Short Answer Chp. 4-6 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define social perception.

A

Social perception is a general term for the processes by which people come to understand one another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe how the perception of other people can be influenced by their physical appearance.

A

skin colour, hair, tattoos…

People pre-judge one another by facial features.
People with baby faced features tend to be seen as warm, kind, naive, weak, honest and submissive. Adults with more mature features - smaller eyes, rougher skin- are seen as stronger and more dominant.

We sometimes infer attitudes that we assume the individual holds, just on the basis of their faces.

Attractive people are deemed to be more li

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define scripts. What are the functions of scripts in social perception?

A

Preset notions about certain types of situations that enable us to anticipate the goals, behaviors, and outcomes likely to occur in a particular setting.

Knowledge of social settings provides an important context for understanding other people’s verbal and nonverbal behaviour.

Scripts influence social perceptions in two ways: 1) We sometimes see what we expect to see in a particular situation. 2) People use what they know about social situations to explain the causes of human behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Identify the six “primary” emotions expressed by the face, regardless of culture.

A

Happiness, sadness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe how people use non-verbal cues such as body language, eye contact, and touch to judge others.

A

People form impressions of others based on how they walk.
People assume someone who avoids eye contact is evasive, cold, fearful and someone who stares is tense, angry and unfriendly.
First impressions we form of others may be influenced by the quality of our handshake.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which channels of communication are most likely to reveal that someone is lying? Are these channels the same as the channels that perceivers use to detect deception?

A

The face can communicate emotion, but it is relatively easy for deceivers to control, unlike the nervous movements of the hands and feet.

Four channels of communication provide info: words, face, body, voice. The voice is the most telling channel; when people lie, they tend to hesitate, then speed up and raise the pitch of their voice.

Perceives tend to think that people avert their eyes, or fidget and squirm when lying. Research does not support this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are attribution theories?

A

A group of theories that describe how people explain the causes of behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Distinguish between personal and situational attributions.

A

Personal attribution is attribution to personal characteristics of an actor, such as ability, personality, mood, or effort.

Situational attribution is attribution to factors external to an actor, such as the task, other people, or luck.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Briefly describe Jones’s correspondent inference theory.

A

According to Jones and Davis, each of us tries to understand other people by observing and analyzing their behaviour. Their correspondent inference theory predicts that people try to infer from an action, whether the act itself corresponds to an enduring personal characteristic of the actor. Is the person who donates money altruistic? Is the aggressive person a beast? People answer these questions based on 3 factors:

1) The person’s degree of choice. Behaviour that is freely chosen, is more informative about a person than behaviour that is coerced.
2) The expectedness of behaviour. An action tells us more about a person when it departs from the norm that when it is typical, part of a societal role, or otherwise expected under the circumstances. Therefore, people think they know more about a person, when that person acts outside the norm.
3) People consider the intended effects, or consequences of someone’s behaviour. Acts that produce many desirable outcomes do not reveal a person’s specific motives as clearly as acts that produce only a single desireable outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Briefly describe Kelley’s covariation theory.

A

According to Kelley, people make attributions by using the covariation principle: In order for something to be the cause of a behaviour, it must be present when the behaviour occurs and absent when it does not. Three kinds of covariation info are particularly useful: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are cognitive heuristics (in general)?

A

Info-processing rules of thumb that enable us to think in ways that are quick and easy but that frequently lead to error.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define the availability heuristic, and give a personal example.

A

Availability Heuristic is the tendency to estimate the likelihood that an event will occur by how easily instances of it come to mind.

Ex: People from Sudbury that listen to heavy metal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define the false-consensus effect and the base-rate fallacy. Explain how the availability heuristic can give rise to the false-consensus effect and the base-rate fallacy.

A

False-consensus effect: The tendency for people to overestimate the extent to which others share their opinions, attributes, and behaviours.

Base-rate fallacy: The finding that people are relatively insensitive to consensus info presented in the form of numerical base rates and are instead influenced by dramatic, graphic events.

We tend to associate with others who are like us in important ways, so we are more likely to notice and recall instances of similar rather than dissimilar behaviour.
Also, social perceptions are influenced more by one vivid life story than by hard statistics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define counter-factural thinking. When is counter-factural thinking likely to occur?

