Social Learning Theory of Gender Flashcards
Social Learning Theory applied to gender development - learned through social context
- Gender behaviour is learned from observation + reinforcement for imitating behaviour
- Draws attention to influence of environment such as peers, parents and culture (nurture) in developing gender
Direct reinforcement (differential)
- Children are more likely to be reinforced directly for behaviour that’s stereotypically gender appropriate
e.g. boys encouraged to be active, girls passive + gentle
- Differential - encouraged to show distinct gendered behaviour
Vicarious (indirect) reinforcement / punishment
If consequences of behaviour of another person (a child identifies with) are seen as favourable
=> behaviour is more likely to be imitated
If consequences are unfavourable, child is less likely to imitate behaviour
Identification
Where a child attaches themselves to/ want to associate with, a person they want to be
Person tend to:
- possess quality they can relate to + see as desirable
- are role models - in child’s immediate environmnent
- attractive, high status + same gender as child
Behaviour modelled + imitated
For example:
(1) mother models stereotypically feminine behaviour when home making
(2) girl then copies mother by setting the table or feeding her doll
Mediational processes
Attention - watching role model
Retention - remembering actions
Motivation - desire to be like role model
Motor reproduction - be capable to do it
(S) Supporting Evidence for Differential Reinforcement - Smith + Lloyd (1978)
- Observed adults w/ 4-6 month old babies with half dressed as boys or girls (regardless of their gender)
- Assumed to be a boy => encouraged to active + given a hammer rattle
- Assumed to be a girl => reinforced for passivity + given doll + praised for looks
Suggests => gender appropraite behaviour is stamped in at early age through differential reinforcement - supports SLT
COUNTER - differential reinforcement may not cease gender differences
Adults may respond to innate gender differences in their own children e.g encouraging boisterous boys to be active
Suggests => its likely SLT is only part of explaining children acquiring gender- related behaviours
(S) SLT can explain cultural changes
- There’s more androgyny in many societies today compared to the 50s
- Shift in social expectation => new forms of gender schema are unlikely to be punished/ may be reinforced
SHOWS - SLT (or cognitive - not bio=> no corresponding change with shift) can better explain gender behaviour
(L) SLT doesn’t explain developmental process
- SLT implies modelling can occur at any age onwards
BUT - illogical that 2yr olds learn the same as 9yr olds
conflicts w/ Kohlberg’s theory that children don’t become active in gender development until constancy
SHOWS - influence of age on learning gender concepts isn’t considered
Extra - Identification
- Freud, like SLT, thought it’s important in gender development + is key in internalising gender identity of same sex parent
- BUT in SLT - identification in gender role models occur beyond just parents
Suggests => same gender parent is important but just a key influence + not the sole one