lecture 3 Flashcards
define Cognitive neuroscience
The field of psychology that examines the brain mechanisms that give rise to mental functions (the psychological basis of cognition)
are there levels of analysis in cognitive neuroscience
oh yes, many
what are the Four philosophical views on the mind-brain link
¤ Interactionism
¤ Epiphenominalism
¤ Parallelism
¤ Isomorphism
what is Interactionism
says The mind and brain are separate entities
define Substance dualism
the mind and the brain are separate
substances that interact with one another
what view is Substance dualism part of
Interactionism
what question does Interactionism give rise to
how do an immaterial substance like the mind influence the physical body if they are so different?
what field of thought does Rene Descartes (early 1600’s) identify with
Interactionism
what did Rene Descartes suggest
¤ Suggested that this interaction occurs in the pineal gland in the brain
what was the problem with Descartes’ suggestion
¤ But it is still not clear how the mind – a non-substance – affects a physical object – the body
what is Epiphenomenalism
Mental thought is only ever the result of physical events (changes in the brain)
what does Epiphenomenalism believe about the mind and its impact on behaviour
The mind has no causal role in determining behaviour
is interactionalism popular today
no
who is associated with Epiphenomenalism
Thomas Huxley (1874)
what did Thomas Huxley believe about the brain and mental events
¤ “all states of consciousness in us … are immediately caused by molecular changes of the brain-substance …” ** modern neuroscience?
¤ Mental events are like steam (of a train) that contributes nothing to the work of a locomotive, it is simply a biproduct
summarize Epiphenomenalism
Anything that causally contributes to a physical event must itself be a physical event
what are criticisms of Epiphenomenalism
¤ Counterintuitive:
¤ Can’t explain the evolutionary purpose of the mind
¤ Can’t explain how the brain (physical) generates consciousness (mental events)
¤ Opposite problem to interactionism
what is Parallelism
The mind and brain are two aspects of the same thing
what is the difference between parallelism and dualism
¤ Another form of dualism but NO interaction between mind and brain ¤ Every event in the mind has a corresponding event in the brain
what is the criticism of parallelism
there is no explanation for this parallel structure
“I feel pain! –> I need to get my hand off this pot”
“Grab a hot pot handle –> Pull hand away”
what is Isomorphism
There is no simple point-for-point link between the brain, the physical world and mental experiences, but they are related
what does Isomorphism say the mind and the brain is linked by
A thought (the mind) is linked to the brain through a related pattern that is active for an associated physical experience
what is Isomorphism built on
A model-building theory
explain the A model-building theory that Isomorphism is buildt on
¤ The mind is an internal model of the external world and this is reflected in
the brain
¤ The brain pattern when perceiving a face is similar to the brain pattern when imagining a face
¤ The brain supports physical and mental events following similar (not the exact same) laws
¤ The notion that the mind and brain are separate but interacting entities is consistent with what approach to the relationship between mind and brain? A.) Interactionism B.) Isomorphism C.) Interactionism and Parallelism D.) Epiphenomenonalism
A.) Interactionism
what is The principle of neural representation
Our experiences are due to representations in our nervous system (each part of the brain has neurons that will contribute to different things as we experience them/as they are activated)
what does The principle of neural representation relate to
Functional specialization
what is Jerry Fodor’s modularity of mind hypothesis related to (which feild)
Functional specialization
what is Jerry Fodor’s modularity of mind hypothesis
¤The brain is composed of modules ¤Modules perform a very limited number of tasks ¤Modules are inborn ‘compartments’ (innate) ¤A rationalist view
what are modules in Jerry Fodor’s modularity of mind hypothesis
Dedicated input systems needed for specific mental tasks
how do modules in Jerry Fodor’s modularity of mind hypothesis work
Processes lower-level information (e.g., color and orientation of visual stimuli)
¤ Localized to particular brain areas
¤ Domain specific
¤ Fast and work in a mandatory manner
The idea of modules opposes what view
the view that the brain is a general-purpose device
what is Jerry Fodor’s modularity of mind hypothesis an updated version of
phrenology
who came up with phrenology
Gall and Spurzheim (late 1700s)
what is phrenology
Parts of the brain correspond to mental
functions and personality characteristics
according to phrenology, when is the explanation for bumps and dents on people’s heads
Well-used mental functions cause the related brain area to grow and protrude (bump). Not used mental functions will cause the related brain area to shrink (dent)
¤ Use these bumps and dents on the skull to measure mental strengths and weaknesses
In it’s popularity, phrenology was used for many reasons which are what
¤ Spousal selection ¤ Criminal Reform
what is the issue with phrenology
¤ Problematic assumption: The more highly developed the function, the more visible the associated region is on the skull ¤ Size matters ¤ Problematic method for localizing functions ¤ Very speculative