HC 4: Follower-Centric Approaches Flashcards

1
Q

Activation and application of a category to a target to (4)

A
  1. infer a lot of important information about the target,
  2. understand and predict the actions of the target,
  3. coordinate our own actions in relation to the target, and
  4. understand the actions of fellow percievers of the same targe
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a Leader Category

A

A fuzzy, ill-defined knowledge structure, that enables us to distinguish leaders from non-leaders

It contains, features and properties, that individually, are not necessary nor sufficient to warrant the inclusion in the category

What does that mean? it can contain, dominance, intelligence,….

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Social Cognition and Human Cognition

A

Human cognition is at least in part based on
categories

Categories contain vast amount of information
and conceptual knowledge

Categories are crucial for efficient and effective
communication and cooperation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are Categories?

A

Categories are symbolic knowledge structures that are stored in long-term memory and that serve as a stable, internal, mental model.
Instead of processing each instance of an object, event, person, or animal as novel, people transform their “transient experiences into internal models”

Activation and application of a category to a target allow us infer a lot of important information about the target, understand and predict the actions of the target,
coordinate our own actions in relation to the target, and understand the actions of fellow percievers of the same target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Leader Category?

A

A fuzzy, ill-defined knowledge structure, that enables us to distinguish leaders from non-leaders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Family resemblance principle

A

(Leadership Categories)

Family resemblance principle

The higher the proportion of attributes a
target shares with other category members,
the more prototypical it is deemed to be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the LC contain?

Structured around traits (Lord et al., 1984)

A

traits are central to human thinking and memory processes and are automatically and spontaneously applied when perceivers are confronted with others’ behavior

traits are so hardwired into our thinking that we perceive much of the inanimate and animal world in trait terms

Lord et al., 1984 study- free recall method- participant spontaneously generated 59 leader traits, with different prototypicality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the LC contain?

Three-level structure (Rosch, 1978)

A
  1. Superordinate
  2. Basic
  3. Subordinate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the LC contain?

Explain the three-level structure (Rosch, 1978)

  1. Superordinate
A
  1. SUPERORDINATE: the broadest, most abstract features common to most leaders, and unique to the category ( little overlap with contrasting category)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the LC contain?

Explain the three-level structure (Rosch, 1978)

  1. Basic
A
  1. BASIC: incorporates context, Lord et al. (1984) have argued that individuals distinguish
    11 different basic level leaders: business, finance, minor ity, education, religion, sports, national politics, world politics, labor, media, and military.
    Although Lord et al.’s work is seminal, it is worth noting that this structure is based on a single study and that alternative basic level categories may exist
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the LC contain?

Explain the three-level structure (Rosch, 1978)

  1. Subordinate
A
  1. SUBORDINATE: further differentiating features, providing a more detailed and complete understanding of leadership- e.g. sex
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Variability and Stability of LC

A

Most groups within a society share a common understanding of leadership

Findings indicate that university students and employees possess similar mental models of leadership, as do employees who differ in terms of age, organizational tenure, organizational position (Epitropaki & Martin, 2004; Offermann et al., 1994), and organizational identification (Martin & Epitropaki, 2001).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sex differences in leadership category

A

Men’s leader prototype appears to include traits such as domineering and pushy, whereas women’s prototype includes traits such as interpersonal sensistivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cultural differences in leadership category

Javidan et al., 2006

A

For instance, research suggests that individuals vary cross-culturally in how they react to abusive leaders (Bond, Wan, Leung, & Giacalone, 1985) or violations of justice principles (Tsui et al., 2007). Such findings underscore the possibility that Western leadership conceptualizations may not be universally endorsed

For instance, results at this level of analysis suggest that the 10 clusters of nations differ significantly in terms of the extent to which they emphasize charismatic/value-based lead ership, a form of leadership that focuses on motivating and expecting high outcomes from individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
On individual level leadership category is 
relatively stable (Epirtropaki & Martin, 2004)
A

Asked respondents to indicate how descriptive a series of traits were of a business leader in general, assessed on two occasions, 1 year apart.

Why stability emerged in their research, it is necessary that readers first recognize that although humans are capable of careful, conscious, serial thought, more often than not the world is experienced through a nonconscious system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Development of the Leadership Category (4)

A

1) From early life the LC is unconsciously and slowly acquired via associations
2) The LC becomes more abstract and elaborated
3) High degree of similarity between young children and adults in predicting leadership outcomes
4) Maternal and paternal characteristics inlfuence the LC

17
Q

Development of the Leadership Category explain studies

A

Seemingly, their findings suggest that very early on, children associate facial features with personality characteristics (i.e., competent), which are used to make leadership decisions similar to those generated by adults.

Together, these two studies indicate that the standards utilized to form leadership perceptions consolidate at a very early age.

An important practical implication of this work is that it suggests that interventions intended to undermine biased leadership categories
(e.g., emphasis on masculine characteristics) may be most efficacious at a very early age.

18
Q

Use an application of the LC

A

Category use can happen in a top down manner and generate stereotypic judgments

Category use can affect memory of events

For instance, several studies have documented that perceivers confuse unobserved category-consistent behavior with behaviors that were actually observed.

19
Q

Recognition based application of the LC

A

whereby the perceiver draws upon the characteristics of the target to make a leadership judgment

The greater the overlap that exists between a target’s perceived features and the category held in long-term memory, the more strongly the category label leader will be applied to a target.

20
Q

Target fit to the LC can mediate employee

outcomes

A

demonstrated that perceived supervisory fit to the leader category impacted the quality of the leader–member exchange (LMX) and, indirectly through LMX, influenced employee organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and well-being.

21
Q

Factors associated with application of

the LC

A

Height

Individual and group goals

Also: talkativeness, attractiveness, masculinity,
perceptual salience

22
Q

Explaination Dominance associated with LC

A

Dominant individuals lord over us, we look up to them, they are high in the food chain, they are at the top of the organizational chart, and they look down on us from high upon their thrones. The bodily experience of looking up, versus down, relates to leadership, power, and dominance and, hence, data indicate that we are more fluent in processing status information when it is presented in the appropriate spatial location (Schubert, 2005) and that vertical information conveyed through an organizational chart colors our leadership perceptions (Giessner & Schubert, 2007).

23
Q

Where does Target Catergorization depend on?

A

target categorization depends not only on fit to the central tendency of a category, but also on the end-state or goal toward which a perceiver is striving.

it seems clear that we do forgo our freedom in part because leaders promote group survival and success

24
Q

Inference based application of the LC

A

Attribution of group performance to leaders is not contingent on when performance information is delivered, or subject familiarity with the leader

Contemporary work conducted within the context of CEO selection further suggests that perceivers
may be predisposed to the inferential path way and only default to recognition-based processes when
confronted with ambiguity regarding performance

25
Q

What do direct comparisons of the recognition pathway and inferential pathway indicate?

A

Direct comparisons of the recognition pathway and inferential pathway indicate
that they additively impact leadership judgment, but that the relative weighting of each may depend on national culture

Contemporary work conducted within the context of CEO selection further suggests that perceivers
may be predisposed to the inferential path way and only default to recognition-based processes when confronted with ambiguity regarding performance

26
Q

Leader’s fit to group category modulates follower’s evaluations of leaders: differences found in: (5)

A

1) failure to reach goals,
2) self-sacrificial behaviour,
3) procedural fairness,
4) distributive justice,
5) group oriented rethoric

e.g. failure to reach goals: although their perceived ability to deliver success is critical and failure is typically not an option for leaders, not all failures are equal and, at times, leaders may be granted a license to fail by subordinates