Core Study 12- Lee (D) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Background

Why is previous research a limitation?

A

Nearly all previous research research was conducted with children in Western countries

Ethnocentric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Aim

What was the aim of Lee’s study into evaluations of lying and truth telling?

A

To investigate cross-cultural differences in children’s understanding and moral valuations of lying.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sample

How many Chinese children were recruited?

What was their economical status?

A

120 (mix of genders)

Unknown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why is the economical status of the Chinese students not valuable in the study?

A

Chinese culture does not allow for these cultural differentiations- they are all seen as equals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sample

How many Canadian children were recruited?

What was the economical status of the children?

A

108 (mix of genders)

Mostly middle-class

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sample

Where were the children recruited from?

A

Elementary schools in their area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Method

What type of experiment did Lee use?

A

Lab experiment (but with quasi elements: culture and age)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Method

Whast experimental design did Lee use?

A

Independent measures design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Design

What IV’s were present in the study?

A
  • Culture (Canadian or Chinese)- quasi
  • Age (7,9,11)- quasi
  • Social/ Physical story (randomly assigned)
  • Prosocial/ antisocial story
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Design

What DV’s were present in the study?

A
  • Rating given to the ‘action’/ ‘deed’ in the story
  • Rating given to what was ‘said’ (lie/truth)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Design

What controls were present within physical/social and culture/age conditions?

A
  • Prosocial/ truth-telling
  • Prosocial/ lie-telling
  • Antisocial/ truth-telling
  • Antisocial/ lie-telling
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Procedure

How did the experimenter present the children with the stories?

A

He read them 4 short moral stories aloud, all accompanied by an illustration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Procedure

What did the stories typically look like? (e.g. physical/prosocial/lie-telling)

A

Action:
“Alex decided to tidy up the classroom.”
Question 1:
“Is what Alex did good or naughty?”
Response to action:
Teacher: “Do you know who cleaned the classroom?”
Alex: “I did not do it.”
Question 2:
“Is what Alex did good or naughty?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Procedure

How were children asked to rate the action and what was said?

A

With a 7 point likert scale, ranging from ‘very, very good’ to ‘very, very bad’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Procedure

What did the full likert scale look like?

A
  • Very, very good
  • Very good
  • Good
  • Neither good nor bad
  • Bad
  • Very bad
  • Very, very bad

Use 3 stars for very, very bad and 3 x’s for very, very bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Procedure

How were children told to respond?

A

Either verbally or by pointing

16
Q

Procedure

How did testing take place?

A

Each child was tested individually

17
Q

Results

How did children rate prosocial behaviours in the prosocial/ truth telling situation?

A

All children rated prosocial behaviours similarly

18
Q

Results

How did Canadian and Chinese children differ when rating truth telling in the prosocial/ truth telling situation?

A

Canadian: each age- gave similar ratings to truth telling
Chinese: ratings became less positive as age increased (SELF-AGGRANDISEMENT- seen as boasting)

19
Q

Results

How did Canadian children rate lie telling?

Did this change as age increased?

A

Rated it negatively- as age increased, ratings became less negative

20
Q

How did the ratings of Chinese children as their age increased?

A

Changed from negative to positive- (SELF EFFACEMENT- seen as being humble)

21
Q

How did the ratings of antisocial/ lie/truth telling differ between the cultures

A

They didn’t- there was no difference

22
Q

How can moral reasoning be influenced according to Lee’s conclusions?

A

It can be influenced by our culture and society in which we live
Influence of social-cultural factors grows stronger as we age

23
Q

What word did Lee use to describe some aspects of moral reasoning, like judging antisocial lying as bad?

A

Some aspects of moral reasoning may be universal