A

Counterfactual thinking is the tendency to imagine alternative events or outcomes that might have occurred but did not.

People’s top three regrets center on education, career and romance, in that order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define the fundamental attribution error.

A

The fundamental attribution error is the tendency to focus on the role of personal causes and underestimate the impact of situations on other people’s behaviour, this error is sometimes called correspondence bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Summarize the two-step process model that explains the occurrence of the fundamental attribution error. What factors make the fundamental attribution error less likely to occur?

A

Automatic first step: we identify the behaviour and make a quick personal attribution.
Second: We adjust or correct that inference to account for situational influences.

18
Q

Define the actor-observer effect. How is this attribution bias different from the fundamental attribution error?

A

The tendency to attribute our own behaviour to situational causes and the behaviour of others to personal factors.

19
Q

What is the “belief in a just world”? What function does this belief serve?

A

The belief that individuals get what they deserve in life, an orientation that leads people to disparage victims.

It helps people cope and acts as a buffer against stress.

20
Q

Describe the summation model and the averaging model of impression formation. Illustrate each model with an example.

A

Impression formation: The process of integrating info about a person to form a coherent impression.

The summation model of impression formation: the more positive traits there are, the better.

Averaging model: The higher the average value of all the various traits, the better.

21
Q

Describe information integration theory. How do characteristics of the perceiver influence impression formation? How do characteristics of the target influence impression formation?

A

Information integration theory is the theory that impressions are based on perceiver dispositions and a weighted average of a target person’s traits.

We tend to use ourselves as a standard, or frame of reference, when evaluating others. People also tend to see their own traits and skills as particularly desirable for others to have.

A perceiver’s current, mood can also influence the impressions formed of others.

Social perceivers are more likely to agree in their judgments of a target’s extroversion, that is, the extent to which he or she is sociable, friendly, outgoing and adventurous. This characteristic is easy to spot.

The valence of a trait- whether it is considered socially desirable- also affects its impact on our final impressions. Research shows that people exhibit a trait negativity bias- the tendency for negative info to weigh more heavily than positive info

22
Q

Describe the implicit personality theory, and explain how it affects a person’s impression of other people.

A

Implicit personality theory: a network of assumptions that we hold about relationships among various types of people, traits and behaviours. Knowing that someone has one trait, leads us to infer that she has other traits as well.

23
Q

What are central traits? How do central traits affect a person’s impression of other people?

A

Central traits imply the presence of certain other traits and exert a powerful influence on final impressions.

24
Q

What is the primacy effect with respect to impression formation? Provide two main explanations for the primary effect.

A

Primacy effect: the tendency for info presented early in a sequence to have more impact on impressions than info presented later.

Two reasons:

Once perceivers think they have formed an accurate impression of someone, they tend to pay less attention to subsequent info, especially when tired or under pressure.

Change of meaning hypothesis: Once people have formed an impression, they start to interpret inconsistent info in light of that impression.

25
Q

Describe how people’s beliefs can create the reality they expect (e.g., belief perseverance and self-fulfilling prophecy).

A

Belief perseverance: The tendency to maintain beliefs even after they have been discredited.

Self-fulfilling prophecy: The process by which one’s expectations about a person eventually lead that person to behave in ways that confirm those expectations.

26
Q

Distinguish between discrimination, prejudice, and stereotypes.

A

Discrimination: Negative behaviour directed against persons because of their membership in a particular group.

Prejudice: Refers to the negative feelings towards persons based on their membership in certain groups.

Stereotypes: Beliefs or associations that link groups of people with certain characteristics.

Ingroups are groups we identify with; we contrast these with outgroups.

27
Q

Describe the process by which stereotypes are formed.

