Hobson- Imperialism Flashcards
contents
- argues against the need for imperialism
-surplus production and capital - excess saving by the wealthy
- “There is no necessity to open up new foreign markets; the home markets are capable of indefinite expansion”
- social reforms to combat over-saving
historical context
- New imperialism of 1870 onwards
- the scramble for Africa
-The manchest guardian correspondent years are a turning point which allow him to connect his economic beliefs to an anti imperielst message - rise of monopolies and finance capitalism
- warns of danger of war
relation to burbank and cooper
partially supportive
-britain was terrorizing populaiton and extracting revenue in it colonies
- asia attracted europeans with wealth and commercial vitality
provides different causes for imperialism
- skills and connections
-ambitions
-civilising
-couldnt unite post roman world so turn attention elsewhere
-expansionist empires existed through history
-europeans didn’t criticise colonism as such
- conquered people appreciated coming part of great entities
Barkley
reasons behind ottoman conquest varied
-constantople provided peace prestige and legacy
-egypt provided wealth
-hungary was strategical for wars with Austria
- balkans were a breadbaslet
-mecca and medina religious support
baghdad fortress against safavids and an only caliphates capital
-istanbul collected taxed but not a reason for expansion
-religion was important for many empires (habsburgs, russians ottomans
mamdani
colony of natal
-creation of seperate code of law for white sellers and natvies
hobson: economic hierarchies create unequal political system
indirect rule as a practical mechanism through which economic goals fo imperialism are met. indesrect rule lessen conflict
Hobson: imperialism is a sysymptom fo over prodcution/ capitalism. use oflocal admin lessens the capital cost of empire
wilson
The hre is an imperial monarchy
this contrasts Hobson: reason for empire is economical
Pufendorf about power balance in the HRE “offered the best hope for peace, not just in central Europe, but also for the continent as a whole”
this contrasts with Hobson: modern imperialism causes conflict and mentions when imperial spheres of influence overlap
influence of marxism
lenin imperialism the highest stage of capitalism
luxemburg the accumulation of capital
was it ideological or economic
- power and then as an extension of money
- also international competition
- maintaining rule more expensive than conquest