HC 8: Leadership & Gender Flashcards
Do women have less human capital for leadership positions: Qualifications?
One explanation for the leadership gender gap is that women lack human capital
due to deficiencies in the skills, knowledge, and psychological attributes that enable leadership.
IN 2015 in US – women received 57% of BA degrees, 60% of MSc degrees and 52% of PhD’s
Generally women tend to show better academic performance on average
Do women have less human capital for leadership positions: Experiences?
Young people’s experiences outside of classrooms could build human capital in the form of self-confidence and competitiveness
Schoolboys participate more in sports, while school girls more in social clubs and student government – all of these are associated with
positive effects on well-being, pro-sociality, self-control…etc..
This pattern appears to be similar through higher education (in US)- men still do more sport, women more student government
Limited evidence suggests that competitive sports foster competitive behaviours elsewhere, but the main message is that currently there do
do not appear to be drastic differences in young men’s and women’s behaviors that could explain the bias in leadership
Do women have less human capital for leadership positions: Occupational interests and ambitions?
Women prefer and are employed in jobs with more communal focus- helping and interacting with people.
Meta-analysis investigating sex differences in preferences for job attributes shows that women show stronger preferences for jobs where they can: work with people, help others, have an easy commute, have opportunities for development of social networks
while men showed stronger preferences for solitude.
Women outnumber men as jobseekers in : non-profits, government, public service, health care…etc
Compared to men, women show less interest in political leadership
> Important to note that overall career ambitions are no different between women and men- adequately paid job, commitment to the organisations
Do women have less human capital for leadership positions: Family responsibilities?
It’s clear that women spend more time on childcare and house work
Historically this has also been the case, where women more often than not sacrificed career growth for family obligations
A large-scale study of professionals and managers in Fortune 500 companies found a 36% higher quit rate among women than men (Hom, Roberson, & Ellis, 2008).
This difference attenuated in positions occupied by more women because of a higher male quit rate in such jobs.
Women quit more than men only in the early years of job tenure and more often for family reasons
Part time work is increasing particularly among women – consequence slower career progress, also affects high-status women leaders who reduce their work hours for family reasons more than men do
Meta-analyses suggest there are some differences in leadership styles between women and men
Leadership style:
That is, their typical modes of interacting with their superiors, peers, and subordinates.
In summary, women’s leadership style tends to be more democratic and participative, compared with men’s more autocratic and directive style.
The study found no differences in task oriented versus interpersonally oriented leadership—
the extent to which they emphasized maintaining rules and procedures versus attending to followers’ needs
! Differences in styles are relatively small, and there is a possibility of selection bias
Meta-analyses suggest there are some differences in leadership styles between women and men:
Transformational leadership-
Female managers also tend to adopt a transformational style somewhat more than men do.
Future oriented rather than present oriented and that strengthens organizations by inspiring followers’ commitment and ability to contribute creatively to organizations.
Transformational leadership involves establishing oneself as a role model by gaining followers’ trust and confidence.
By mentoring and empowering followers, such leaders encourage them to develop their full potential and thus to contribute more effectively to their organization.
Meta-analyses suggest there are some differences in leadership styles between women and men:
Transactional leadership-
Transactionally, female managers use more rewards than men do.
Appeal to subordinates’ self-interest by establishing exchange relationships with them. This type of leadership involves clarifying subordinates’ responsibilities, rewarding them for meeting objectives, and correcting them for failing to meet objectives.
Meta-analyses suggest there are some differences in leadership styles between women and men:
Laissez-faire
Men, more than women, attend to subordinates’ failures to meet standards and display the more problematic styles that involve delay in solving problems or being absent or uninvolved at critical times.
General failure to tae responsibility for managing
Are more sex-typical leadership styles more effective?
There is no clear evidence to suggest that democratic- participative leadership style correlates with leader effectiveness
However- moderate levels of assertiveness are effective- too high assertiveness can have detrimental effects
What kind of leadership style is positively correlated to effectiveness?
Transformational leadership and rewarding followers is positively related to effectiveness
What kind of leadership style shows weaker associations with leader effectiveness?
Transactional leadership, punishing, show weaker associations with leader effectiveness
Early studies for The Business Case
Early studies show positive correlation between gender diversity and financial outcomes
so-called business case whereby female leadership is said to bring about higher corporate profits.
Early studies are problematic for multiple reasons: poor statistical control for endogeneity—that is, statistical anomalies such as reverse causation, omitted variables, selection biases, and flawed measures
More recent studies for the Business Case model
Adams and Ferriera (2009) found an overall negative average effect of the gender diversity of corporate boards when controlling for individual firm characteristics.
When firms poorly governed –
Specifically, the presence of female directors reduced attendance problems of boards and increased monitoring of CEOs, holding them accountable for poor performance.
This monitoring benefited firms with weak governance, but was counter productive for firms that were well governed.
> Meta-analysis of 140 studies found a tiny positive effect
Conclusion on the research on gender leaders’ style and effectiveness suggests
research on leaders’ style and effectiveness suggests that style differences between women and men are unlikely to hinder women’s performance as leaders but instead could even enhance their performance. Also, findings on leaders’ effectiveness suggest neither male nor female advantage
Parental Investment Theory
Women’s greater investment in reproduction, lead to women being choosier, and preferences for partners with resource holding potential