A

How and why do people form stereotypes? The commonsense answer to these questions is captured in social learning theory. Simply put, we learn stereotypes from parents (our first and most influential teachers), significant others (e.g., peers), and the media. True enough. Research supports commonsense here but also indicates that commonsense does not tell the whole story.
Another explanation for how we form stereotypes comes from research in cognitive psychology on the categorization process. People like to, want to, need to categorize the world, both the social and physical world, into preferably neat little groups. They inevitably do so (i.e., categorize) for 3 reasons.
1) it’s cognitively efficient - once you have categorized you no longer need to consider information about each individual member of the group. You can apply all of the group information to all of its members. Categorization saves processing timeorized you no longer need to consider information about each individual member of the group. You can apply all of the group information to all of its members. Categorization saves processing time.
2) it satisfies the need to understand and predict the social world. You no longer need to wonder what each individual is like (understand), or what he or she is likely to do (predict). All of this is contained in the stereotype.
3) it’s a way to feel better about yourself; we think our groups (ingroups) are better than other groups (outgroups)- the INGROUP FAVORABILITY BIAS

Negative stereotypes of outgroups can help justify the desire to exclude outgroups, and the stereotypes in turn can fuel even more prejudice and discrimination.

28
Q

What are the advantages and disadvantages of social categorization?

A

By grouping people the way we group foods, animals and other objects, we form impressions quickly and use past experience to guide new interactions. We save time by using a person’s group membership to make inferences about them.

Categorizing people leads us to overestimate the differences between groups and underestimate the differences within groups.Ingroups: Groups with which an individual feels a sense of membership, belonging and identity.

29
Q

Differentiate in-groups from out-groups. How are in-group members perceived differently from out-group members?

A

Ingroups: Groups with which an individual feels a sense of membership, belonging and identity.

Outgroups: Groups with which an individual does not feel a sense of membership, belonging, or identity.

30
Q

How do illusory correlations, attributional processes, subtyping, and confirmation biases help perpetuate stereotypes?

A

Illusory correlation is a tendency for people to overstimate the link between variables that are only slightly correlated, or not at all correlated. This happens in two ways 1) people tend to overestimate the association between variables that are distinctive. That is, variables that capture attention (news) because they are novel, or horrific or unusual. 2) people tend to overestimate the association between variables that they already expect to go together.

Implications for stereotyping:
People overestimate the joint occurrence of distinct variables they expect to be associated with each other, such as stereotyped groups and stereotyped behaviours. Also, Unless otherwise motivated, people overestimate the joint occurrence of distinctive variables such as minority groups and deviant acts.

Attributions:
People maintain stereotypes through how they explain the behaviours of others. Perceivers may see confirmation of the stereotype, instead of recognizing the consequences of the discrimination.

Subtyping:
Subtyping occurs when perceivers respond to members of a target group who disconfirm their stereotypes by seeing them as exceptions to the rule and placing them in a separate subcategory apart from members who confirm the stereotype.

Confirmation Bias:
The effects of stereotyping on people’s perceptions is a type of confirmation bias. It involves people’s tendencies to interpret, seek and create info that seems to confirm their expectations

31
Q

Describe briefly the Robbers Cave study. What is the significance of the results of this study?

A

A small group of 11 year old boys, all strangers, all white, arrived at a 200 acre camp. They spent a week hiking etc and bonding and gave themselves a name, printed it on T-shirts. They believed they were the only ones at the camp, but there was another group and a tournament was arranged between the two groups, only after each group had formed their own culture.

The two groups participated in many events, where they were awarded prizes and a trophy was promised to the winning group. The groups became fierce rivals, flags were burned, cabins were ransacked and continued to escalate.

Researchers tried to bring peace by saying nice things about each group to the opposite group, brought the groups together during non competitive circumstances, but it didn’t work.
What did work was superordinate goals: mutual goals that could be achieved only through cooperation between the groups

32
Q

Describe the realistic conflict theory. What role does relative deprivation play in fostering prejudice?

A

The view that direct competition for valuable but limited resources breeds hostility between groups is called realistic conflict theory.

There is much more to prejudice than real competition. The realistic competition for resources may be in fact imagined. Also, people may become resentful of other groups-not because if their conviction that their own security or resources are threatened, but because of their sense of relative deprivation- the belief that they fare poorly compared to others.

33
Q

What are the alternative views to cognitive dissonance as an explanation for self-persuasion?

