nep never morethan 3 mill tonnes
Debastating inpact foriegn trade 1926-27 exports 33% 1913
Poor harvest 1927 starvating in cities
Had to sell grain cheaply to gov- have to sell more to make up costs- but no consumer goods so litle point
Nep working for workers yes
Better off than before rev- wages had 2.6x 1920-26
8hr working fay
Workers had a role in state within factories with local tu member running factories alongside specialist directions
Nep not working for workers by 1927
Real wage only just passed 1913 levels by 1928
High unemp throughout nep
Gap between workers and higehr society evident and complained about bitterly
High food prices increased scarcity
Paid less than specialits or officers
Women suffered forecd out of jobs when red army mobalised large no unemployed and unsupported on streets
Housing problem overcrowding - smolensk 1929 6-7 live in one room
Crime increased in cities
Kolkhoz
Most common form of collectivised farm
All land held in common and run by elected comm
50-100 households put together
All land, tools , livestock has to be pooled
Under direction of the comm, formed as single unit
Each household maintain a private plot of one acre
Mts
Machine tractor stations
2500 mts established to support collectivisation- hand out machinery
Peasants hand over 20% produce for this service
Ogpu in control so could decide who awarded
How was collectivisation carried out in ussr 1928-41
Emergency measures
Urals siberian method
Forced collectivisation
Dekulakisation
Peasant opp
Party retreats
Continued collectivisation
Famine 1932-34
Consolidation
Collectivisation- emergency measures j
Jan 1928 politburo voted unanimously for emergency measures to introduce urals siberian mechanism
Cohen pivotal event-
Rationing in city- scissor crisis
Disincentive
Urals siberian method
Summer 1928
Over 100,000 party workers, komsomol members and factory wokrers went out and dived into countryside to help peasants with harvest- revive smyka
Will use as opp to find kulaks hoards grain- 25% reward for finding
Prodcued more but not permant growth
Forced collectivisation
Jan 1929
Stalin call collectivisation of all grain producing areas by aug 1930
Almost 60% all farms cllectivised
If opposed branded kulak
Dekulakisation
Targets set for dekulakisation in eah area
Peasantry encouraged to denaounce kulaks in village
Over 1 mill kulaks farmers affected by this policu
Comm propaganda increased class hatred
Up to 10 mill people deported to siberia or labour camps by end of process
But v diff identify kulaks and imbedded in communit
Peasant opp to collectivisation
Attack on churches often accompnied by youngester league militant godless
Many peasants ate slaughtered or sold animals rather than handing over
Party retreats collectivisation
Stalin pravda- dizzy with sucess- workers too enthusastic and forced pace- mar 1930
Return of unjustly brandihsed kulaks
Critic for collectivisation
Return to collectivisation
Once grani collected after good harvest 1930 started agin
By 191 less 50% kolkhoz increased to 100 by 1939- peasabts keep small areas of land
Ny times durranty- collectivisation may now be said to have been established on a solid foundation with enormous rewards to russian contribution
Famine 1932-34
Poor weather and increased demand urban pop 28 to 40 mill 1930-32
Grain less left peasantry 60 to 40 mil tonne 1928-31
Estimated 4.5mill died holodomour
Consolidation collectivisation
1939 announced all farms collectivised
Formally legalised small plost 1/2 hectare or less per household
Internal passport and pontemkin vilalges to westerners
Impact collectivisation- poliical
Grain procurement increased crushing peasangs- holding hostage
Hit esp ukrain nationalists
Kulak eliminated but most skilled
Stalin personal power consolllidated by mid 1930s
Alienated right and left with great turn
Impact collectivisation -social
Aim destroy kulaks and spirit
League militent godless
Internal passports ogpu in mts and on trains- cities cant see starvation
West largely niave- pontemkin village
Many felt betrayed by comm policu
Devestated with high deaths 5mill
Impact collectivisation- econ
Increased grain production for export and cities
Not caused as dont increase grain procurement
Mts 2500 not enough
Quotas increase despitye social impact
Liquidation kulaks lose knoweldge an dexperience
Agricultural procuremet lukewarm until 1950s
Famine esp ukraine
Process rapid industrialistion
Law of spikelets
Seven eights law inytroduced hard punishment for those supsected stealing collective property
1932-40 180,000 convicted, 10 y imprisonment
5 y plans how organised
Centrally planned state deciding what and where produced
Set broad directives easily adapted
Target backed by law failed to meet target could be treated as a criminal offence
Peopele cpmissariats- gov dpt- 4 by 1934- food, light, heavy
Gosplan state planning com by 1921
Regional admin- local outputs recivee info targets
5y plans looked like
Declared year ahead schedule
Hige industrial cities constructed magnitogorsk urals
Huge projetcs gigantomania- dnieprostroi dam- increased soveit power output x5
Foriegn support 5y plans
Large no companies sent specialists engineers and skilled workers to enact new factories and exploit new resources- ford automodtive industry
Colonel hugh- heloed byuld dam
A kucksiger asbestos industry in remote place in urals called aspbestos
Aims first 5y plan
1928-32
Heavy indsurty- coal iron steel oil machinery
Boost electricity x6
Light industry chemicals
Sucess first 5y plns
Electricty x3
Coal and iron x2
Magnitogrosk huge project
New tractor works stalingrad
Setback 1st
Little consumer industry
Lacked skilled worjers
Lack of transport bottlenecks
Targets not met
Nomadic gypsy camp
Polciies used first
Gosplan
Vesenkha targets
After 1930-criminals more than 3y to lab camps
Wage diferenytaisl 1931
Shock brigade- efforts to build lots dams
Impacts class first 3 5y plans
Social class workers
Proletariat
Overall judgement 1st
Kick started the econ
But many weakness and setbacks
Especially lack transport and skileld owkrers
Second 5y plan aims
1933-37
Rail road water networks transport
Consumer goods to a degree
Consolidation
2nd sucess
Became virtually self sufficient in machinery making and metal works
Transport links increased
Chemical indsutry increase
Increased focus consumer goods- food processes, good workers
Moscow metro opened
Coal amd electricity x2
Second 5y plan setbacks
Waste over producing
Lack consumer goods indusrty
Oil production targets missed, even though reduced
Nd policies used
Great ppurges increased forced labour
Stakhanovites idealised owkrers- pravda coined term stakhanovite movement
Recordmania
Overall judgement second
More sucessful with self sufficient
Increased transport links longer term benefit
Start consumer goods
3rd 5y plan aims
1935-31
War readiness heavy industry armaments