HC 10 Research methods 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Conducting research

A
  1. Research design
  2. Analysing results
  3. Endogeneity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Specific (measure)

A

SPin: Hoge Specificity rules IN.
- True Negative: Wie hebben het echt niet?

  • Vergroten Specificiteit: No or few false positives, but many false negatives (verkleinen sensitiviteit).
  • Hoe groot is de proportie die het niet hebben (actual negatives) die correct zijn geïdentificeerd?

SPin en SNout: Hoge SPeciviciteit rules IN! hoge SeNsitiviteit rules OUT!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sensitive (measure)

A

SNout: Hoge Sensitivity rules OUT.
- True Positive: Wie hebben het echt wel?

  • Vergroten Sensitiviteit: No or few false negatives but many false positives (verkleinen specificiteit)
  • Hoe groot is de proportie die het wel hebben (actual positives) die correct zijn geïdentificeerd?

SPin en SNout: Hoge SPeciviciteit rules IN! hoge SeNsitiviteit rules OUT!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sample size (Type 1, Type 2?)

  • Too Small
  • Too Big
  • Rule of Thumb
A
  • Too small: Unable to pick up subtle effects (Type II error: wrongly not rejecting the H0)
  • Too big: almost everything becomes significant (Type I error: wrongly rejecting the H0)
  • Rule of thumb: 20 participants per cell
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Analyses Study types (4)

A
  • Discriptive study
  • Correlational study
  • Experimental studie
  • Quasi-experimental study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Discriptive study (2)

A
  • can give ecological valid picture of constructs in a situation
  • Cannot draw conclusions about relationships or causes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Correlational study (2)

A
  • Can give insight into the relationship between constructs

- Cannot draw conclusions about causality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Experimental study (3)

A
  • Can give insight into the causal relationship between independent and dependent variabels
  • Because of extremely high control of environment low ecological validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Quasi-experimental designs (4)

A
  • Field experiment
  • Usage of intstrumental variables (e.g. smoking, health and tax as independent variable)
  • Granger causality (longitudinal data; corruption and bonusses)
  • combination of correlational and experimental design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Endogeneity

A

True model: Y is completely explained by X1 and X2 ( no error)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

E.g. Selection bias (AH)

A
  • Participants are generally more compliant than those who refuse to partake
  • Shop lifting is not equally distributed over all times of the day (eg. More during school lunch hour)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

E.g. Information bias (AH)

A

•Eg. compliance and risk officers report more economic crime in organizations than other
employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Type 1 error

A
  • Alpha
  • False Positive
  • Reject H0 while it is actually true
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Type 2 error

A
  • Beta
  • False Negative
  • Accept H0 while it is actually false
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

3 Sources of Endogeneity

A

1.Omitted variables

2.Common method variance /bias
•Harman’s single factor score (if factor score

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Granger Causality

A

Meting in tijd
X1 > Y1
X2 > Y2

X1 op Y2 gecontroleerd voor Y1
Je moet geen effect heben van Y1 op X1 gecontroleerd voor X1