RPH - finals Flashcards
catholic mass in the Philippines
March 31, 1521
- It is what Ferdinand Magellan named in the Philippines
Archipelago of St. Lazarus
- Originally taught was the place the first mass took place
Island of Limasawa, Leyte
- Made some Philippine Historian question the veracity of the Limasawa location
Golden Tara in Butuan
- Island where Pigafetta believe the first mass took place
Mazaua
– palmo jar of plam wine
Uraca
banana
palmo
rice
umay
earrings
Schione
– small boat
Boloto
– [Sumatra] formerly known as Traprobana
Zamatra
– brother
Casi casi
- cross, nails and a crown
- A sign they had been there and be free immediately when captured
Tokens
their god
Abba
– largest and the one with most trade
Zubu
– was repeated when cross was erected in position
Pater Noster and an Ave Maria
- The National Historical Commission of the Philippines (NHCP) has officially declared Limasawa, Southern Leyte, as the site of the first Easter Sunday Mass in the Philippines in 1521. This decision was made after a thorough review by a panel of experts, taking into account various historical evidence and requests from institutions like the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines. This declaration is significant as the Philippines prepares to commemorate the 500th anniversary of the introduction of Christianity.
July 15, 2020 resolution no. 2
- Mandates NHCP to actively engage to historical personages, places, dates and events.
RA no. 10086 (Strengthening People’s Nationalism Act of 2009
- Beginning of Filipino nationalism – cavite munity
January 20, 1872
- Execution of GOMBURZA at Bagumbayan (Luneta), Manila
February 17, 1872
GOMBURZA
- Mariano Gomez
- Jose Apolonio Burgos
- Jacinto Zamora
- Spanish historian
- Attempt of indios or natives to overthrow the Spanish Government
Jose Montero y Vidal
- Implicate the native clergy – active in the call of secularization -> arrest & execution of GBZ
- Abolition of privileges of the workers in the arsenal of Cavite
Governor-General Rafael Izquierdo
- a Spanish official, wrote a detailed account of the Cavite Mutiny. He portrayed it as a major revolt aimed at overthrowing Spanish rule and killing Spanish officials. He blamed the three Filipino priests, Gomburza, for leading the uprising. His account, written in 1895, was strongly anti-Filipino and supported the Spanish government’s harsh response to the mutiny.
Jose Montero y Vidal
- a Filipino scholar and politician, offered a different perspective on the Cavite Mutiny. He argued that it was a localized uprising by disgruntled workers, not a nationwide conspiracy to overthrow Spanish rule. He blamed the friars and conservative elements in Manila for exaggerating the event and using it to suppress reformist and anti-friar sentiments. Pardo believed that the harsh punishments imposed on many Filipinos, including the execution of Gomburza, damaged the relationship between Filipinos and Spaniards, ultimately contributing to the Philippine Revolution of 1896.
Pardo de Tavera
- The year _______ is a significant year in Philippine history, often overshadowed by 1896 and 1898. Two major events happened in 1872: the Cavite Mutiny and the execution of the Gomburza (Mariano Gómez, José Burgos, and Jacinto Zamora).
1872
- Philippines’ Independence Day
June 12 every year (since 1898)
- Year of Philippine Revolution
1896
- Cavite Mutiny
- Execution of GOMBURZA
1872
– high court
Audencia
- District of Sampaloc celebrated the feast of the Virgin of Loreto
January 20,1872
- Launched an attack targeting Spanish officers at sight and seized the arsenal
- They mistook the fireworks as the sign of attack
Sergeant Lamadrid
- Filipino scholar and researcher
- Mutiny by native filipino soldiers and laborers who are dissatisfied with the abolition of their privileges.
Dr. Trinidad Hermenigildo Pardo de Tavera
– Short formula, appeared in El Imparcial the day after Rizal’s execution.
Fourth Text