Research Methods- methods and techniques Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is a lab experiment?

A

When the experiment occurs in a controlled environment- the IV is manipulated by the researcher, they control as many extraneous variables as possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strengths/ Weaknesses of Lab Experiments?

A

strength: high levels of reliability due to control over extraneous variables
weakness: lacks ecological validity (artificial environment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a field experiment?

A

When the experiment occurs in the participants’ natural environment- IV is still manipulated to see effect on DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of field experiments?

A

strength: high levels of ecological validity
weakness: low level of reliability- little to no control over extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a quasi experiment?

A

When the IV in an experiment is not directly manipulated, as it is naturally occurring (e.g. a blind person vs a non blind person)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of quasi experiments?

A

strength: high ecological validity, high population validity
weakness: low reliability (both internal and external)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is an observation used as a method?

A

No manipulation of variables, behaviour is just observed and recorded
(e.g. a student observes how often parents talk to their children in a supermarket)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How is an observation used as a technique?

A

It is used to gather info for another research method.
(e.g. the speed at which woodlice run away from red or blue light- the colour of the light (IV) is manipulated by researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a naturalistic observation?

A

Spontaneous behaviour is recorded in participants’ own, natural environment- researcher interference is kept to a minimum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of a naturalistic observation?

A

strengths: high ecological validity, reduced chance of demand characteristics
weaknesses: lack of control (replication risks observer bias), ethical issues (lacks informed consent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How could a naturalistic observation affect the validity of research?

A
  • Higher validity- participants unlikely to know they’re being watched so reduced risk of observer bias
  • Lower validity- more extraneous variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a controlled observation?

A

Conditions of the experiment are created by the researcher- carried out in ‘lab type situation’
The variables are manipulated by researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of a controlled observation?

A

strengths: high reliability (researcher controls extraneous variables), informed consent
weaknesses: low ecological validity (artificial setting), increased demand characteristics and observer effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a participant observation?

A

Observer joins in with activities with the group rather than just plain observing/ recording

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of participant observations?

A

strengths: higher validity of findings (first-hand observation)
weaknesses: relies on observer’s memory= lower accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a non- participant observation?

A

Observer doesn’t join in with activities, they observe ‘from a distance’ (e.g. sat at the back of a room)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of a non-participant observation?

A

strengths: allows lots of both qualitative and quantitative data to be collected
weakness: less validity

18
Q

What is a covert observation?

A

Observer is hidden (undercover)

19
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of a covert observation?

A

strength: lower chance of demand characteristics
weakness: ethical issues- deception, informed consent

20
Q

What is an overt observation?

A

Observer is out in the open (visible to participants)

21
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of overt observations?

A

strength: ethical issues avoided (informed consent, right to withdraw)
weakness: demand characteristics

22
Q

What is a structured recording?

A

It uses a coding method and uses previously determined specific behaviours (behavioural categories) to look out for, therefore providing structure

23
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of structured recordings?

A

strengths: high inter-rater reliability (consistent results), observer bias is reduced, time efficient, quantitative data is produced
weaknesses: lower validity (could miss out on other behaviours not written down)

24
Q

What is an unstructured recording?

A

Any behaviours of interest aren’t clearly specified prior to observation- the observer makes notes on any behaviour that they see during the period

25
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of unstructured recordings?

A

strength: improves validity- you can record anything that happens
weaknesses: less inter-rater reliability, quantitative data becomes qualitative (therefore subjective), not as time efficient

26
Q

What is a questionnaire?

A

respondents write down their own answers

27
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of a questionnaire?

A

strengths: responses are honest if there is confidentiality (high response rate= representative findings), quantitative data- objective
weaknesses: people can’t expand on answers (lacks qualitative insights), ‘best fit’ answers may be made due to closed questions- reduces validity

28
Q

What is a structured interview?

A

Respondents are asked pre-determined questions

29
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of structured interviews?

A

strengths: qualitative= more detail= more valid, answers are easily comparable (more reliable)
weaknesses: may answer dishonestly (social desirability bias)

30
Q

What is an unstructured interview?

A

Respondents are asked undetermined questions (on-the-spot questions)

31
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of unstructured interviews?

A

strength: flexible responses= more detail= increased validity
weaknesses: difficult to repeat (different questions= less reliable), people may get side-tracked

32
Q

What is a semi-structured interview?

A

Some questions asked are pre-determined, the rest are developed as a response to previous answers (on-the-spot questions)

33
Q

strengths/ weaknesses of semi-structured interviews?

A

strength: both qualitative and quantitative insight
weakness: may get side-tracked on the developed questions.

34
Q

What are any potential problems with self-reports?

A

Reliability- questions may never be asked again/ in the same order (lacks external reliability)
Interviewer bias
Dishonesty
Low response rate
Population validity- may not be applicable

35
Q

What is a correlation?

A

Looks at relationship between two co-variables
[correlation DOES NOT = causation]
They also check if it is appropriate/ possible to do an experiment

36
Q

What is a positive correlation?

A

The variables move in the same direction- as one increases, so does the other (and vice versa)
1+ represents a perfect positive correlation

37
Q

What is a negative correlation?

A

The variables move in opposite directions- as one variable increases, the other decreases (and vice versa)
1- represents a perfect negative correlation

38
Q

What does it mean if there is no correlation?

A

There is no relationship between the two co-variables
0 represents no correlation

39
Q

strengths of correlations?

A

provides a starting point for research
more time efficient (prevents time wasting on experiments)
strong face validity
quantitative results- easy to analyse, objective

40
Q

weaknesses of correlations?

A

data doesn’t explain WHY there is a relationship
doesn’t establish cause and effect
lacks general usefulness
no construct validity (doesn’t measure for sure what is needed)