Pupils Sexual & Gender Identities: Lesson 30 Flashcards
What did Connell 1995 say about pupils experiences at school?
- Contributes to ‘hegemonic masculinity.’
- “the dominance of heterosexual masculine identities and the subordination and marginalisation of both feminine and homosexual identities.”
What are ways that schools reenforce traditional sexual & gender identities?
- Double standards
- Verbal abuse
- The male gaze
- Male peers groups
- Female peer groups
- Teachers and discipline
Key points on double standards
- Double standard on expectations girls & boys behaviour
- Lees 1993
- Radical feminists say this is a way of men enforcing control though patriarchy
What did Lees 1993say about double standards?
- Boys boast about sexual activities
- Girls are labelled ‘slags’ if they do not have a steady boyfriend and if they dress/speak a particular way
- Boys sexual activities are celebrated by other boys and ignored by teachers, where as girls sexual activity is negatively labelled
Key points on verbal abuse?
- Name-calling and other forms of verbal abuse used by boys to negatively label girls’ behaviour and/or dress sense if they do not conform to the gender norms
- Pupils avoid engaging in behaviours which make them the subject of verbal abuse leading to reinforcement of gender and sexual identities
- The labels applied by students to each other are done so simply to reenforce traditional gender norms and identities
Who are the people who spoke about verbal abuse?
- Connell (1995): Gender and sexual identities reproduced through “rich vocabulary of abuse.”
- Lees (1986): Girls who sexually available are labelled ‘slags’ and the girls who are not are labelled ‘drags’.
- Paechter (1998): Name calling reenforces male power in schools and shapes gender identities.
Labels, such as gay used by pupils to police each other - Parker (1996): Boys labelled as gay for having female friends or being too friendly with female teachers
What is the male gaze?
- Depicting women and the world from a heterosexual, masculine perspective, which presents women to the audience as sexual objects
- When men look at women and see them as objects for their pleasure
What did Mac and Gahill say about the male gaze 1994?
- Male pupils & male teachers see girls as sexual objects & make judgements about their appearance.
- The male gaze is a form of surveillance which reenforces heterosexual hegemonic masculinity & devalues femininity
- Boys discuss their sexual conquests and ambitions to reenforce their masculinity
- Boys who do not engage in the male gaze are at risk of being labelled gay
What are Male peer groups?
- Male peer groups reenforce hegemonic masculinity through verbal abuse and peer pressure
- Peer groups e.g Willis, Epstein
- Mac & Gahill 1994
What did Mac & Gahill 1994 say about male peer groups?
- Schools produce a range of class-based gender identities.
- Working class boys are ‘macho lads’ & label peers who want to achieve in education as ‘dickhead achievers.’
- The middle class boys see themselves as ‘real Englishmen’ & project image of effortless achievement; they succeed with little or no effort
- Some middle class boys may put in effort in secret to both achieve & protect their masculine status within schools
What did Redman Mac & Gahill 1997 say about male peer groups?
- The hegemonic definition of ‘masculinity’ is not fixed & changes between WC boys in lower schools and MC boys in sixth form.
- WC boys are ‘macho lads’ & MC boys are ‘real Englishmen’
- Shift from traditional, WC masculinity towards MC masculinity as boys move between lower schools and sixth form.
- Reflects the more MC atmosphere & approach of sixth form, where MC masculinity is based on intellectual abilities and not physical toughness
Key points on female peer groups
- Girls peer pressured in to looking, speaking and behaving in a certain way
- Girls police each other’s identities and those who do not conform are negatively labelled i.e. ‘tramps’.
- Girls will conform to traditional feminine gender identities to avoid labels and verbal abuse from their peers
- Female peer groups e.g Archer et al 2010
What did Ringrose 2013 say about female peer groups?
- Studied peer groups of 13 and 14 year old WC girls in schools in South Wales.
- Popularity is crucial to girls’ identity as they transition from a culture of girls friendship to a heterosexual dating culture.
- Girls face a choice between:
●An idealised feminine identity; loyalty to the female peer group
●A sexualised identity; competing for boys in the dating culture
What did Currie et al 2007 say about female peer groups?
- Relationships with boys offers the girls symbolic capital, but it’s a delicate balancing act
- Girls who think they’re better than the others because they have a boyfriend are at risk of slut-shaming by the other girls.
- Girls who don’t compete for boys are at risk of frigid-shaming by the other girls.
What did Reay 2001 say about female peer groups?
- Girls who wish to be successful must form a ‘boffin identity’ & conform to school’s perception of the ideal feminine pupil
- May lead to educational attainment but it also means they have to appear uninterested in boys, and other traditional feminine interests
- At risk of being excluded or shamed by other girls, and also boys
What did Mac & Gahill 1988 say about teachers & discipline?
- Male teachers discipline boys for behaving ‘like girls.’
- Male teachers make fun of boys when they score lower than girls
- Teachers ignore male verbal abuse directed at the girls, & often blamed the girls for attracting the attention to begin with
- These actions reenforce traditional ideas about gender roles and gender identity
What did Andrew & Ross 1988 say about teachers & discipline?
- Male teacher behaviour subtly reenforces messages about gender roles and gender identity
- Male teachers have protective attitude towards female teachers & colleagues, & will ‘come to their rescue’ to manage disruptive pupils
- Sends message to pupils women are unable to cope