interpersonal attraction + romantic relationships Flashcards

1
Q

Why are we so interested in interpersonal attraction/ connection?

A
  1. Cacioppo et al, 2006 lack of contact = more depressed + lonely
  2. Diener, 1984 more positive mood reported with more interpersonal relations
  3. William et al, 1992 increased survival rate
  4. Coan et al, 2006 Reduces stress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Coan et al (2006) do to find physical contact with a person you have an interpersonal relationship with can reduce stress?

A
  1. wife in a scanner
    - if they see blue light, no shock
    - red lift = chance of shock
  2. Made them hold hand with partner, stranger or no-one
    - partner physical contact = less stress experienced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do we go about finding our partner?

A
  1. GET FAMILIAR
    - Mere Exposure Effect
  2. Be Nice
    - halo effect
  3. Look into each other’s eyes
  4. Pay attention to names
  5. Look for similarity
    - a mirror image
  6. Pick a positive person
  7. Meet them in a nice place
  8. try something scary for your first date
  9. Self-disclosure
    (10) spicy food
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Moreland + Beach 1992 find supporting the mere exposure effect?

A
  1. Had confederate - 4 professors
  2. Manipulated how often the confederates attended the lectures
  3. All sessions, decreasing to no attendance
    - when asked students to rate who they liked the most + felt similar to = professor who attended the most
    EVEN thot there was no interaction!! wowowo
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Back et al 2008 find supporting the mere exposure effect?

A
  1. New students randomly allocated seats
  2. Asked to rate id they wanted to interact with the person later
    - found friendship could be predicted by how close you were sat next to each other

Festering - proximity to person could predict how close you would be with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the halo effect?

A

judgement is coloured by one positive info seen/ given

- very difficult to overcome even when you know

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Sampo Paunonen 2006 find supporting the halo effect?

A
  1. Showed picture
  2. Described them as intelligent, independent, honest
    - found they were given higher ratings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Gross + Crofton 1977 find supporting the halo effect?

A
  1. Shown a picture
  2. Asked to read favourable or unfavourable description
    - found favourable description = higher ratings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why do we want to be rated as more attractive?

A
  1. Clifford + Walster, 1973 Teachers give attractive students higher scores
  2. Chaiken, 1979 People more likely to donate and so are better at raising money
  3. Downs + Lyson 1993 given lower criminal sentences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What evidence is there supporting the mere exposure effect?

A
  1. . Chinese ideographs - ones they had seen before made them say it was a positive character vs new charcter
  2. . Hoorens et al, 1990
    - letter W + french student letters + boo!!
  3. Harmon-Jones + Allen, 2001
    - familiar faces = more liking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was found about people who were rated as attractive and their interaction with their mother?

A

Langlois et al, 1995

- had more playful + affectionate mothers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Kalick et al 1998 find about attractiveness and health?

A
  • attractive people were said to also be healthier
  • but didn’t correlate with health records
    Dion et al 1972 What is beautiful is good stereotype
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Kellerman et al 1989 find about looking into each other’s eyes and attraciton?

A
  1. looking at eyes vs hands with unacquainted male-female pairs
    - 2 min gazing = tingling feeling + higher rating of attraction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What research is there to support the need to pay attention to names when looking for a romantic partner?

A
  1. Jones et al 2004 partner’s name often start with same letter
  2. Anseel + Duyck 2009 company’s name begin with same letter as first initial
  3. Seem to determine jobs
    - D = 2.4x more likely to become a dentist
    - Over representation of george + geoffrey in geology
    - A = better at assessments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What evidence is there for people looking for similarity over beauty (Buston + Emlen 2003)?

A
  • Selfhour et al 2009 PERCEIVED similarity in personality associated with more friendship
  • repeating back order increases tip for waitresses
  • attitude similarity + attraction = linear relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What evidence is there for picking/ being a positive person to increase perception of attractiveness?

A
  1. Berscheid et al 1996 8+ > 9+1-
  2. Skowronski + Carlston 1987 Negative info recalled better
  3. Coleman et al 1987 Criticism more sincere?
17
Q

What is the loss-gain hypothesis and why is it important in being perceived as attractive?

A

Aronson + Mettee 1974

  • can’t just say nice things all the time, as people will start to question + lose effect
  • we like people most if they initially dislike us then later like us
18
Q

Why is it important to try and meet your partner in a nice place?

A

Evaluative conditioning

  • associate the person with the pleasant/ unpleasant xp + place
    1. Griffitt 1970 pleasant room vs hot stuffy = lower attractiveness ratings
    2. Maslow + Mintz 1056 Elegant vs shabby = lower attractiveness ratings
19
Q

What did Dutton + Aron find suggesting the place you meet can affect how you perceive and continue to interact with the person?

A
  1. High bridge, pretty scenery, high risk
  2. middle, confederate, call me back
  3. high bridge = more call backs vs low bridge, low risk
    - false association of feelings to person
    - not able to correctly identify where our feelings are derived from
20
Q

Should you eat spicy food or sweet food on a date?

A

Spicy

- we attribute the spicy arousal to person = higher ratings in attractiveness

21
Q

Other than scary movies, what else could you do to associate the arousal you xp to a partner?

A

Foster et al 1998

  • roller-coaster rides
  • physical exercise
22
Q

What is said to have an additive effect to the increased arousal via various activities you do together with partner?

A

Darley + Berscheid 1976
Anticipatory liking

  • the more you think you will like it, the more you will associate with the person with you
23
Q

Why should we disclose information about ourself in order to find our partner?

A
1. Altman + Taylor 1973 
Social Penetration Theory
2. Collins + Miller 1974
the more both people disclose the more we like them
3. Aron et al 1997
45 min interaction
4. Whitty 2008
online relationships = faster self-disclosure
24
Q

What did Aron et al 1997 find about the importance of self-disclosure in relationships?

A
  1. Strangers paired
  2. 15 min low intimacy topic
  3. 15 min high intimacy topic
  4. 15 min more self-disclosure
  5. Control group = small talk
    - self-disclosing group reported higher rates of attraction + closeness
25
Q

What did Bartels + Zeki 2000 find suggesting you can be addicted to love?

A
  1. Put ppl in fMRI scans
  2. showed pic of friend or partner
    - partner = light up same place as when drugs are taken
    - if pic of ex/ enemy = anger area stimulated
26
Q

In what ways can a relationship develop after the initial honeymoon phase?

A
1. Huston + Chorost 1994
2 yrs of marriage - 1/2 as often affection is expressed
2. H Fisher 1994
4 yrs, divorce rates peaks 
3. Hatfield
if it endures = companionate love 
- steadier afterglow