A

Alternate explanations of dissonance-related attitude change have been proposed. Self perception theory states that people logically infer their attitudes by observing their own behaviours. Impression-management theory says that people are motivated only to appear consistent to others. Self esteem theorists state that dissonance is triggered by threats to the self-concept and can be reduced indirectly, without a change in attitude, through self-affirming experiences.

34
Q

Describe the realistic conflict theory. What role does relative deprivation play in fostering prejudice?

A

The view that direct competition for valuable but limited resources breeds hostility between groups is called realistic conflict theory.

There is much more to prejudice than real competition. The realistic competition for resources may be in fact imagined. Also, people may become resentful of other groups-not because if their conviction that their own security or resources are threatened, but because of their sense of relative deprivation- the belief that they fare poorly compared to others.

35
Q

Describe social identity theory. How does this theory account for ingroup favouritism?

A

According to social identity theory, each of us strives to enhance our self-esteem, which has two components 1) a personal identity, and 2) various collective or social identities that are based on the groups to which we belong.

In other words, people can boost their self esteem through achievement, or affiliation with successful groups.

Social identity leads us to derive pride from our connections with others, even if we don’t receive any direct benefits from these others. Often though, we feel the need to belittle “them” in order to make “us” feel secure.

36
Q

When and how do children first learn about their gender identity and about gender stereotypes?

A

Distinguish men from women well before their first birthday, identify themselves as boys or girls by three, form gender stereotypic beliefs and preferences about stories, and toys soon after, and favour their own gender over the other.
Children begin early to distinguish between masculine and feminine behaviours.
Children learn gender stereotypes and roles from their parents and other role models.

37
Q

Identify the sociocultural factors that help to strengthen and maintain gender stereotypes.

A
  • Mothers spend more time talking with boys about numbers than they do to girls, which may decrease girls awareness of these concepts.
  • Mothers of daughters intervene more quickly when child is engaging in risky behaviour.

Social role theory: The theory that small gender differences are magnified in perception by the contrasting social roles occupied by men and women.

-Media effects: stereotyping exists in the media and can influence viewers.

38
Q

Describe how discrimination is perceived by the target of discrimination. How does such perception affect the target’s self-esteem and feelings of control?

A

Attributing negative feedback to discrimination can protect one’s overall self esteem, however, it can also make people feel as if they have less persona; control over their lives.
Perceiving persistent discrimination over time is associated with a number of physical and mental health problems with mental health and drug use.

39
Q

What is stereotype threat? Why does stereotype threat occur, and what are its potential consequences?

A

Stereotype threat is the experience of concern about being evaluated based on negative stereotypes about one’s group.

It hangs like a “threat in the air” while the person
is in the stereotype-relevant situation. This threat can interfere with performance, by increasing anxiety and triggering distracting thoughts. Also, if the threat is persistent, it may lead people to disidentify with the institution, or domain-to dismiss it as no longer relevant to their self-esteem and identity.

One does not need to believe in a negative stereotype in order for it to have an effect. Just knowing about the stereotype is enough, especially if the person identifies strongly with the group and cares about doing well.
Stereotype threat exerts its control through multiple processes:
-Physiological arousal-may interfere with people’s ability to perform well on the task at hand
- Causing threatened individuals to suppress thoughts impairs working memory

40
Q

Describe the contact hypothesis. List the conditions that intergroup contact must satisfy for prejudice to decrease.

A

The theory that direct contact between hostile groups will reduce prejudice under certain situations.

Four conditions are deemed important for intergroup contact to serve as a treatment for racism:

1) Equal status: The contact should occur in circumstances that give the two groups equal status.
2) Personal interaction: The contact should involve one-on-one interactions among individual members of the two groups.
3) Cooperative Activities: Members of the two groups should join together in an effort to achieve super-ordinate goals.

41
Q

Describe the jigsaw classroom and explain how it improves race relations.

A

The jigsaw classroom is a cooperative learning method. Students are assigned to small, racially and academically mixed groups. Each student is responsible for learning one piece of the puzzle after which all members take turns teaching their piece to the other students.

Compared to students in traditional classrooms, the jigsaw students grew to like each other more, liked school more, were less prejudiced, and had higher self-esteem. Academic test scores improved for minority students and stayed the same for white students.