Relationships(factors affecting attraction - Physical attraction)

Question 1

The idea of physical attraction in partner preferences -

Answer 1

Research has indicated that physical attractiveness is important in selecting a potential mate, Men in particular place a great deal of the idea of physical attraction. There are many explanations to the idea of physical attraction and can be explained through the evolutionary theory.

Question 2

Evolutionary theory -

Answer 2

Shackelford and Larsen found that people with symmetrical faces are seen as more attractive seen to be genetically fit. People are also attracted to others due to neotenous features (baby-face) E.G widely separated and large eyes, delicate chin and small nose.

Question 3

Matching hypothesis -

Answer 3

Research into physical attraction in romantic relationships has concerned itself with the matching hypothesis. Where common-sense has told us that we are most unlikely to keep the most attractive people. It is an assessment that are own attractiveness plays a role in selecting a future partner. The hypothesis states that people choose romantic partners who are similar in our own physical attractiveness. So therefore we make a judgement of our own value to a potential partner.

Question 4

Support for the matching hypothesis -
(1988)

Answer 4

Feingold carried out a meta-analysis of 17 studies and found a significant correlation in ratings of attraction of romantic partners, this involved studies where they looked at real life partners, so offers ecological validity to the study. The correlation indicated 0.39 of romantic couples which was found statistically significant.

Question 5

Cultural differences in attraction -

Answer 5

Research from Cunningham has shown what is seen as physically attractive is constant across all cultures. Where female features of large cheekbone, small nose and high eyebrows ETC, were all rated highly attracted in white, Hispanic and Asian males. However and Kim found that Korean and American students judged physical attraction on people who were trustworthy and concerned for others. Therefore there is cultural difference in what is perceived as physically attractive from the idea of external features to actual personality and may show some cultures over look looks. It may suggest therefore in terms of the matching hypothesis that Korean and American students and there cultures are more concerned about whether there considerations and personality are more up to standards of the other potential partner they are seeking and may disregard looks which may suggest research of these cultures may not support the hypothesis and personality may not be regarded as physical attraction in some cultures.