Simine Vazire and Erika N. Carlson - others knowing better than us?? Flashcards

1
Q

What are blind spots?

A

mis-perception we have of ourselves due to simply a lack of knowledge or due to motivated distortions in our self-perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the causes of blind spots?

A
  1. Motivated cognitive processes
  2. efficient way of processing info
    - Discrepancies between implicit + explicit perceptions of their own personality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does a motivated cognitive processes result in blind spots?

A
  1. Sedikides + Gregg, 2008 Motive = maintain + enhance self worth
  2. even if it may not be positive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do discrepancies between implicit + slef-perception of their own personality result in blind spots?

A
  1. Back, Schmukle + Egloff (2009)
    - implicit self-views of personality predicted behaviour even after controlling for what could be predicted from their explicit self-views
    - strongest amongst extraversion + neuroticism = non-evaluative traits + people typically report honestly
    - people have implicit knowledge about their pattern of behaviour that they cannot report explicitly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the difference between explicit and implicit self-perception?

A
  1. Implicit = automatic associations w/ specific traits/ behaviours (based on previous patters) = more accurate
  2. Explicit = associations made consciously
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is there to suggest having blind spots may not be an efficient way of processing info?

A
  • should be able to increase congruence between explicit + implicit self-views by focusing attention on behavioural manifestation of our implicit personality BUT not the case
  • Hoffmann, Gschwendner + Schmitt 2009 video of themselves (implict behaiours) were unable to combine it with their explicit views of themselves
  • even strangers were able to detect the implicit aspects of the target personalities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are our conscience self-perceptions valuable but incomplete?

A
  • motive sometimes causing us to ignore aspects of personality that others can detect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are some explanations for why other people know more about us?

A
  • info given indirectly, social media, taste of music

- bits of our personality in our day-to-day interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is important to consider when looking at others who may potentially know us better?

A

Level of acquaintance
Thomas + Fletcher, 2003 better you get along the more accurate they can infer our thoughts + feelings

BUT NOT SUPER CLOSE
- as they may be subjected to same bias/ distortions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What evidence is there suggesting the self- and other- perceptions are roughly good at predicting?

A
  1. Kolar, Funder, & Colvin, 1996; Vazire, 2010 Behaviour in lab + group discussion
  2. Vazire & Mehl, 2008 Behaviour when out with friends
    BUT
    they each seem to capture different aspects of the personality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the SOKA model by Vazire?

A

Self-Other Knowledge asymmetry

- maps out aspects of personality that are known uniquely known to self or other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

According to the Andersen, Glassman + Gold, 1988, the difference between what we know about ourselves and others are at random but driven by?

A
  1. Differences between the info available to the self + others
  2. Motivational biases that differentially affect perceptions of the self + other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

According to Vazire, what type of info is aviable for the self and other?

A

Self: internal, so better at judging internal t+ neutral traits
- thoughts, feelings
Other: External, do better at judging external traits
- overt behaviour eg charm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do the self and other process highly evaluative traits like rudeness + intelligence?

A

SELF: severely distorted by biases
- protect self-esteem
OTHER: mostly accurate assuming they have sufficient info
- friend’s rating = good predictor of actual behaviour although it may be more overly positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

To know a person, what do we need, according to research?

A
  1. how they see themselves

2. How they are seen by others who know them well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can we get access to other’s knowledge to help improve our self-knowledge?

A
  1. Meta-perception - take other’s perspective of own personality
  2. introspection
  3. self-affirmation
  4. Training in mindfulness meditation
17
Q

Why has introspection no longer suggested to be effective for getting to know ourselves?

A

limited introspection as many aspects of ourselves are hidden from conscious awareness

18
Q

What did Carlson, Furr + Vazire (2010) find about the use of meta-perception to increase knowledge of self?

A

people are aware of how we seem to others but do not seem to be very good at using the knowledge to help the knowledge of our self
- So maybe focus on impression on others?

19
Q

How do self-affirmation and training in mindfulness meditation help to improve knowledge of self?

A
  1. Self-affirmation Critcher, Dunning + Armor, 2010
    - reduces defensive responding + more open to negative info about ourselves
  2. Training in mindfulness meditation
    - non-judgemental attention to one’s current xp
    - improves emotions-regulation skills, memory + attention + improves ability to differentiate between transient emotional xp vs global dispositions (Williams, 2010)