Minority Influence Flashcards
Minority Influence
A form of social influence where the minority persuaded others to adopt their beliefs, attitudes or behaviours
- Leads to internalisation (public + private beliefs are changed)
- 1st studied by Moscovici (blue-green slides)
Consistency
Influence is most effective when the minority keep the same beliefs causing others to rethink their views
- synchronic: all saying the same thing
- diachronic: same thing over time
Commitment
Influence is more powerful when minority is dedicated to their view
E.g. risky extreme activities to show greater commitment - augmentation principle
Flexibility
Nemeth - too much consistency is off putting and seem rigid
Minority is more convincing if they accept reasonable counter arguments and adapt their view
The process of change
(1) hearing something new causes deeper thinking especially if source is consistent committed and flexible
(2) deeper processing => conversion to minority view + increasing numbers switch
(3) snowball effect - becomes majority view + change has occurred
(S) Research Support for Consistency
Moscovici’s blue/green slide study showed consistent minority view greater changing majority view than inconsistent
- meta analysis of ~100 similar studies found consistent minorities are the most influential
SUGGESTS consistent view is min. requirement for minority influence
(S) Research Support for Deeper Processing
Martin et al - ppl were less willing to change the initial viewpoint given if they had listen to an agreeing minority group vs a majority
SUGGESTS minority messages were deeply processed + had a more enduring affect - central to how minority influence works
Counter to Research Support for Deeper Processing (L)
Real-world social influence is more complicated than controlled research
- Minorities have committed to cause due to often facing hostile opposition which is absent in research - just smallest group
THUS Martin et al’s findings are limited in its application to real-world situations
(L) Artificial Tasks e.g. Moscovici et al’s + identifying colours
- Research is far removed from minorities trying to change behaviour of majorities
=> e.g. jury decisions + political campaigning w/ v important outcomes that can be life or death
SUGGESTS findings of minority studies lack external validity
(L) EXTRA: Power of Minority Influence
In Moscivici’s study agreement w/ a consistent minority was low - 8%
SUGGESTS minority influence is quite rare + not a useful concept
However, when pps wrote answers privately = more likey to agree w/ minority view
SUGGESTS view expressed by people in public is “tip of the iceberg’