Social Influence Flashcards
Social Influence
The change in behaviour one person causes in another with intentionally or unintentionally, often due to group pressure and can also lead to c change in opinion as well as behaviour
Conformity
Process by which someones attitude, opinions, beliefs or behaviours are changed by the presence or actions of another
Three types of conformity
. Compliance - Shallow
. Identification
. Internalisation - Deep
Compliance
Person conforms publicly but disagrees privately, usually done to fit in with a group and conformity stops when you leave the group so is temporary, has little impact and is the shallowest
Identification
Person conforms both publicly and privately because they have identified with the group and feel a sense of membership. E.g football club supporters usually bound to the area you live in
Internalisation
Person conforms both publicly and privately because they have internalised and accept the views and beliefs of the group norm, deepest form of conformity and is permanent for example you live with vegans and yourself become a vegan
Normative Social Influence (NSI)
The desire to be liked and agreeing with the opinion of a group majority so they are accepted and approved
Informational Social Influence (ISI)
The desire to be right and agreeing with the opinion of the majority because they believe that it is correct and they desire to also be correct
Strengths of NSI
. Supported by Asch’s research, found a 36.8% conformity rate and found that people answered questions wrong due to anxiety of going against the group.
. Shows c + e relationship
. Uses Standardised procedures
Limitations of NSI
. The explanation is affected by individual differences, not everyone affected by NSI in the same way thus low explanatory power as we don’t really know the reason some people desire to be liked and some don’t
. Smith and Bond (1998) found cultural differences between eastern and western countries in regard to levels of conformity, eastern cultures value family and friends needs more, cant be generalized and isn’t representative
Jenness (1932) conformity study details
. Asked participant to guess the number of beans in a jar
. Asked participants to form groups of 3 and come up with a group estimate
. Gave the participants a chance to change their answers
. Found after being in a group, their results shift more is towards the group estimate
. Shows informational social influence
What does Jenness’s study show
Informational Social Influence
Sherif (1935) conformity study details
. Placed participants in a dark room
. A small light was projected on a screen and they were asked to estimate how far it traveled
. When estimating alone found lots of variance between answers
. When estimating in groups, estimates became very similar despite there being a large variance when estimating separately
Limitations of Sherif’s and Jenness’s study
. Lacks temporal validity
. Occurred in a lab setting, artificial environment
. Lacks ecological validity
. Ambiguous
Asch Research (1951 and 1955)
. Line comparison test
. 123 male undergraduates tested individually
. 6 - 8 Confederates, all instructed to give the same wrong answers
. Real participant sat last or second to last to see if they conform to group pressure