Memory Flashcards

1
Q

Evaluation of the multi-store model

A

+ Research support: Baddeley, P&§P, Bahrick

+ Practical application: Revision

  • Research against: Shallice and Warrington
  • Oversimplified: Craik and Watkins
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Shallice and Warrington (evaluation of the MSM)

A

working memory model shows STM and LTM is much more complex as shown by Shallice and Warrington who found KF had good visual but bad verbal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Craik and Watkins

A

evidence to suggest there is more than one type of rehearsal. This led to Craik and Watkins introducing elaborate rehearsal to solidify the MSM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Evaluation of working memory model

A

+ Research support: Shallice and Warrington

  • Sample bias: Case studie

+ Research support: Baddeley

  • Artificial task: F task

+ More comprehensive explanation than MSM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Shallice and Warrington find?

A

found that KF, who had brain accident, had good visual but bad verbal, suggests Phonological loop was damaged but visio sketchpad is fine. Therefore supporting that there is 2 slave systems,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was Baddeley’s procedure WWM?

A

carried out a visual tracking task on a screen. One group was told to describe the angles on a letter F while doing the tracking task while other group had to do a verbal task while doing the visual tracking task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why was Shallice and Warrington’s research flawed?

A

bias sample: only being a one off case study which was extremely unique.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Baddeley find WMM?

A

Describing the letter F was found to be much harder. Therefore suggesting we cannot use the same slave systems at the same time which supports the LTM aspect of the WMM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why is Baddeley’s research flawed?

A

lacks ecological validity. artificial material and was not representative of real life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluation of interference

A

+ Research support: McGeoch and McDonalds

  • Artificial task

+ Research support: Baddeley’s

  • Bias sample: Ruby players
  • Alternative explanation: Retrieval failure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How was McGeoch and McDonalds research flawed?

A

artificial material. For example the lists of words are not relevant to our everyday lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Baddeley and Hitch find?

A

found Rugby players could remember current season’s games and not last season’s week by week (Retroactive interference)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How was Baddeley and Hitch research flawed?

A

Bias sample: Rugby players cannot be generalised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation of retrieval failure

A

+ Research support: Goddan and Baddley

  • Artificial environment

+ Research support: Carter and Cassaday

+ Practical application: revision aid

  • Alternative explanations: Interference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation of misleading information

A

+ Practical application: Police force

+ Scientific, Controlled: Lab, confounding variables irradiated

  • Demand characteristics: figured out the aims of the study
  • Lacks ecological validity: Artificial environment
  • Bias sample: Loftus and Palmer, American
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

practical application of Misleading information

A

police forces the explanation is useful as they now know the effects of leading questions and this means that the explanation is useful for improving the legal system.

17
Q

Evaluation of Anxiety

A

+ Research support: Yulle and Cutshall

+ Ecological validity: real life

  • Case study: cannot be repeated
  • Ethical issues: Psychological harm

+ Research support: Johnson and Scott

  • Lacked control over cofounding variables
  • Ethics: deception
18
Q

Evaluation of cognitive interview

A

+ Research Support: Kohkan

+ Research Support: Stein and Mermon

  • Takes longer in comparison the SPI
  • Quality of training needed: need quick and effective
19
Q

What did Kohkan find?

A

Kohkan found 34% better success rate with CI as oppose to the standard police interview (50 study meta-analysis)

20
Q

What did Stein and Memon find?

A

Stein and Memon found CI much more productive in Brazil as oppose to torture and other ill treatments.